Comments on: Wikipedia on kiddie porn blacklist

By: Dave

Dave — Tue, 09 Dec 2008 11:53:05 +0000

Whats the big deal? Sure the girl is in a suggestive pose, but it is still in the realm of artwork. I guess a lot of renaissance era artists must be considered pedophiles now.

By: Andy

Andy — Tue, 09 Dec 2008 03:37:11 +0000

@hippie: that’s what people mean by the “Streisand Effect”. Go read about it http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Streisand_Effect

By: Hippie

Hippie — Mon, 08 Dec 2008 23:34:59 +0000

I wouldn’t have bothered to click on the link to look if they hadn’t made such a fuss about it.
Naturally I had to go and see what the fuss was about.

If you wan’t to be certain everyone sees something, declare that no one should see it.

By: Andy

Andy — Mon, 08 Dec 2008 20:14:06 +0000

I don’t approve of promotion via shock and the Streisand effect, but I don’t approve of censorship either. The only way out of this paradox is for responsible citizens to just yawn and move on…

By: Comeoncomecast

Comeoncomecast — Mon, 08 Dec 2008 16:43:41 +0000

you cant be serious?

She is in the area of 16 to atleast 18

and NOT EVERYONE who sees that cover is going to rush out and touch little kiddies ...honestly

Catching Killers isnt enough