<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wiretap law &#8216;eviscerated &#8216;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/1796/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/1796</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:11:09 -0300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/1796/comment-page-1#comment-2974</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2004 23:31:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-2974</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve deleted that reference - it applied to another case (Konop v. Hawaiian Airlines, cited in the decision .pdf). And it was out of context. Thanks for pointing that out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve deleted that reference &#8211; it applied to another case (Konop v. Hawaiian Airlines, cited in the decision .pdf). And it was out of context. Thanks for pointing that out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/1796/comment-page-1#comment-2971</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2004 21:22:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-2971</guid>
		<description>Please correct: The first sentence refers to the First Circuit Court of Appeals, and then a quote later claims it was the Ninth Circuit.  I assume the quote is correct.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please correct: The first sentence refers to the First Circuit Court of Appeals, and then a quote later claims it was the Ninth Circuit.  I assume the quote is correct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


