<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New York AG Andrew Cuomo: RIAA coordinator</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/17983/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/17983</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:11:09 -0300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Hassan Bin Sober</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/17983/comment-page-1#comment-949697</link>
		<dc:creator>Hassan Bin Sober</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 12:25:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/17983#comment-949697</guid>
		<description>The effectiveness of the RIAA can be greatly hampered if the principals are restricted in their breathing privileges or have them revoked!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The effectiveness of the RIAA can be greatly hampered if the principals are restricted in their breathing privileges or have them revoked!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henry Emrich</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/17983/comment-page-1#comment-920290</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry Emrich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 20:42:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/17983#comment-920290</guid>
		<description>This is interesting, because it looks &quot;threatening&quot;, but probably won&#039;t actually DO much (other than piss a lot more people off, and waste huge amounts of bureaucratic effort.)
    As usual.

  1. The RIAA lobbybots already have this type of &quot;send them a note, and ask them to stop&quot;, in the form of DMCA takedown notices.  The thing that nobody bothers to understand about the dmca is that it has completely and utterly failed to DO anything against &quot;copyright infringement&quot; because the vast majoirity simply find nothing wrong in &quot;infringing&quot; a century-long monopoly power wielded primarily by corporate megaliths who -- in the vast majority of cases -- had absolutely nothing to do with the &quot;creations&quot;  they now monopolize.

    People realize (especially after the Sonny Bono copyright extension act), that -- barring the lobbyists&#039; actions, the vast majority of copyrighted work SHOULD be in the public domain by now.  They also realize that patent and copyright are NOT &quot;fundamental human rights&quot;.  They&#039;re compromises struck between lawmakers and special interests (NOT &quot;creators&quot; by any stretch of the imagination.)  Nobody feels particularly &quot;guilty&quot; about getting something that SHOULD have been freed up years ago.

   Especially not after having seen how the corporate lobbyibots -- when confronted with the specter of their copyright monopolies ending, simply go and &quot;buy&quot; themselves another twenty years.

     The RIAA is -- despite their confident pose -- frantically backpedalling at this point: they&#039;ve alienated their two key demographics (teenagers and music fans), shown themselves to be outright OPPOSED to any genuine &quot;innovation&quot; they can&#039;t hamstring (region coding for DVDs, the VCR as &quot;boston Strangler&quot; etc, ad infinitum).  Nobody&#039;s buying it, any more than Australian ISPs actually believe that State-coerced censorship/filtering can actually work.

   This whole premise rests on the fallacy that connectivity is static.  True, many broadband users DO have an &quot;always on&quot; connection (cable modems or dsl), but with the growth of WIFI and other technologies, &quot;networking&quot; has become progressively more ad-hoc, and I&#039;m not just talking about &quot;wardriving&quot; either.

   This shit fails utterly the first time somebody suspends a bittorent download, goes to a friend&#039;s house, and reconnects using his wireless network (or maybe Starbuck&#039;s free wifi hotspots, etc.)

   Not to mention the fact that people can buy 8 gig USB memory sticks for, what, twenty bucks?

   The REAL solution to the collosal non-&quot;problem&quot; of file-sharing is twofold:

   1. Limit the terms of copyright monopolies to the original 14 years, with NO RENEWALS.
   And,
   2. Explicitly prevent the awarding of &quot;excessive&quot; damages even DURING the 14 year monopoly period.  Make the maximum possible award the price of the &quot;content&quot; itself.
 

   Patents and copyright are SUPPOSED TO EXPIRE.
   Maybe it&#039;s high time they all &quot;expire&quot; entirely....)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is interesting, because it looks &#8220;threatening&#8221;, but probably won&#8217;t actually DO much (other than piss a lot more people off, and waste huge amounts of bureaucratic effort.)<br />
    As usual.</p>
<p>  1. The RIAA lobbybots already have this type of &#8220;send them a note, and ask them to stop&#8221;, in the form of DMCA takedown notices.  The thing that nobody bothers to understand about the dmca is that it has completely and utterly failed to DO anything against &#8220;copyright infringement&#8221; because the vast majoirity simply find nothing wrong in &#8220;infringing&#8221; a century-long monopoly power wielded primarily by corporate megaliths who &#8212; in the vast majority of cases &#8212; had absolutely nothing to do with the &#8220;creations&#8221;  they now monopolize.</p>
<p>    People realize (especially after the Sonny Bono copyright extension act), that &#8212; barring the lobbyists&#8217; actions, the vast majority of copyrighted work SHOULD be in the public domain by now.  They also realize that patent and copyright are NOT &#8220;fundamental human rights&#8221;.  They&#8217;re compromises struck between lawmakers and special interests (NOT &#8220;creators&#8221; by any stretch of the imagination.)  Nobody feels particularly &#8220;guilty&#8221; about getting something that SHOULD have been freed up years ago.</p>
<p>   Especially not after having seen how the corporate lobbyibots &#8212; when confronted with the specter of their copyright monopolies ending, simply go and &#8220;buy&#8221; themselves another twenty years.</p>
<p>     The RIAA is &#8212; despite their confident pose &#8212; frantically backpedalling at this point: they&#8217;ve alienated their two key demographics (teenagers and music fans), shown themselves to be outright OPPOSED to any genuine &#8220;innovation&#8221; they can&#8217;t hamstring (region coding for DVDs, the VCR as &#8220;boston Strangler&#8221; etc, ad infinitum).  Nobody&#8217;s buying it, any more than Australian ISPs actually believe that State-coerced censorship/filtering can actually work.</p>
<p>   This whole premise rests on the fallacy that connectivity is static.  True, many broadband users DO have an &#8220;always on&#8221; connection (cable modems or dsl), but with the growth of WIFI and other technologies, &#8220;networking&#8221; has become progressively more ad-hoc, and I&#8217;m not just talking about &#8220;wardriving&#8221; either.</p>
<p>   This shit fails utterly the first time somebody suspends a bittorent download, goes to a friend&#8217;s house, and reconnects using his wireless network (or maybe Starbuck&#8217;s free wifi hotspots, etc.)</p>
<p>   Not to mention the fact that people can buy 8 gig USB memory sticks for, what, twenty bucks?</p>
<p>   The REAL solution to the collosal non-&#8221;problem&#8221; of file-sharing is twofold:</p>
<p>   1. Limit the terms of copyright monopolies to the original 14 years, with NO RENEWALS.<br />
   And,<br />
   2. Explicitly prevent the awarding of &#8220;excessive&#8221; damages even DURING the 14 year monopoly period.  Make the maximum possible award the price of the &#8220;content&#8221; itself.</p>
<p>   Patents and copyright are SUPPOSED TO EXPIRE.<br />
   Maybe it&#8217;s high time they all &#8220;expire&#8221; entirely&#8230;.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


