<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How the RIAA IDs student &#8216;pirates&#8217;: redux</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18062/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18062</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 18:40:56 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dreddsnik</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18062/comment-page-1#comment-933764</link>
		<dc:creator>Dreddsnik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 18:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18062#comment-933764</guid>
		<description>&quot; Who uses Limewire? it would be pretty funny if they downloaded a malware-ridden mp3 at that conference &quot;

 MP3&#039;s can&#039;t be &#039;Malware Ridden&#039;
 Their very nature makes that impossible, which is also why
 ordinary MP3&#039;s can&#039;t be DRM&#039;d.

 Rules of Limewire ..

 1. Do not share any folders.
     Some won&#039;t allow to DL because of this, but just as many won&#039;t care.
 2. Turn off the ability of chatters to browse directories.
 3. Turn off the ability to upload.
 4. For Music, download ONLY .mp3 extensions. These can&#039;t contain malicious code
     or DRM. ANY DRM capable file has code that can be used for malicious purposes,
     the worst are .WMA ( windows media ). Don&#039;t DL any .zip .rar .exe etc .... ONLY .mp3
 5. for Video, only DL .avi .mpg .mp4, for the same reasons as outlined above.
     by their very nature they can&#039;t be DRM, thus can&#039;t be hacked maliciously.

 These came rules apply to Kazaa, Shareazaa or any mainstream P2P app.
 Rules 4 and 5 apply to Bittorrent sites as well.

 Please feel free to correct or add anything I missed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; Who uses Limewire? it would be pretty funny if they downloaded a malware-ridden mp3 at that conference &#8221;</p>
<p> MP3&#8217;s can&#8217;t be &#8216;Malware Ridden&#8217;<br />
 Their very nature makes that impossible, which is also why<br />
 ordinary MP3&#8217;s can&#8217;t be DRM&#8217;d.</p>
<p> Rules of Limewire ..</p>
<p> 1. Do not share any folders.<br />
     Some won&#8217;t allow to DL because of this, but just as many won&#8217;t care.<br />
 2. Turn off the ability of chatters to browse directories.<br />
 3. Turn off the ability to upload.<br />
 4. For Music, download ONLY .mp3 extensions. These can&#8217;t contain malicious code<br />
     or DRM. ANY DRM capable file has code that can be used for malicious purposes,<br />
     the worst are .WMA ( windows media ). Don&#8217;t DL any .zip .rar .exe etc &#8230;. ONLY .mp3<br />
 5. for Video, only DL .avi .mpg .mp4, for the same reasons as outlined above.<br />
     by their very nature they can&#8217;t be DRM, thus can&#8217;t be hacked maliciously.</p>
<p> These came rules apply to Kazaa, Shareazaa or any mainstream P2P app.<br />
 Rules 4 and 5 apply to Bittorrent sites as well.</p>
<p> Please feel free to correct or add anything I missed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Comeoncomcast</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18062/comment-page-1#comment-932888</link>
		<dc:creator>Comeoncomcast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 21:06:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18062#comment-932888</guid>
		<description>lol

Who uses Limewire? it would be pretty funny if they downloaded a malware-ridden mp3 at that conference :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol</p>
<p>Who uses Limewire? it would be pretty funny if they downloaded a malware-ridden mp3 at that conference <img src='http://www.p2pnet.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cody</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18062/comment-page-1#comment-932713</link>
		<dc:creator>Cody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 17:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18062#comment-932713</guid>
		<description>.....&quot;who would speak only on condition of anonymity because of concern that he would receive hate e-mail,”


now that&#039;s totally untrue !!!  give it to me and i&#039;ll proove it 

:evil</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;..&#8221;who would speak only on condition of anonymity because of concern that he would receive hate e-mail,”</p>
<p>now that&#8217;s totally untrue !!!  give it to me and i&#8217;ll proove it </p>
<p>:evil</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: surfer</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18062/comment-page-1#comment-932712</link>
		<dc:creator>surfer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 17:10:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18062#comment-932712</guid>
		<description>I agree with Dreddnik, completely. It would actually be nigh impossible to NOT target class c IPs, and again hes correct, targeting college students who by all rights probably have money (read parents money), and can be grouped together in ex parte. As if they were all in collusion. &#039;Randomly&#039; wandering the net for offenders would lead to &#039;nobody profitable to send the letters to&#039;. The ISPs demand a court order to divulge information, colleges do not, bang, instant target.

They are blatently targeting a demographic thats easy to leverage (use the university against them), have money (if your in college you have money right?), and fear liability (parents/teachers find out about it) or could endanger their entire life (thrown out of college) !!

And if they portent randomness, then again, why has Harvard been avoided? Because they KNOW its sham litigation, FOR A FACT!

Beat down the easiest, most culpable and defenseless examples you can find. College students that probably DON&#039;T even know that they are sharing music folders, or infringing copyright (which is a civil matter, regardless of how many times the MAFIAA claims its a crime) that have money, and threaten to destroy their future!

Slimy money-grubbing bastards, every single one of them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Dreddnik, completely. It would actually be nigh impossible to NOT target class c IPs, and again hes correct, targeting college students who by all rights probably have money (read parents money), and can be grouped together in ex parte. As if they were all in collusion. &#8216;Randomly&#8217; wandering the net for offenders would lead to &#8216;nobody profitable to send the letters to&#8217;. The ISPs demand a court order to divulge information, colleges do not, bang, instant target.</p>
<p>They are blatently targeting a demographic thats easy to leverage (use the university against them), have money (if your in college you have money right?), and fear liability (parents/teachers find out about it) or could endanger their entire life (thrown out of college) !!</p>
<p>And if they portent randomness, then again, why has Harvard been avoided? Because they KNOW its sham litigation, FOR A FACT!</p>
<p>Beat down the easiest, most culpable and defenseless examples you can find. College students that probably DON&#8217;T even know that they are sharing music folders, or infringing copyright (which is a civil matter, regardless of how many times the MAFIAA claims its a crime) that have money, and threaten to destroy their future!</p>
<p>Slimy money-grubbing bastards, every single one of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18062/comment-page-1#comment-932664</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 15:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18062#comment-932664</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m gonna start leaving sharing blank text files with song names</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m gonna start leaving sharing blank text files with song names</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dreddnik</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18062/comment-page-1#comment-932633</link>
		<dc:creator>Dreddnik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 15:07:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18062#comment-932633</guid>
		<description>&quot; “We have no capability of targeting any school at all,” she has him saying, also arguing it’s a large “misperception” among university administrators that individual colleges are being picked on.

“Technically we can’t do it,” he said. &quot;

 Can these guys EVER tell the truth ?

 &#039;Technically&#039; it&#039;s EASY to do that. Easier than going after regular ISP customers.

 EVERY university has reserved a &#039;block&#039; of IP addresses.
 All of those addresses will be in the same subgroup.
 This same method is used by business.
 That&#039;s why firewalls like PeerGaurdian can block sequential addresse that all belong to the
 same corporate &#039;spy&#039; companies.

 It doesn&#039;t take much effort to find out what addresse the university holds, and single them out
 as targets. 

 Do you REALLY think its accidental that college students and colleges are getting sued the most ?
 It has nothing to do with the lie &#039; so many college students download .. blagh blah &#039; as it does
 with Universities are easy to bully and college students have no means to fight back.

 It is EXTREMEMLY telling that Harvard has never shown up on the lawsuits. does ANYONE
 believe for 1 second that NO Harvard students ever use P2P software for music ?

 No , this puff piece is to ease public relations and is complete fiction.
 They CAN and DO target COLLEGE STUDENTS because they are less likely or able to fight back.
 It is absolutely technologically feasible to do so.
 It it EASIER technologically to do than to target the average ISP user.

 Fucking liars AGAIN, and the mainstream press onve again gobble it up without any reasearch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; “We have no capability of targeting any school at all,” she has him saying, also arguing it’s a large “misperception” among university administrators that individual colleges are being picked on.</p>
<p>“Technically we can’t do it,” he said. &#8221;</p>
<p> Can these guys EVER tell the truth ?</p>
<p> &#8216;Technically&#8217; it&#8217;s EASY to do that. Easier than going after regular ISP customers.</p>
<p> EVERY university has reserved a &#8216;block&#8217; of IP addresses.<br />
 All of those addresses will be in the same subgroup.<br />
 This same method is used by business.<br />
 That&#8217;s why firewalls like PeerGaurdian can block sequential addresse that all belong to the<br />
 same corporate &#8217;spy&#8217; companies.</p>
<p> It doesn&#8217;t take much effort to find out what addresse the university holds, and single them out<br />
 as targets. </p>
<p> Do you REALLY think its accidental that college students and colleges are getting sued the most ?<br />
 It has nothing to do with the lie &#8216; so many college students download .. blagh blah &#8216; as it does<br />
 with Universities are easy to bully and college students have no means to fight back.</p>
<p> It is EXTREMEMLY telling that Harvard has never shown up on the lawsuits. does ANYONE<br />
 believe for 1 second that NO Harvard students ever use P2P software for music ?</p>
<p> No , this puff piece is to ease public relations and is complete fiction.<br />
 They CAN and DO target COLLEGE STUDENTS because they are less likely or able to fight back.<br />
 It is absolutely technologically feasible to do so.<br />
 It it EASIER technologically to do than to target the average ISP user.</p>
<p> Fucking liars AGAIN, and the mainstream press onve again gobble it up without any reasearch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
