<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RIAA and MPAA at Elizabethtown College</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/17791/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/17791</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:33:40 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: lions2008</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/17791/comment-page-1#comment-904783</link>
		<dc:creator>lions2008</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 19:12:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/17791#comment-904783</guid>
		<description>How much does it cost for a mainstream artist to make one song?
Or better yet, a whole album?
Could that be why the RIAA tries to justify 150000?
If so, I&#039;d still think its a load of crap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How much does it cost for a mainstream artist to make one song?<br />
Or better yet, a whole album?<br />
Could that be why the RIAA tries to justify 150000?<br />
If so, I&#8217;d still think its a load of crap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/17791/comment-page-1#comment-904761</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 18:41:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/17791#comment-904761</guid>
		<description>&quot;...the RIAA finds this justified because they need to cover profit losses for the companies and artists they represent,”...

What a load of hokem. Someone get the fire hoses and shovels, the room is near filled with BS. 

The RIAA has stated from the start that the money recouped from lawsuits would not go to the artists. Rather they planned to fold the money back into the lawsuit game. 

Then too, Mrs. Duckworth has made mention that the lawsuit game is a money pit, not a money maker. I would suggest this is the reason for their pricing tier that they go by for a song. Every bit of lawyering they do, raises the cost of the fine in an effort to streamline the robbery procedure. 

Profit/losses? Those are imaginary figures when it comes to figuring profits. Why else have two sets of books, one for tax purposes when dealing with the government and one for contractual purposes for dealing with artists and business.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;the RIAA finds this justified because they need to cover profit losses for the companies and artists they represent,”&#8230;</p>
<p>What a load of hokem. Someone get the fire hoses and shovels, the room is near filled with BS. </p>
<p>The RIAA has stated from the start that the money recouped from lawsuits would not go to the artists. Rather they planned to fold the money back into the lawsuit game. </p>
<p>Then too, Mrs. Duckworth has made mention that the lawsuit game is a money pit, not a money maker. I would suggest this is the reason for their pricing tier that they go by for a song. Every bit of lawyering they do, raises the cost of the fine in an effort to streamline the robbery procedure. </p>
<p>Profit/losses? Those are imaginary figures when it comes to figuring profits. Why else have two sets of books, one for tax purposes when dealing with the government and one for contractual purposes for dealing with artists and business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
