Welcome to P2PNET.net - The original daily p2p and digital news site. Always First!
Register | Login
RIAA News
Cool Stuff
MPAA News
Games / Consoles
News
Music
Movies
TV
Open Source
Mobiles
Advertising
Product News
P2P
Off Topic
Freedom
Politics
Interviews
Security
DRM
Links
Kids and Kartels
Search: 
Search
 
Web P2PNET   
Search: 
Search
Torrent Site Tracker
MP3Rocket
 
Add real-time p2pnet headlines to YOUR site ! Click here to download our newsfeed code

RIAA Online and Street Piracy Policy: amended

p2pnet news view | RIAA News:- Last month, p2pnet ran an amended version of the RIAA’s Mission Statement.

Now, in Part Deux of The RIAA as it Really Is, we present the updated version of the organ’s Piracy: Online and on the Street »»»

It’s commonly known as piracy, but it’s a too benign term that doesn’t even begin to adequately describe the toll corporate music theft takes on the many artists, songwriters, musicians, record label employees and others who have the misfortune to be involved with one or other of Vivendi Universal, EMI, Warner Music and Sony BMG.

Hard work and great talent make music possible in spite of the efforts of the Big $ and their extortion units such as the RIAA (Recording Industry Assholes Association).

Corporate music industry theft can take various forms:

  • Record companies around the world who build businesses by stealing from artists they’re supposed to be supporting
  • Corporate criminals manufacturing mass numbers of CDs for sale in retail outlets and online, returning a mere pittance, if anything, to the bulk of originators.

Across the board, until the advent of the Net, this blatant theft hurt the music community. Now, however, artists and performers are able to break into the business with their own sites and other online enterprises, completely bypassing the corrupt Big 4 record labels.

One PR puff-piece by the Institute for Policy Innovation concludes global music piracy causes $12.5 billion of economic losses every year, 71,060 U.S. jobs lost, a loss of $2.7 billion in workers’ earnings, and a loss of $422 million in tax revenues, $291 million in personal income tax and $131 million in lost corporate income and production taxes.

p2pnet described the above study as hogwash, eliciting an angry, and ill-considered, response from Policy Innovation spokesman Tom Giovanetti.

Said a p2pnet reader in reference to the above »»»

Consider what this would mean if it were true: 12 billlion dollars and 300 million Americans. That means that every man, woman and child, every tiny baby, every 100 year old nursing home patient, every prisioner, every soldier OWES the record industry 40 bucks!

And thats just music. Surely the movie industry, software, and game producers could generate a similar report.

Then there are the lesser crybabies: books, phony handbags, duff Rolex watches, Chinese designer clothing, etc, etc., By the time everybody releases their reports, every last American OWES the “economy” several hundred bucks. This money would come right outa our pockets and into the coffers of ‘the economy’. So let’s bankrupt the nation for the sake of those poor starving cartels.

Isn’t that what their balony report boils down to?

In its anti-piracy, anti-P2P, anti-consumer policy statement, in support of the kind of nonsense routinely pumped out by Big 4-friendly unit such as IPI, the music industry has  been forced to employed a multi-faceted approach of blackmail, extortion, pseudo-education and corruption, ie »»»

• The RIAA is continuing its efforts to portray simple copyright infringement as a serious problem, causing long delays in civil court systems and suborning law enforcement agencies paid for by American citizens as corporate copyright cops
• It is continuing its efforts to brainwash fans about the value of music and the wrong ways to acquire it by, whenever possible, terrorising innocent men, women and children across America
• Record companies and their hundreds of digital partners continue to ignore the fact P2P and file sharing are here to stay and instead of recognizing them as the primary promotion, sales, marketing distribution systems of the 21st digital century, do everything in their power to maintain the same outmoded business models which were in urgent need of revision as far back as the 1970s.

The RIAA goal is to: annihilate any and all signs of competition, no matter how trifling; and, to reduce American music lovers to the status of drones willing to mindlessly accept whatever  formulaic product its masters, Vivendi Universal, EMI, Warner Music and Sony BMG, care to dish out, and at whatever price.

No need to stay tuned.



Use free p2pnet newsfeeds for your site. It’s really easy!
Subscribe to p2pnet.net | | rss feed: http://p2pnet.net/p2p.rss | | Mobile - http://p2pnet.net/index-wml.php


Net access blocked by government restrictions? Use Psiphon from the Citizen Lab at the University of Toronto. Go here for details.

HOME

4 Responses to “RIAA Online and Street Piracy Policy: amended”

  1. Eric Says:

    When the guy who invented the kaleidoscope invented the kaleidoscope, he patented it.

    Then everyone with a few bucks started making and selling them without paying royalties.

    The guy couldn’t sue them all– making the patent effectively worthless because it was too simple a device.

    Now, we have the exact same thing with file sharing. Copyrights have become effectively worthless if anyone can just make copies– admittedly cheap ones without the professional packaging, but copies nonetheless.

  2. Just my two cents Says:

    >Eric

    This may have some truth in it, if it were not for the fact that in the example that you use, the person who is suing is not the creator of the Kaleidoscope, but the person who is marketing it.

    And if that is not enough, the people that this “marketer” is going after the school children who made their own “kaleidoscope” to view it’s splendor , who are being sued not the people selling knock-off versions of the original Kaleidoscope.

    While I do understand the problem that many companies face, with pirated software (I work in the hardware/software industry), I also know that some of our most avid users, are people who learned to like our software from pirated versions, and are now paying customers (of course we wished that they started out paying customers ;-) ).

    The biggest enemy are the companies trying to make a quick buck by selling the pirated software, and not so much the user.

    When will companies like the RIAA and MPAA learn that a file that is shared, does not equal a direct loss in sale.

    Just my two cents

  3. gene Says:

    Directv and the RIAA have sued many they knew were innocent. Where people were innocent, the suits were a fraud. Law enforcement should have stepped in to stop innocent people from being sued. Those innocent people need to do what Justice did. Law enforcement ignored justice in these suits. People need to ignore justice the next time they are a juror or a witness. Jury nullification will ignore Justice the next time.

  4. surfer Says:

    RIAA Abandons Lawsuits

Leave a Reply

Please no Spam, flaming (attacking others), trolling, and posting off-topic. Thanks.

    Advertisements
GigaNews
 


Remove Spyware with AntiSpyware for Windows®