<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Burden of Proof and the RIAA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18230/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18230</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:11:09 -0300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gene</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18230/comment-page-1#comment-946470</link>
		<dc:creator>Gene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 14:23:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18230#comment-946470</guid>
		<description>An account holder is not necessarily the downloaded. Both the RIAA and Directv state in there lawsuits that the named person did something which harmed them. The problem is by the purchase of a legal device or some unknown person using a network is not proof of harm. So while the lawsuit always states the named person harmed them, it lacks any proof. Both Directv and the RIAA know this but file anyway knowing what they claim is not true. It is fraud because they then profit from this filing against an innocent person. It is unlawful for someone to sue another on the basis of a complaint one knows to be false and then from from such a false filing. The justice system is permitting these crimes as they will not enforce the fraud laws. As a consequence, those innocent people sued need to employ Jury Nullification. The next time they are a juror, ignore justice like justice ignored them. While repulsive, it is far worse for justice to ignore a crime victim then it is for a crime victim to ignore justice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An account holder is not necessarily the downloaded. Both the RIAA and Directv state in there lawsuits that the named person did something which harmed them. The problem is by the purchase of a legal device or some unknown person using a network is not proof of harm. So while the lawsuit always states the named person harmed them, it lacks any proof. Both Directv and the RIAA know this but file anyway knowing what they claim is not true. It is fraud because they then profit from this filing against an innocent person. It is unlawful for someone to sue another on the basis of a complaint one knows to be false and then from from such a false filing. The justice system is permitting these crimes as they will not enforce the fraud laws. As a consequence, those innocent people sued need to employ Jury Nullification. The next time they are a juror, ignore justice like justice ignored them. While repulsive, it is far worse for justice to ignore a crime victim then it is for a crime victim to ignore justice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: surfer</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18230/comment-page-1#comment-945446</link>
		<dc:creator>surfer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 18:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18230#comment-945446</guid>
		<description>http://beckermanlegal.com/pdf/?file=/Lawyer_Copyright_Internet_Law/atlantic_williams_090108MotDismissMemoLaw.pdf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://beckermanlegal.com/pdf/?file=/Lawyer_Copyright_Internet_Law/atlantic_williams_090108MotDismissMemoLaw.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://beckermanlegal.com/pdf/?file=/Lawyer_Copyright_Internet_Law/atlantic_williams_090108MotDismissMemoLaw.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: surfer</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18230/comment-page-1#comment-945444</link>
		<dc:creator>surfer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 18:48:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18230#comment-945444</guid>
		<description>you should read her motion to dismiss, it should be boilerplate for every defendant accused by the RIAA, it is a beautiful piece of legalese.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you should read her motion to dismiss, it should be boilerplate for every defendant accused by the RIAA, it is a beautiful piece of legalese.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


