<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Has the RIAA stopped suing? Or hasn&#8217;t it?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18020/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18020</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 12:08:48 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: surfer</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18020/comment-page-1#comment-927286</link>
		<dc:creator>surfer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 22:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18020#comment-927286</guid>
		<description>Check this out .

&lt;a href=&quot;http://recordingindustryvspeople.blogspot.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;EMI sues MP3Tunes for engaging in massive free distribution of song files over internet, and devestating copyright infringement, get this, for songs EMI already offers free for downloads online.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check this out .</p>
<p><a href="http://recordingindustryvspeople.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">EMI sues MP3Tunes for engaging in massive free distribution of song files over internet, and devestating copyright infringement, get this, for songs EMI already offers free for downloads online.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dreddsnik</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18020/comment-page-1#comment-927271</link>
		<dc:creator>Dreddsnik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 22:08:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18020#comment-927271</guid>
		<description>&quot; And stop plagerizing:

Dreddsnik Says:  &quot;

 Mr Stalker.

 Personally, I have no problem whatsoever with using Chronoss my original post.
 After all, I got the list second hand from Ray&#039;s site so I &#039;Plagiarized&#039; as well.
 I am grateful that someone else is also on the ball and can get the appropriate 
 posts in the appropriate threads quickly, and that needed to be here.

 Thank you Chronoss for getting that here so fast.
 Use anything that you think is appropriate, as ideas belong
 to no one. ;)

 Spread the word.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; And stop plagerizing:</p>
<p>Dreddsnik Says:  &#8221;</p>
<p> Mr Stalker.</p>
<p> Personally, I have no problem whatsoever with using Chronoss my original post.<br />
 After all, I got the list second hand from Ray&#8217;s site so I &#8216;Plagiarized&#8217; as well.<br />
 I am grateful that someone else is also on the ball and can get the appropriate<br />
 posts in the appropriate threads quickly, and that needed to be here.</p>
<p> Thank you Chronoss for getting that here so fast.<br />
 Use anything that you think is appropriate, as ideas belong<br />
 to no one. <img src='http://www.p2pnet.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p> Spread the word.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chronoss=idiot</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18020/comment-page-1#comment-927170</link>
		<dc:creator>chronoss=idiot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 17:51:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18020#comment-927170</guid>
		<description>And stop plagerizing:

Dreddsnik Says: 

December 26th, 2008 at 1:31 pm 
” Despite the RIAA’s announcement last week that it’s dropping its legal assault, ”

A partial list of the newest cases ( filed AFTER the claimed to have stopped filing cases ) ..

Atlantic Recording v. Williams 08-1710 W.D. Pennsylvania 12/15/08
Sony BMG Music v. Linus 08-14413 S.D. Florida 12/11/08
Arista Records v. Estrada 08-8135 C.D. California 12/10/08
UMG Recordings v. Haralambos 08-8129 C.D. California 12/10/08
SONY BMG Music v. Estrada 08-2682 D. Colorado 12/10/08
Interscope Records v. Doe 6 08-1882 D. Connecticut 12/10/08
Arista Records v. Doe 4 08-1877 D. Connecticut 12/10/08
Interscope Records v. Doe 5 08-1284 D. Connecticut 12/10/08
Interscope Records v. Doe 2 08-1878 D. Connecticut 12/10/08
Interscope Records v. Doe 3 08-1879 D. Connecticut 12/10/08
Capitol Records v. Fowler 08-2141 D. District of Columbia 12/10/08
UMG Recordings v. Mekawi 08-2142 D. District of Columbia 12/10/08
UMG Recordings v. Hensley 08-534 M.D. Florida 12/10/08
Interscope Records v. Jackson 08-544 N.D. Florida 12/10/08
UMG Recordings v. Blueford 08-119 M.D. Georgia 12/10/08
Warner Bros. Records v. Umbaugh 08-118 M.D. Georgia 12/10/08
SONY BMG Music v. Simms 08-3728 N.D. Georgia 12/10/08
Warner Bros. Records v. Wade 08-3727 N.D. Georgia 12/10/08
Capitol Records v. Williams-Ali 08-156 S.D. Iowa 12/10/08
UMG Recordings v. Decort 08-7053 N.D. Illinois 12/10/08
SONY BMG Music v. Shane 08-7055 N.D. Illinois 12/10/08
SONY BMG Music v. Byers 08-189 S.D. Indiana 12/10/08
Capitol Records v. Trusty 08-190 S.D. Indiana 12/10/08
Elektra Entertainment v. Maphet 08-1386 D. Kansas 12/10/08
Atlantic Recording v. Sanderson 08-1385 D. Kansas 12/10/08
UMG Recordings v. Gulledge 08-cv-00973-MHT-TFM M.D. Alabama 12/10/08
Warner Bros. Records Kelley 08-cv-02295-CLS N.D. Alabama 12/10/08
SONY BMG Music v. Van Ornum 08-cv-04205-JLH E.D. Arkansas 12/10/08
Interscope Records v. Tabor 08-cv-03068-JLH W.D. Arkansas 12/10/08
BMG Music v. O’Brien 08-cv-02244-HRH D. Arizona 12/10/08
Priority Records v. Easterling 08-cv-08131-PA-JTL C.D. California 12/10/08
UMG Recordings v. Ibarzabal 08-cv-08136-R-SH C.D. California 12/10/08
Interscope Records v. Doe 4 08-cv-01880-JBA D. Connecticut 12/10/08
Arista Records v. Doe 2 08-cv-01874-CFD D. Connecticut 12/10/08
Arista Records v. Doe 3 08-cv-01876-SRU D. Connecticut 12/10/08
UMG Recordings v. Burmeister 08-cv-02295-MPM-DGB C.D. Illinois 12/10/08

A group that is willing to lie in court has no issues lying to the press, especially press that they
control.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And stop plagerizing:</p>
<p>Dreddsnik Says: </p>
<p>December 26th, 2008 at 1:31 pm<br />
” Despite the RIAA’s announcement last week that it’s dropping its legal assault, ”</p>
<p>A partial list of the newest cases ( filed AFTER the claimed to have stopped filing cases ) ..</p>
<p>Atlantic Recording v. Williams 08-1710 W.D. Pennsylvania 12/15/08<br />
Sony BMG Music v. Linus 08-14413 S.D. Florida 12/11/08<br />
Arista Records v. Estrada 08-8135 C.D. California 12/10/08<br />
UMG Recordings v. Haralambos 08-8129 C.D. California 12/10/08<br />
SONY BMG Music v. Estrada 08-2682 D. Colorado 12/10/08<br />
Interscope Records v. Doe 6 08-1882 D. Connecticut 12/10/08<br />
Arista Records v. Doe 4 08-1877 D. Connecticut 12/10/08<br />
Interscope Records v. Doe 5 08-1284 D. Connecticut 12/10/08<br />
Interscope Records v. Doe 2 08-1878 D. Connecticut 12/10/08<br />
Interscope Records v. Doe 3 08-1879 D. Connecticut 12/10/08<br />
Capitol Records v. Fowler 08-2141 D. District of Columbia 12/10/08<br />
UMG Recordings v. Mekawi 08-2142 D. District of Columbia 12/10/08<br />
UMG Recordings v. Hensley 08-534 M.D. Florida 12/10/08<br />
Interscope Records v. Jackson 08-544 N.D. Florida 12/10/08<br />
UMG Recordings v. Blueford 08-119 M.D. Georgia 12/10/08<br />
Warner Bros. Records v. Umbaugh 08-118 M.D. Georgia 12/10/08<br />
SONY BMG Music v. Simms 08-3728 N.D. Georgia 12/10/08<br />
Warner Bros. Records v. Wade 08-3727 N.D. Georgia 12/10/08<br />
Capitol Records v. Williams-Ali 08-156 S.D. Iowa 12/10/08<br />
UMG Recordings v. Decort 08-7053 N.D. Illinois 12/10/08<br />
SONY BMG Music v. Shane 08-7055 N.D. Illinois 12/10/08<br />
SONY BMG Music v. Byers 08-189 S.D. Indiana 12/10/08<br />
Capitol Records v. Trusty 08-190 S.D. Indiana 12/10/08<br />
Elektra Entertainment v. Maphet 08-1386 D. Kansas 12/10/08<br />
Atlantic Recording v. Sanderson 08-1385 D. Kansas 12/10/08<br />
UMG Recordings v. Gulledge 08-cv-00973-MHT-TFM M.D. Alabama 12/10/08<br />
Warner Bros. Records Kelley 08-cv-02295-CLS N.D. Alabama 12/10/08<br />
SONY BMG Music v. Van Ornum 08-cv-04205-JLH E.D. Arkansas 12/10/08<br />
Interscope Records v. Tabor 08-cv-03068-JLH W.D. Arkansas 12/10/08<br />
BMG Music v. O’Brien 08-cv-02244-HRH D. Arizona 12/10/08<br />
Priority Records v. Easterling 08-cv-08131-PA-JTL C.D. California 12/10/08<br />
UMG Recordings v. Ibarzabal 08-cv-08136-R-SH C.D. California 12/10/08<br />
Interscope Records v. Doe 4 08-cv-01880-JBA D. Connecticut 12/10/08<br />
Arista Records v. Doe 2 08-cv-01874-CFD D. Connecticut 12/10/08<br />
Arista Records v. Doe 3 08-cv-01876-SRU D. Connecticut 12/10/08<br />
UMG Recordings v. Burmeister 08-cv-02295-MPM-DGB C.D. Illinois 12/10/08</p>
<p>A group that is willing to lie in court has no issues lying to the press, especially press that they<br />
control.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chronoss=idiot</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18020/comment-page-1#comment-927159</link>
		<dc:creator>chronoss=idiot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 17:36:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18020#comment-927159</guid>
		<description>balderdash chronoss2009 stop stealing bells pvrs</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>balderdash chronoss2009 stop stealing bells pvrs</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gene</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18020/comment-page-1#comment-927102</link>
		<dc:creator>gene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 15:04:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18020#comment-927102</guid>
		<description>Both the RIAA and Directv sued a total of 60,000 people many of who were innocent. Even though they knew of their innocence, they collected money from them then locked them into an agreement not to tell or not to report them for the false court complaint. The US justice system refused to help those falsely accused and failed to stop the suits even though they knew the court complaints were bogus. To bring the justice system back into the fold of protecting innocent people, those falsely sued need to send a strong message. The next time they are a juror before a court, do just what Justice did to them. Ignore Justice. Cast your juror vote against justice. The next time you are a witness, do not come foreword. This way eventually Justice will learn what it is like to be ignored when crimes are committed against you by huge companies you never had a chance against. Huge corporations should not be immune from braking the laws just like the consumer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both the RIAA and Directv sued a total of 60,000 people many of who were innocent. Even though they knew of their innocence, they collected money from them then locked them into an agreement not to tell or not to report them for the false court complaint. The US justice system refused to help those falsely accused and failed to stop the suits even though they knew the court complaints were bogus. To bring the justice system back into the fold of protecting innocent people, those falsely sued need to send a strong message. The next time they are a juror before a court, do just what Justice did to them. Ignore Justice. Cast your juror vote against justice. The next time you are a witness, do not come foreword. This way eventually Justice will learn what it is like to be ignored when crimes are committed against you by huge companies you never had a chance against. Huge corporations should not be immune from braking the laws just like the consumer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chronoss2009</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18020/comment-page-1#comment-927058</link>
		<dc:creator>chronoss2009</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 12:50:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18020#comment-927058</guid>
		<description>add to your article what privacy violations new york is doing on Canadians and add that email thing form bell as an attempt to shut up people from the truth of BELL tv and BELL sympatico&#039;s doings, and you get the idea, Microsoft owns a part of BCE, and they made agreements with MPAA and RIAA.

What better time to get rid of MS on govt computers in Canada that would save over 2 BILLION A YEAR in economic troubled times, create employment as in migrations ( infrastructure as we know the buzzword ) and create MapleLeafLinux ( a canuck distro)as we know it.

Does the military of Canada want to save millions and get that latest hardware , GO LINUX you boneheads, save csh and get the equipment our troops deserve.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>add to your article what privacy violations new york is doing on Canadians and add that email thing form bell as an attempt to shut up people from the truth of BELL tv and BELL sympatico&#8217;s doings, and you get the idea, Microsoft owns a part of BCE, and they made agreements with MPAA and RIAA.</p>
<p>What better time to get rid of MS on govt computers in Canada that would save over 2 BILLION A YEAR in economic troubled times, create employment as in migrations ( infrastructure as we know the buzzword ) and create MapleLeafLinux ( a canuck distro)as we know it.</p>
<p>Does the military of Canada want to save millions and get that latest hardware , GO LINUX you boneheads, save csh and get the equipment our troops deserve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chronoss2009</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18020/comment-page-1#comment-927053</link>
		<dc:creator>chronoss2009</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 12:45:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18020#comment-927053</guid>
		<description>” Despite the RIAA’s announcement last week that it’s dropping its legal assault, ”

A partial list of the newest cases ( filed AFTER the claimed to have stopped filing cases ) ..

Atlantic Recording v. Williams 08-1710 W.D. Pennsylvania 12/15/08
Sony BMG Music v. Linus 08-14413 S.D. Florida 12/11/08
Arista Records v. Estrada 08-8135 C.D. California 12/10/08
UMG Recordings v. Haralambos 08-8129 C.D. California 12/10/08
SONY BMG Music v. Estrada 08-2682 D. Colorado 12/10/08
Interscope Records v. Doe 6 08-1882 D. Connecticut 12/10/08
Arista Records v. Doe 4 08-1877 D. Connecticut 12/10/08
Interscope Records v. Doe 5 08-1284 D. Connecticut 12/10/08
Interscope Records v. Doe 2 08-1878 D. Connecticut 12/10/08
Interscope Records v. Doe 3 08-1879 D. Connecticut 12/10/08
Capitol Records v. Fowler 08-2141 D. District of Columbia 12/10/08
UMG Recordings v. Mekawi 08-2142 D. District of Columbia 12/10/08
UMG Recordings v. Hensley 08-534 M.D. Florida 12/10/08
Interscope Records v. Jackson 08-544 N.D. Florida 12/10/08
UMG Recordings v. Blueford 08-119 M.D. Georgia 12/10/08
Warner Bros. Records v. Umbaugh 08-118 M.D. Georgia 12/10/08
SONY BMG Music v. Simms 08-3728 N.D. Georgia 12/10/08
Warner Bros. Records v. Wade 08-3727 N.D. Georgia 12/10/08
Capitol Records v. Williams-Ali 08-156 S.D. Iowa 12/10/08
UMG Recordings v. Decort 08-7053 N.D. Illinois 12/10/08
SONY BMG Music v. Shane 08-7055 N.D. Illinois 12/10/08
SONY BMG Music v. Byers 08-189 S.D. Indiana 12/10/08
Capitol Records v. Trusty 08-190 S.D. Indiana 12/10/08
Elektra Entertainment v. Maphet 08-1386 D. Kansas 12/10/08
Atlantic Recording v. Sanderson 08-1385 D. Kansas 12/10/08
UMG Recordings v. Gulledge 08-cv-00973-MHT-TFM M.D. Alabama 12/10/08
Warner Bros. Records Kelley 08-cv-02295-CLS N.D. Alabama 12/10/08
SONY BMG Music v. Van Ornum 08-cv-04205-JLH E.D. Arkansas 12/10/08
Interscope Records v. Tabor 08-cv-03068-JLH W.D. Arkansas 12/10/08
BMG Music v. O’Brien 08-cv-02244-HRH D. Arizona 12/10/08
Priority Records v. Easterling 08-cv-08131-PA-JTL C.D. California 12/10/08
UMG Recordings v. Ibarzabal 08-cv-08136-R-SH C.D. California 12/10/08
Interscope Records v. Doe 4 08-cv-01880-JBA D. Connecticut 12/10/08
Arista Records v. Doe 2 08-cv-01874-CFD D. Connecticut 12/10/08
Arista Records v. Doe 3 08-cv-01876-SRU D. Connecticut 12/10/08
UMG Recordings v. Burmeister 08-cv-02295-MPM-DGB C.D. Illinois 12/10/08

A group that is willing to lie in court has no issues lying to the press, especially press that they
control.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>” Despite the RIAA’s announcement last week that it’s dropping its legal assault, ”</p>
<p>A partial list of the newest cases ( filed AFTER the claimed to have stopped filing cases ) ..</p>
<p>Atlantic Recording v. Williams 08-1710 W.D. Pennsylvania 12/15/08<br />
Sony BMG Music v. Linus 08-14413 S.D. Florida 12/11/08<br />
Arista Records v. Estrada 08-8135 C.D. California 12/10/08<br />
UMG Recordings v. Haralambos 08-8129 C.D. California 12/10/08<br />
SONY BMG Music v. Estrada 08-2682 D. Colorado 12/10/08<br />
Interscope Records v. Doe 6 08-1882 D. Connecticut 12/10/08<br />
Arista Records v. Doe 4 08-1877 D. Connecticut 12/10/08<br />
Interscope Records v. Doe 5 08-1284 D. Connecticut 12/10/08<br />
Interscope Records v. Doe 2 08-1878 D. Connecticut 12/10/08<br />
Interscope Records v. Doe 3 08-1879 D. Connecticut 12/10/08<br />
Capitol Records v. Fowler 08-2141 D. District of Columbia 12/10/08<br />
UMG Recordings v. Mekawi 08-2142 D. District of Columbia 12/10/08<br />
UMG Recordings v. Hensley 08-534 M.D. Florida 12/10/08<br />
Interscope Records v. Jackson 08-544 N.D. Florida 12/10/08<br />
UMG Recordings v. Blueford 08-119 M.D. Georgia 12/10/08<br />
Warner Bros. Records v. Umbaugh 08-118 M.D. Georgia 12/10/08<br />
SONY BMG Music v. Simms 08-3728 N.D. Georgia 12/10/08<br />
Warner Bros. Records v. Wade 08-3727 N.D. Georgia 12/10/08<br />
Capitol Records v. Williams-Ali 08-156 S.D. Iowa 12/10/08<br />
UMG Recordings v. Decort 08-7053 N.D. Illinois 12/10/08<br />
SONY BMG Music v. Shane 08-7055 N.D. Illinois 12/10/08<br />
SONY BMG Music v. Byers 08-189 S.D. Indiana 12/10/08<br />
Capitol Records v. Trusty 08-190 S.D. Indiana 12/10/08<br />
Elektra Entertainment v. Maphet 08-1386 D. Kansas 12/10/08<br />
Atlantic Recording v. Sanderson 08-1385 D. Kansas 12/10/08<br />
UMG Recordings v. Gulledge 08-cv-00973-MHT-TFM M.D. Alabama 12/10/08<br />
Warner Bros. Records Kelley 08-cv-02295-CLS N.D. Alabama 12/10/08<br />
SONY BMG Music v. Van Ornum 08-cv-04205-JLH E.D. Arkansas 12/10/08<br />
Interscope Records v. Tabor 08-cv-03068-JLH W.D. Arkansas 12/10/08<br />
BMG Music v. O’Brien 08-cv-02244-HRH D. Arizona 12/10/08<br />
Priority Records v. Easterling 08-cv-08131-PA-JTL C.D. California 12/10/08<br />
UMG Recordings v. Ibarzabal 08-cv-08136-R-SH C.D. California 12/10/08<br />
Interscope Records v. Doe 4 08-cv-01880-JBA D. Connecticut 12/10/08<br />
Arista Records v. Doe 2 08-cv-01874-CFD D. Connecticut 12/10/08<br />
Arista Records v. Doe 3 08-cv-01876-SRU D. Connecticut 12/10/08<br />
UMG Recordings v. Burmeister 08-cv-02295-MPM-DGB C.D. Illinois 12/10/08</p>
<p>A group that is willing to lie in court has no issues lying to the press, especially press that they<br />
control.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
