Comments on: UK internet ‘Name and Shame’ plan

By: cody

cody — Tue, 18 Nov 2008 09:07:29 +0000

“74yy Say….” -> smells likes soms crap passed your filter unless we got a chinese dissedent interested in your site

By: Ryan Scott Scheel

Ryan Scott Scheel — Tue, 18 Nov 2008 01:54:17 +0000

I’m also pretty sure that surfer isn’t the one who wrote the “Share The Wealth” stories.

By: Ryan Scott Scheel

Ryan Scott Scheel — Tue, 18 Nov 2008 01:53:32 +0000

surfer shows lack of basic reading skills there…

‘UK culture minister Barbara Follett, and her Tory shadow, Ed Vaizey, âhave backed the idea that web providers must be embarrassed into dealing with violent, sexually explicit web content,â says The Guardian.’

Four references to UK politics should be enough to point that out.

I laugh in their idea that the web should be regulated. The entire reason it has prospered is because it has been open. The only barrier to access is bandwidth costs and hosting.

By: surfer

surfer — Mon, 17 Nov 2008 19:23:58 +0000

maybe parents should ‘parent’ more often.

why should my pr0n access be denied due to lack of parental supervision?

but I don’t live in Canada, either.