<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Asia software piracy spiralling</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/1847/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/1847</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:11:09 -0300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/1847/comment-page-1#comment-3184</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2004 08:34:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-3184</guid>
		<description>What exactly constitutes software piracy? Just about everything I use on even a monthly basis is either a free program or paid for. But since I have saved most warez I ever downloaded, probably hundreds of software programs, I might be considered a major offender.

On my computer I have installed quite a few warez programs that I virtually never use - I try them out and then after sitting there dormant for a long time I eventually uninstall them to clean up the start menu. Kind of like cleaning out a cluttered refrigerator, closet or attic every now and then.  

I can understand the significance of a business using expensive technical software illegally, as this gives them an unfair competitive advantage over a competitor that purchases its software. In many businesses in scientific, engineering and technical fields, the cost of software licenses can be a major operating expense. But how do you compare a business that uses unregistered software professionally to a consumer that uses it only very occasionally if at all?

Rather than going after the little guys like college students who write cracks, First World governments should target the corporations within their own borders that outsource jobs to subcontractors in countries which are known to use pirated software. How about some laws making all the Haliburtons pay a hefty fine if even one of their foreign subcontractors is caught using illegal software. The problem is that these corporations know very well that those 3rd world companies - and sometimes their own overseas subsidiaries - that they outsource to are using bootleg software. Yet they consider it someone else&#039;s problem as long as outsourcing saves them money.  The big corporations are, as usual, not held accountable, and can easily get away with it because of who they are. 



</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What exactly constitutes software piracy? Just about everything I use on even a monthly basis is either a free program or paid for. But since I have saved most warez I ever downloaded, probably hundreds of software programs, I might be considered a major offender.</p>
<p>On my computer I have installed quite a few warez programs that I virtually never use &#8211; I try them out and then after sitting there dormant for a long time I eventually uninstall them to clean up the start menu. Kind of like cleaning out a cluttered refrigerator, closet or attic every now and then.  </p>
<p>I can understand the significance of a business using expensive technical software illegally, as this gives them an unfair competitive advantage over a competitor that purchases its software. In many businesses in scientific, engineering and technical fields, the cost of software licenses can be a major operating expense. But how do you compare a business that uses unregistered software professionally to a consumer that uses it only very occasionally if at all?</p>
<p>Rather than going after the little guys like college students who write cracks, First World governments should target the corporations within their own borders that outsource jobs to subcontractors in countries which are known to use pirated software. How about some laws making all the Haliburtons pay a hefty fine if even one of their foreign subcontractors is caught using illegal software. The problem is that these corporations know very well that those 3rd world companies &#8211; and sometimes their own overseas subsidiaries &#8211; that they outsource to are using bootleg software. Yet they consider it someone else&#8217;s problem as long as outsourcing saves them money.  The big corporations are, as usual, not held accountable, and can easily get away with it because of who they are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/1847/comment-page-1#comment-3177</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2004 00:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-3177</guid>
		<description>*You can&#039;t claim losses from sales that never would have happened in the first place.*

Sure you can if you&#039;re part of the entertainment industry - it&#039;s SOP ; )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*You can&#8217;t claim losses from sales that never would have happened in the first place.*</p>
<p>Sure you can if you&#8217;re part of the entertainment industry &#8211; it&#8217;s SOP ; )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/1847/comment-page-1#comment-3173</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2004 23:36:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-3173</guid>
		<description>People in asia can&#039;t afford $1200 for Adobe Photoshop. That&#039;s like an entire year&#039;s earnings for most people.

These BSA stats are fundamentally flawed. A great majority of people who pirate software there can&#039;t afford to buy it legally, even if they wanted to. They simply don&#039;t have the money. You can&#039;t claim losses from sales that never would have happened in the first place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People in asia can&#8217;t afford $1200 for Adobe Photoshop. That&#8217;s like an entire year&#8217;s earnings for most people.</p>
<p>These BSA stats are fundamentally flawed. A great majority of people who pirate software there can&#8217;t afford to buy it legally, even if they wanted to. They simply don&#8217;t have the money. You can&#8217;t claim losses from sales that never would have happened in the first place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/1847/comment-page-1#comment-3171</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2004 22:19:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-3171</guid>
		<description>Hmm, interesting -- when did Puerto Rico gain independence?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, interesting &#8212; when did Puerto Rico gain independence?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/1847/comment-page-1#comment-3170</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2004 21:50:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-3170</guid>
		<description>When I visited Hong Kong and Beijing, there were little street shops and stalls within large buildings that sold high-end software for pennies on the dollar. When the Police neared to arrest the shop owners, they were nowhere to be found: informants told the shop owners about the Police, they immediately shut down their shop, lock its gates, then leave; the Police would arrive and wouldn&#039;t (or couldn&#039;t) do anything about it. Obviously, the Police need to be empowered with the ability to confiscate bootleg software whether the owner is there or not. 

There&#039;s no way to prevent piracy from happening: it&#039;s simply too easy to duplicate programs. Anti-piracy schemes built into software has proven to be more of a hassle than a success, so that&#039;s not a workable solution. However, we can limit some of the piracy by encoding into the applications that they only present themselves in say, English--at least that way, non-English speakers wouldn&#039;t be interested in buying pirated copies since they wouldn&#039;t be able to use or read it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I visited Hong Kong and Beijing, there were little street shops and stalls within large buildings that sold high-end software for pennies on the dollar. When the Police neared to arrest the shop owners, they were nowhere to be found: informants told the shop owners about the Police, they immediately shut down their shop, lock its gates, then leave; the Police would arrive and wouldn&#8217;t (or couldn&#8217;t) do anything about it. Obviously, the Police need to be empowered with the ability to confiscate bootleg software whether the owner is there or not. </p>
<p>There&#8217;s no way to prevent piracy from happening: it&#8217;s simply too easy to duplicate programs. Anti-piracy schemes built into software has proven to be more of a hassle than a success, so that&#8217;s not a workable solution. However, we can limit some of the piracy by encoding into the applications that they only present themselves in say, English&#8211;at least that way, non-English speakers wouldn&#8217;t be interested in buying pirated copies since they wouldn&#8217;t be able to use or read it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


