Bono embarrasses the New York Times
p2pnet news view Music:- “Notes From the Chairman”
Chairman? Give us a break.
That’s the header to inane and totally pointless fartings from U2 mouth BaloneyO, published without apology by the New York Times.
Bob Lefsetz saw it too.
“I don’t sing and Bono shouldn’t write,”" he says, going on »»»
In an era where Malcolm Gladwell reports that it takes 10,000 hours of practice to be any good, what made the “New York Times” believe that Bono could write opinion pieces worth reading? He can come over to my house any time and serenade me with “I Still Haven’t Found What I’m Looking For”, but I’ll ignore what he puts down via his word processor, unless I want to laugh and be reminded that rock stars are just like us, only richer.
I mean read about his New Year’s Eve. Doesn’t sound that different from mine. Or yours, probably. So you’re drunk in a bar… WHOOPEE! And then you start rambling like a high school sophomore about your brushes with fame. Yup, that’s what David Letterman calls them, when the ordinary meet the extraordinary. But Letterman plays it for entertainment value, whereas Bono’s playing it for truth.
But let’s not focus on his writing, how about Bono the VC! Elevation Partners is single-handedly keeping Palm alive. But you can’t find a tech writer who believes the company will survive. I mean how many people have been itching to show you their new Centro recently? Has ANYBODY told you about Palm’s new models, just announced?
It’s about mobile e-mail on a BlackBerry or apps on an iPhone. A Palm is like a Haircut 100 record. A hit once, but no one even wants to go to the reunion show.
This is the emperor’s new clothes. Why did the “New York Times” make this deal? Didn’t Bono have to submit any samples? Couldn’t they have rejected this piss-poor piece before they printed it? Can’t they cancel the deal now?
Musicians complain that today everybody plays. That they’re competing with amateurs employing GarageBand and posting their substandard material on MySpace. The good stuff just can’t get TRACTION! I’ve got to believe a ton of “Times” writers are tearing their hair out today. Their jobs are in jeopardy, but a bunch of ink can be used up by this poser? It’s like letting a Little Leaguer take swings in a Major League game!
But you’re sitting there snickering, saying who gives a shit about the “New York Times” anyway. You’re right. The “New York Times” is about as prepared for the Net future as the record companies were. And you know how that played out. Putting Bono in the paper is like a label head insisting that CDs are great, that the older generation loves them!
The younger generation doesn’t give a shit about U2. Maybe because the band’s been playing it safe, repeating itself throughout this decade. Rumor has it that they’re back to experimentation, testing limits like they did with “Achtung Baby”. I hope this is true, that’s my second favorite U2 album, and when I first heard it, I didn’t understand it. But it demanded further listening. And it revealed itself to me.
I can’t say that I fully understand Bono’s piece today. But I’m not interested in rereading it ad infinitum. Because I don’t
like the tone. It’s not hole up in the bunker and create something new and different, that challenges society, rather it’s about parading. No different from Paris Hilton saying LOOK AT ME!
But Paris does it a lot better.
But we don’t think Paris has any artistic talent. And we’re supposed to believe that Bono does.
Well, his image took a big hit today.
You’re better off reading the playlist of the guy with cancer. That’s a lot more heartfelt and interesting… AND COMPREHENSIBLE!
Bob Lefsetz - The Lefsetz Letter
Use free p2pnet newsfeeds for your site. It’s really easy!
Subscribe to p2pnet.net | | rss feed: http://p2pnet.net/p2p.rss | | Mobile - http://p2pnet.net/index-wml.php
Net access blocked by government restrictions? Use Psiphon from the Citizen Lab at the University of Toronto. Go here for details.
January 11th, 2009 at 6:18 pm
now say ta support p2p and were ok wiyj jim , after all he got filthy rich via old system
January 11th, 2009 at 6:27 pm
Well said! Bono is not a good writer. There’s another hilarious post about this column here: http://davidcano23.blogspot.com/2009/01/bono-biggest-douche-ever.html
January 11th, 2009 at 6:51 pm
Great pic of the prick.
January 12th, 2009 at 7:54 am
As an irony , the above shite fest of `journalism`is slightly marred by the crap about Palm and making the same point again and er.. again . If you want to make a criticism , make it interesting or funny or comprehensible , as I said its an irony that you slag off Bono for talking poo . For the record I think Bono is a buffoon .
January 12th, 2009 at 11:07 am
lefsetz is an idiot that continuously ignores fact or the need for any original thought or style in his writings. like he should talk.
bono has a beautiful writing style, and we all know he has opinions. this was just an intro… im sure his future writings will be worth the read.
if he had come out with his first piece talking about Africa and world peace, he woulda got ripped for that too.
i think it was a good first piece….
February 23rd, 2009 at 7:37 pm
I think Bono has let his ego go way out of bounds. Now he thinks he can do anything. Okay musically, and he does good concerts for charitable events. But I am so weary of movie and rock stars thinking that just because they are rich and famous they can do anything. Of course he’s entitled to his opinions, just as I am. But being rich doesn’t make his opinions any better than mine, and no one wants to read anyone’s opinions unless they’re written well and have meaningful content. This emperor definitely needs some clothes.