<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft Songsmith thingy transformed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18379/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18379</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:11:09 -0300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18379/comment-page-1#comment-958012</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 20:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18379#comment-958012</guid>
		<description>Hey Henry:

&quot;If &#039;songsmith&#039; would have been produced by any other company but Microsoft ...&quot;

... it wouldn&#039;t have gotten past first base.

Cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Henry:</p>
<p>&#8220;If &#8217;songsmith&#8217; would have been produced by any other company but Microsoft &#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8230; it wouldn&#8217;t have gotten past first base.</p>
<p>Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henry Emrich</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18379/comment-page-1#comment-958011</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry Emrich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 20:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18379#comment-958011</guid>
		<description>Actually, I never found Microsoft Songsmith&#039;s thing to be &quot;totally useless&quot;.
From a compositional point of view, it&#039;s pretty much like the Auto-Rhythm feature keyboards have had for about twenty years (even down to the General Midi sound quality!)

   It&#039;s not specifically even a &quot;karaoke thingy&quot; either.  Karaoke machines don&#039;t track incoming vocals and attempt to build (admittedly stereotypical) harmony lines around them.

   Gotta take the opposite side here (again) just like with the &quot;she-happens-to-be-a-scientologist-so-we-boycott-her-show&quot; idiocy).  If &quot;songsmith&quot; would have been produced by any other company but Microsoft, it would either not been deemed newsworthy, or you&#039;d have thought his was pretty cool from the beginning.

Actually, as much of an open-source/&quot;Free&quot; software advocate as I am, I gotta hand it to Microsoft: their stuff at least tends to be user-friendly to some degree, rather than the overtly &quot;user-hostile&quot; RTFM nonsense in the Linux scene.  The GUI interface was invented what, 30 years ago or more, and yet they&#039;re only NOW getting the GUIs to be good in various Linux distros, in favor of intentionally-cryptic, overly terse Command-line usage.  Sorry, but the primary reason Linux hasn&#039;t penetrated more on desktop usage etc. is because they ignored the &quot;end-user&quot; experience.  Microsoft didn&#039;t, which is one of the few things they&#039;ve actually done right.

   Okay, time to wander off again, and wait for the flaming to begin.

Ciao, Y&#039;all!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I never found Microsoft Songsmith&#8217;s thing to be &#8220;totally useless&#8221;.<br />
From a compositional point of view, it&#8217;s pretty much like the Auto-Rhythm feature keyboards have had for about twenty years (even down to the General Midi sound quality!)</p>
<p>   It&#8217;s not specifically even a &#8220;karaoke thingy&#8221; either.  Karaoke machines don&#8217;t track incoming vocals and attempt to build (admittedly stereotypical) harmony lines around them.</p>
<p>   Gotta take the opposite side here (again) just like with the &#8220;she-happens-to-be-a-scientologist-so-we-boycott-her-show&#8221; idiocy).  If &#8220;songsmith&#8221; would have been produced by any other company but Microsoft, it would either not been deemed newsworthy, or you&#8217;d have thought his was pretty cool from the beginning.</p>
<p>Actually, as much of an open-source/&#8221;Free&#8221; software advocate as I am, I gotta hand it to Microsoft: their stuff at least tends to be user-friendly to some degree, rather than the overtly &#8220;user-hostile&#8221; RTFM nonsense in the Linux scene.  The GUI interface was invented what, 30 years ago or more, and yet they&#8217;re only NOW getting the GUIs to be good in various Linux distros, in favor of intentionally-cryptic, overly terse Command-line usage.  Sorry, but the primary reason Linux hasn&#8217;t penetrated more on desktop usage etc. is because they ignored the &#8220;end-user&#8221; experience.  Microsoft didn&#8217;t, which is one of the few things they&#8217;ve actually done right.</p>
<p>   Okay, time to wander off again, and wait for the flaming to begin.</p>
<p>Ciao, Y&#8217;all!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sukasa</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18379/comment-page-1#comment-957945</link>
		<dc:creator>Sukasa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 18:34:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18379#comment-957945</guid>
		<description>I just about broke out laughing, this was brilliant.  Thanks, Jon :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just about broke out laughing, this was brilliant.  Thanks, Jon <img src='http://www.p2pnet.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


