RIAA chickens out in Austin,Texas
p2pnet news view | RIAA News:- In November, 2004, several judges in the federal court in Austin, Texas, got together and ordered the RIAA to cease and desist its practice of joining multiple ‘John Does’ in a single case.
The RIAA blithely ignored the order, continuing the illegal practice for the next four years, but steering clear of Austin.
In 2008, however, circumstances conspired to force the record companies back to that venue.
In Arista v Does 1-22, in Providence, Rhode Island, they were hoping to get the student identities from the College of Rhode Island.
But after the first round, they learned the college wasn’t the ISP. Rather, the ISP was Austin-based Apogee Telecom Inc, meaning the RIAA would have to serve its subpoena in Austin.
The RIAA did just that, but Apogee, unlike so many other ISP’s, didn’t turn over its subscribers’ identities in response to the subpoena, instead filing objections.
This meant the RIAA would have had to go to court to try to get the Court to overrule Apogee’s objections.
Instead, it opted to withdraw the subpoena and drop its case.”
Ray Beckerman – Recording Industry vs The People
Use free p2pnet newsfeeds for your site. It’s really easy!
Subscribe to p2pnet.net | | rss feed: http://p2pnet.net/p2p.rss | | Mobile – http://p2pnet.net/index-wml.php
Net access blocked by government restrictions? Use Psiphon from the Citizen Lab at the University of Toronto. Go here for details.






January 14th, 2009 at 10:42 am
slowly but surely, the world is standing up to these deep pocketed slimeballs, one by one by one by one.
thanks Apogee.
January 14th, 2009 at 12:09 pm
http://www.apogeenet.net/myresnet/articles/file_sharing.jsp
January 14th, 2009 at 12:20 pm
lol, that is classic.
January 14th, 2009 at 1:03 pm
copyright infringement is not ‘against the law’, its a civil infraction, lamescream media CONTINUES to parrot this idiocy.
January 14th, 2009 at 1:12 pm
lol
i vote the riaa as the loser of the year for 2008
January 15th, 2009 at 4:38 am
All ISP’s have a responsibility to protect their clients privacy. Any person who was betrayed by their ISP to the RIAA should sue their ISP for breach of privacy.