<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canadian file sharing rebound</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/1765/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/1765</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:11:09 -0300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/1765/comment-page-1#comment-2910</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2004 01:52:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-2910</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m blind, and if you try and navigate the site they say to go to in the commercial with a screen reader, you will quickly find that it is inposible.
I know it&#039;s a minority we&#039;re talking about, but you can bet your ass that if a sited person stuck in the middle heard this, they would use it as a excuse if you will, to continue download unprotected free music, and who can blame them? Nobody wants drm that calls home just so you can listen to the god dam song!

Also, I believe the numbers in that servey are fake, there&#039;s no way that 74 percent of Canadians believe the indistry are right, lol, right, but it does make some good points like the price is to much, wich in total actuality, it is. They forgot about the contant factor, and the quality. Personaly, I try and dl mp3s, or ogg&#039;s of high quality, usualy 192 or more when posible. The WMA&#039;s downloadable from napster and the similar services are not that grate , they sound like a 96k mp3, and that sounds like crap through headphones. It sounds worse then most 64k windows media streams, lots of tinniness, if you know what I mean.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m blind, and if you try and navigate the site they say to go to in the commercial with a screen reader, you will quickly find that it is inposible.<br />
I know it&#8217;s a minority we&#8217;re talking about, but you can bet your ass that if a sited person stuck in the middle heard this, they would use it as a excuse if you will, to continue download unprotected free music, and who can blame them? Nobody wants drm that calls home just so you can listen to the god dam song!</p>
<p>Also, I believe the numbers in that servey are fake, there&#8217;s no way that 74 percent of Canadians believe the indistry are right, lol, right, but it does make some good points like the price is to much, wich in total actuality, it is. They forgot about the contant factor, and the quality. Personaly, I try and dl mp3s, or ogg&#8217;s of high quality, usualy 192 or more when posible. The WMA&#8217;s downloadable from napster and the similar services are not that grate , they sound like a 96k mp3, and that sounds like crap through headphones. It sounds worse then most 64k windows media streams, lots of tinniness, if you know what I mean.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


