<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Let the Net into court, demands Harvard team</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/17988/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/17988</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:11:09 -0300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dreddsnik</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/17988/comment-page-1#comment-922349</link>
		<dc:creator>Dreddsnik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 16:31:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/17988#comment-922349</guid>
		<description>&quot; Despite the RIAAâs announcement last week that itâs dropping its legal assault, &quot;

 A partial list of the newest cases  ( filed AFTER the claimed to have stopped filing cases ) ..

Atlantic Recording v. Williams 08-1710 W.D. Pennsylvania 12/15/08
Sony BMG Music v. Linus 08-14413 S.D. Florida 12/11/08
Arista Records v. Estrada 08-8135 C.D. California 12/10/08
UMG Recordings v. Haralambos 08-8129 C.D. California 12/10/08
SONY BMG Music v. Estrada 08-2682 D. Colorado 12/10/08
Interscope Records v. Doe 6 08-1882 D. Connecticut 12/10/08
Arista Records v. Doe 4 08-1877 D. Connecticut 12/10/08
Interscope Records v. Doe 5 08-1284 D. Connecticut 12/10/08
Interscope Records v. Doe 2 08-1878 D. Connecticut 12/10/08
Interscope Records v. Doe 3 08-1879 D. Connecticut 12/10/08
Capitol Records v. Fowler 08-2141 D. District of Columbia 12/10/08
UMG Recordings v. Mekawi 08-2142 D. District of Columbia 12/10/08
UMG Recordings v. Hensley 08-534 M.D. Florida 12/10/08
Interscope Records v. Jackson 08-544 N.D. Florida 12/10/08
UMG Recordings v. Blueford 08-119 M.D. Georgia 12/10/08
Warner Bros. Records v. Umbaugh 08-118 M.D. Georgia 12/10/08
SONY BMG Music v. Simms 08-3728 N.D. Georgia 12/10/08
Warner Bros. Records v. Wade 08-3727 N.D. Georgia 12/10/08
Capitol Records v. Williams-Ali 08-156 S.D. Iowa 12/10/08
UMG Recordings v. Decort 08-7053 N.D. Illinois 12/10/08
SONY BMG Music v. Shane 08-7055 N.D. Illinois 12/10/08
SONY BMG Music v. Byers 08-189 S.D. Indiana 12/10/08
Capitol Records v. Trusty 08-190 S.D. Indiana 12/10/08
Elektra Entertainment v. Maphet 08-1386 D. Kansas 12/10/08
Atlantic Recording v. Sanderson 08-1385 D. Kansas 12/10/08
UMG Recordings v. Gulledge 08-cv-00973-MHT-TFM M.D. Alabama 12/10/08
Warner Bros. Records Kelley 08-cv-02295-CLS N.D. Alabama 12/10/08 
SONY BMG Music v. Van Ornum 08-cv-04205-JLH E.D. Arkansas 12/10/08
Interscope Records v. Tabor 08-cv-03068-JLH W.D. Arkansas 12/10/08
BMG Music v. O&#039;Brien 08-cv-02244-HRH D. Arizona 12/10/08
Priority Records v. Easterling 08-cv-08131-PA-JTL C.D. California 12/10/08
UMG Recordings v. Ibarzabal 08-cv-08136-R-SH C.D. California 12/10/08
Interscope Records v. Doe 4 08-cv-01880-JBA D. Connecticut 12/10/08
Arista Records v. Doe 2 08-cv-01874-CFD D. Connecticut 12/10/08
Arista Records v. Doe 3 08-cv-01876-SRU D. Connecticut 12/10/08
UMG Recordings v. Burmeister 08-cv-02295-MPM-DGB C.D. Illinois 12/10/08


 A group that is willing to lie in court has no issues lying to the press, especially press that they
 control.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; Despite the RIAAâs announcement last week that itâs dropping its legal assault, &#8221;</p>
<p> A partial list of the newest cases  ( filed AFTER the claimed to have stopped filing cases ) ..</p>
<p>Atlantic Recording v. Williams 08-1710 W.D. Pennsylvania 12/15/08<br />
Sony BMG Music v. Linus 08-14413 S.D. Florida 12/11/08<br />
Arista Records v. Estrada 08-8135 C.D. California 12/10/08<br />
UMG Recordings v. Haralambos 08-8129 C.D. California 12/10/08<br />
SONY BMG Music v. Estrada 08-2682 D. Colorado 12/10/08<br />
Interscope Records v. Doe 6 08-1882 D. Connecticut 12/10/08<br />
Arista Records v. Doe 4 08-1877 D. Connecticut 12/10/08<br />
Interscope Records v. Doe 5 08-1284 D. Connecticut 12/10/08<br />
Interscope Records v. Doe 2 08-1878 D. Connecticut 12/10/08<br />
Interscope Records v. Doe 3 08-1879 D. Connecticut 12/10/08<br />
Capitol Records v. Fowler 08-2141 D. District of Columbia 12/10/08<br />
UMG Recordings v. Mekawi 08-2142 D. District of Columbia 12/10/08<br />
UMG Recordings v. Hensley 08-534 M.D. Florida 12/10/08<br />
Interscope Records v. Jackson 08-544 N.D. Florida 12/10/08<br />
UMG Recordings v. Blueford 08-119 M.D. Georgia 12/10/08<br />
Warner Bros. Records v. Umbaugh 08-118 M.D. Georgia 12/10/08<br />
SONY BMG Music v. Simms 08-3728 N.D. Georgia 12/10/08<br />
Warner Bros. Records v. Wade 08-3727 N.D. Georgia 12/10/08<br />
Capitol Records v. Williams-Ali 08-156 S.D. Iowa 12/10/08<br />
UMG Recordings v. Decort 08-7053 N.D. Illinois 12/10/08<br />
SONY BMG Music v. Shane 08-7055 N.D. Illinois 12/10/08<br />
SONY BMG Music v. Byers 08-189 S.D. Indiana 12/10/08<br />
Capitol Records v. Trusty 08-190 S.D. Indiana 12/10/08<br />
Elektra Entertainment v. Maphet 08-1386 D. Kansas 12/10/08<br />
Atlantic Recording v. Sanderson 08-1385 D. Kansas 12/10/08<br />
UMG Recordings v. Gulledge 08-cv-00973-MHT-TFM M.D. Alabama 12/10/08<br />
Warner Bros. Records Kelley 08-cv-02295-CLS N.D. Alabama 12/10/08<br />
SONY BMG Music v. Van Ornum 08-cv-04205-JLH E.D. Arkansas 12/10/08<br />
Interscope Records v. Tabor 08-cv-03068-JLH W.D. Arkansas 12/10/08<br />
BMG Music v. O&#8217;Brien 08-cv-02244-HRH D. Arizona 12/10/08<br />
Priority Records v. Easterling 08-cv-08131-PA-JTL C.D. California 12/10/08<br />
UMG Recordings v. Ibarzabal 08-cv-08136-R-SH C.D. California 12/10/08<br />
Interscope Records v. Doe 4 08-cv-01880-JBA D. Connecticut 12/10/08<br />
Arista Records v. Doe 2 08-cv-01874-CFD D. Connecticut 12/10/08<br />
Arista Records v. Doe 3 08-cv-01876-SRU D. Connecticut 12/10/08<br />
UMG Recordings v. Burmeister 08-cv-02295-MPM-DGB C.D. Illinois 12/10/08</p>
<p> A group that is willing to lie in court has no issues lying to the press, especially press that they<br />
 control.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dreddsnik</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/17988/comment-page-1#comment-922344</link>
		<dc:creator>Dreddsnik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 16:28:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/17988#comment-922344</guid>
		<description>Heh, they&#039;ll drop the case before they let that happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh, they&#8217;ll drop the case before they let that happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


