Is Canada ’spam haven’?
p2pnet news view | Advertising:- Montreal spammer Adam Guerbuez (right) last month accused CTV of spreading “vile lies” about him.
He and his company, Atlantis Blue Capital, were ordered to pay Facebook $436.2 million in statutory damages, and another $436.2 million dollars in aggravated statutory damages, for violations of the Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography and Marketing Act (CAN-SPAM), p2pnet.
“While Facebook acknowledges that it is unlikely to recover much of the awarded damages, the case has placed the spotlight on Canada’s ongoing failure to address its spam problem by introducing long overdue anti-spam legislation,” says Ottawa law professor Michael Geist, in a blog post entitled ‘
Lawless Canada Emerging as a Spam Haven’ .
Is Canada lawless? The entertainment cartels claim that’s the case. But their assertions aren’t worth a damn.
There might, however, be justification for alleging we’re home base for a fair number of spammers and, “The fact that organizations are forced to use U.S. courts and laws to deal with Canadian spammers points to an inconvenient truth – Canadian anti-spam laws are woefully inadequate and we are rapidly emerging as a haven for spammers eager exploit the weak legal framework,” says Geist, continuing »»»
Canada initially recognized the need to address the spam issue with formation in 2004 of a National Task Force on Spam that included a broad cross-section of marketers, telecom companies, and public policy groups (I was a member of the task force). The Task Force unanimously recommended that the government introduce anti-spam legislation.
Years later, the issue continues to languish on the legislative agenda. Successive governments – both Conservative and Liberal – have failed to introduce legislation (the notable exception is a Private Member’s bill introduced by Senator Yoine Goldstein earlier this year). During this fall’s election campaign, the Conservatives promised to address the issue, yet a commitment to anti-spam legislation was missing from the recent Speech from the Throne that outlined the government’s forthcoming priorities.
The continuing delays are particularly problematic given the increasingly criminal nature of spam. Once regarded as a mere nuisance, the recent flood of spam spoofing the Canada Revenue Agency that encouraged recipients to forward highly sensitive personal information highlights the very real dangers of identity theft that can result from spam activities.
The Facebook case is only the latest illustration that government inaction has had an impact. Companies anxious to target Canadian-based spammers have been forced to turn to other countries to do the job, while international law enforcement investigations into criminal spam activities run the risk of stalling in Canada since authorities may lack the requisite investigatory powers.
As the only G-7 country without anti-spam legislation, it was only a matter of time before spammers began to take advantage. Cloudmark, a leading provider of anti-spam software, recently presented a data on the origins of spam emanating from web-based email providers such as Hotmail, Gmail, and Yahoo! at an international anti-spam conference in Germany. Its research indicates that the majority of email – often up to 80 percent of traffic – from these popular services is now spam and that Canada ranked fifth worldwide as the source of web-based email spam, trailing only Iran, Nigeria, Kenya, and Israel.
Another recent study from California demonstrated how spammers profit from their activities by shifting the costs traditionally borne by marketers to the recipients of spam, namely Internet users. Although many people immediately delete spam messages, the study found that spammers remain profitable even with very low response rates.
In light of its profit-making potential, no amount of anti-spam legislation will completely eliminate spam. However, the experience to date in other countries has shown that tough new measures can reduce the amount of spam that originates from domestic sources. Given the fact that there are still several major Canadian spamming organizations thriving under the current legal framework, the best way to reduce the amount of made-in-Canada spam is to change the law.
Stay tuned.
Did you enjoy this story, or find it interesting/useful? Help keep the posts coming by donating. No amount is too small. Cheers! And thanks.
spreading “vile lies” – Does a spammer have rights?, November 26, 2008
p2pnet – Pay Facebook $873M, Canadian spammer told, November 25, 2008
Michael Geist – Lawless Canada Emerging as a Spam Haven
Use free p2pnet newsfeeds for your site. It’s really easy!
Subscribe to p2pnet.net | | rss feed: http://p2pnet.net/p2p.rss | | Mobile – http://p2pnet.net/index-wml.php
Net access blocked by government restrictions? Use Psiphon from the Citizen Lab at the University of Toronto. Go here for details.
December 5th, 2008 at 3:03 pm
Anti-spam laws in Canada are inadequate because recent governments were executing the will of their American masters on harsh copyright and other issues.
October 9th, 2009 at 5:50 am
Post trackbacks and comments to remote blogs automatically with Trackback Submitter! This tool will submit your comments to millions of blogs automatically. Trackback Submitter – the most powerful tool on the planet to submit trackbacks automatically!