Comments on: RIAA thumbs its nose at judge Real

By: gene

gene — Wed, 17 Dec 2008 14:44:44 +0000

The one thing about these suits is that they ignore they have attacked the wrong person. Who was behind that keyboard when the download happened or how do we know that because someone bought a smart card programmer they stole directv programming? When the wrong person is attacked, the the actual suit filed in the court becomes a fraudulent lawsuit especially when the RIAA or Directv knows the suit is a false court complainant. This is a crime to knowingly file a suit you know to be false. The target of the suit then becomes a crime victim. But when the crime victim asks for victim assistance from the AG’s office, they are ignored. It then becomes important that the AG’s office as well as the federal victim witness program get the message that “all” victims of crime need protection. I received such a letter, responded that they were wrong. They sued anyway knowing full well they had made a mistake and sued anyway. Then a settlement requires that you not ask that criminal charges be made or that you will not be a witness against them in any criminal proceeding. With that your rights of a crime victim are gone which is also illegal and conceals the fraud. For those who were attacked and were truly innocent, the next time Justice asks you to be a witness or be a juror, treat justice as they have treated you as a victim of crime. Ignore them as a juror and witness and see just how they like it. It is the only way that Justice will protect the victim’s of suits which were fraudulent

By: Dude from Finland

Dude from Finland — Wed, 17 Dec 2008 09:54:15 +0000

Time for all those who have now been pressured into setteling their cases to gather up and slap RIAA with a class action lawsuif for the misuse of personal information with no evidence. I’d say sue them for say the last 10 years of revenue… win that and it all stops.

By: Quartz

Quartz — Tue, 16 Dec 2008 15:26:03 +0000

It would be nice if this breach of the courts order was to become a signal to other judges to raise the bar in respect of the fraudulant nature of the recording industries claims and proposed remedies, on the other hand as the information was used illegally the students have a case again the recording industry for willfully conspiring to mislead the court for the purposes of fraud.