Canada / EU FTA consultation deadline Jan 20
p2pnet news view | P2P | Politics:- A possible Canada / European Union (EU) Free Trade Agreement (FTA) is in the works, says Ottawa copyright lawyer Howard Knopf.
For whatever reason, “the Government is calling it a ‘comprehensive economic agreement’ and not an FTA,” he states.
On December 20, 2008, “the Canadian Government announced a consultation process,” he says, going on »»»
There is a deadline to comment of next Tuesday, January 20, 2009.
There is a lengthy paper setting the stage for the many issues that could arise in these negotiations. There is a ten page discussion of IP issues.
The IP discussion does not explain the potential complexities and controversies that could arise. The Government of Canada expects a response from the pubic by January 20, 2009. This is somewhat astonishing, given the announcement of consultation only on December 20, 2009 – five days before Christmas. It is unclear why this extremely short deadline is in effect.
There is probably little awareness of the deadline. True, the notice was published in the Canada Gazette. But, as the late Gordon F. Henderson said, the best way to keep a secret in Ottawa can be to publish it in the Canada Gazette.
From an IP standpoint, there are some obvious opportunities and pitfalls depending on point of view:
1. The EU is has a life plus 70 year copyright term and is heading towards a 95 year term for sound recordings. The EU will clearly not harmonize downwards to meet Canada on this. Canada will be under great pressure to harmonize upwards to these lengthy terms. This would clearly be highly controversial in Canada.
2. The EU will doubtless press for quick Canadian ratification of the 1996 WIPO internet treaties, even though the EU has not ratified these treaties to date and has been claiming that such ratification is imminent for many years.
3. The EU is very aggressive on appellations d`origine or geographical indications. Does Canada want to take away the right of its cheese manufacturers, retailers and restaurants to sell domestic parmesan cheese, for example?
4. The EU has a very complex labyrinth of laws concerning parallel imports or grey market products. Essentially, they amount to a strong Fortress Europe regime to keep parallel imports out but such products are allowed to flow freely within the EU if they have been imported with the appropriate consent, whatever that may mean. If goods can flow freely between Canada and the EU, the EU will probably want Canada to drastically change its laws to tighten up the possibility of parallel imports into Canada because Canada could become a back door to Europe. This could prove costly for Canadian consumers, because IP has hitherto been essentially ineffective to block parallel imports of consumer goods into Canada, except for books. The EU is generally a very high price market for the types of goods that are subject to parallel trade, perhaps is large part because of its IP policies on parallel imports.
5. The EU has much more a much active antitrust policy and enforcement mind set and mechanism than Canada, and is extremely cognizant that IP rights are prone to abuse and other anticompetitive practices.
6. The EU will no doubt press for expanded ex officio border actions without Court orders that could interfere with legitimate trade and may not be necessary or desirable from a Canadian standpoint. This effort will no doubt be linked to ACTA.
7. The EU also has an unfortunate database protection regime, which has led to some bad results in terms of extraction of information. Whether the EU will press for this remains to be seen.
Howard Knopf – Excess Copyright
[Knopf is an Ottawa-based copyright lawyer who's been lead counsel on legal challenges both at the Copyright Board and in the Courts against the excesses of the music industry establishment. He's regularly quoted in the mainstream media and acted against the CRIA in the file sharing litigation, and continues to act against the CPCC, in which the CRIA is still a major stakeholder, on the levy front.]
January , 2009
Use free p2pnet newsfeeds for your site. It`s really easy!
Subscribe to p2pnet.net | | rss feed: http://p2pnet.net/p2p.rss | | Mobile – http://p2pnet.net/index-wml.php
Net access blocked by government restrictions? Use Psiphon from the Citizen Lab at the University of Toronto. Go here for details.
January 18th, 2009 at 1:23 pm
As I understand what the European Commission DG Trade says, substantive law is not in the package. Otherwise the DG Trade will be blown away by Parliament. Even for criminal sanctions the Commission probably lacks the competence. So it will be EU-IPRED1 and Customs. The chance would be to get the EU to adopt tighter definitions on “commercial scale”. IPRED1 was a total mess, pushed through by Vivendi.
January 20th, 2009 at 10:37 pm
this is a very nasty situation for Canadians,if allowed to follow thru to completion. but then how can it go on jan 20th,as we have no sitting government?? remember they took a holiday till near the end of the month,and isn’t the budget the big issue? not some”shaft Canadians”treaty with some 3rd rate european commision!! if it goes thru then it means we are being governed by europeans,and not by Canadians,i guess!!