<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Windows 7 DRM infested?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18510/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18510</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 11:06:52 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: James Pound</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18510/comment-page-1#comment-980815</link>
		<dc:creator>James Pound</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 16:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18510#comment-980815</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a windows fanboy and will be until there is support for games on linux.  I don&#039;t mean FOSS, I mean real market games.  I don&#039;t think that will happen with over 1000 distros of linux.  I consider linux the defacto OS for server or anything serious and the perfect appliance OS.  I know of the hacks to get games to work but they are just that, hacks.  I am running windows XP and will continue to do so long after it is ever supported.  I have 3 copies of the same CD and the service packs so if Microsoft were to go away tomorrow I would still run XP (might have to get an activation crack though). Which brings me to my point.  It seems like Microsoft isn&#039;t happy with an OS that is both stable and doesn&#039;t treat their paying customers like criminals (with DRM activation, etc).  I will not purchase another OS including windows 7 until this is remedied in an acceptable manner.  I am fine with keys or the like, but having to call or activate something over Internet (and with Vista periodically) is maddening.  I spent 289 dollars on XP Professional full install 5 years ago.  I have sent over 60 hours in that on the phone with Microsoft fighting to fix activation related issues (I change hardware a LOT).  If you count the cost in time (lets assume 10 bucks an hour here for me and their reps just for a mental exorcise) that is over 1,200 dollars in wasted time screwing with their activation system and talking to Bob Freds and Joe&#039;s over in India (Yes they give false American names because most Americans can&#039;t deal with names like Gabagunabarachanuka Paraislkalkavar) Micr$oft has the possibility of a good product, but until they start listening to their customers and stop listening to the likes of the MPAA and RIAA I forcast Windows 7, and on will sell at a significantly reduced rate.  (This is not intended to be flame bait, and is all my opinion,)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a windows fanboy and will be until there is support for games on linux.  I don&#8217;t mean FOSS, I mean real market games.  I don&#8217;t think that will happen with over 1000 distros of linux.  I consider linux the defacto OS for server or anything serious and the perfect appliance OS.  I know of the hacks to get games to work but they are just that, hacks.  I am running windows XP and will continue to do so long after it is ever supported.  I have 3 copies of the same CD and the service packs so if Microsoft were to go away tomorrow I would still run XP (might have to get an activation crack though). Which brings me to my point.  It seems like Microsoft isn&#8217;t happy with an OS that is both stable and doesn&#8217;t treat their paying customers like criminals (with DRM activation, etc).  I will not purchase another OS including windows 7 until this is remedied in an acceptable manner.  I am fine with keys or the like, but having to call or activate something over Internet (and with Vista periodically) is maddening.  I spent 289 dollars on XP Professional full install 5 years ago.  I have sent over 60 hours in that on the phone with Microsoft fighting to fix activation related issues (I change hardware a LOT).  If you count the cost in time (lets assume 10 bucks an hour here for me and their reps just for a mental exorcise) that is over 1,200 dollars in wasted time screwing with their activation system and talking to Bob Freds and Joe&#8217;s over in India (Yes they give false American names because most Americans can&#8217;t deal with names like Gabagunabarachanuka Paraislkalkavar) Micr$oft has the possibility of a good product, but until they start listening to their customers and stop listening to the likes of the MPAA and RIAA I forcast Windows 7, and on will sell at a significantly reduced rate.  (This is not intended to be flame bait, and is all my opinion,)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Виталий</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18510/comment-page-1#comment-976361</link>
		<dc:creator>Виталий</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 21:43:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18510#comment-976361</guid>
		<description>Зачет!:) Но есть и минус ! У меня скорость интернета 56 кбит/сек. Пага грузилась около 15 секунд.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Зачет!:) Но есть и минус ! У меня скорость интернета 56 кбит/сек. Пага грузилась около 15 секунд.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DRM Koolaid</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18510/comment-page-1#comment-967725</link>
		<dc:creator>DRM Koolaid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 07:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18510#comment-967725</guid>
		<description>&quot;Many windoze fanboys are swooning over the BETA (yes I purposely capitalised it for emphasis) version., completely oblivious to the fact that it’s vista with a new coat of paint.&quot;

Or a pig with lipstick? lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Many windoze fanboys are swooning over the BETA (yes I purposely capitalised it for emphasis) version., completely oblivious to the fact that it’s vista with a new coat of paint.&#8221;</p>
<p>Or a pig with lipstick? lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trilateral_Commission</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18510/comment-page-1#comment-967720</link>
		<dc:creator>Trilateral_Commission</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 04:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18510#comment-967720</guid>
		<description>Many windoze fanboys are swooning over the BETA (yes I purposely capitalised it for emphasis) version., completely oblivious to the fact that it&#039;s vista with a new coat of paint. I guess ignorance is bliss for some eh? Lets wait for the official release before making a conclusion shall we? And until then i&#039;ll stick with xp for games and ubuntu for real work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many windoze fanboys are swooning over the BETA (yes I purposely capitalised it for emphasis) version., completely oblivious to the fact that it&#8217;s vista with a new coat of paint. I guess ignorance is bliss for some eh? Lets wait for the official release before making a conclusion shall we? And until then i&#8217;ll stick with xp for games and ubuntu for real work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18510/comment-page-1#comment-967717</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 03:35:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18510#comment-967717</guid>
		<description>Yeah, a lot of /.&#039;ers seemed to believe this as well, until someone pointed out
it was just more FUD from one of their members.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, a lot of /.&#8217;ers seemed to believe this as well, until someone pointed out<br />
it was just more FUD from one of their members.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DRM Koolaid</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18510/comment-page-1#comment-967694</link>
		<dc:creator>DRM Koolaid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 22:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18510#comment-967694</guid>
		<description>Hmmm, maybe I missed something then. Whatever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm, maybe I missed something then. Whatever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18510/comment-page-1#comment-967682</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 20:57:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18510#comment-967682</guid>
		<description>Um, Koolaid, I don&#039;t think that is meant to be somerthing you should be thanking Jon for</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um, Koolaid, I don&#8217;t think that is meant to be somerthing you should be thanking Jon for</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DRM Koolaid</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18510/comment-page-1#comment-967657</link>
		<dc:creator>DRM Koolaid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 18:38:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18510#comment-967657</guid>
		<description>Thankyou Jon, much appreciated.

Oh FFS, I can&#039;t get this tin foil hat off. Someone give me a hand here!! :)

But on topic, I seriously can&#039;t believe Microsoft would try this on. The draco DRM was one of the big reasons that Vista was so disliked and they&#039;ve been really burned by it with low sales, so what the hell are they playing at?

Yeah, drink the koolaid...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thankyou Jon, much appreciated.</p>
<p>Oh FFS, I can&#8217;t get this tin foil hat off. Someone give me a hand here!! <img src='http://www.p2pnet.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>But on topic, I seriously can&#8217;t believe Microsoft would try this on. The draco DRM was one of the big reasons that Vista was so disliked and they&#8217;ve been really burned by it with low sales, so what the hell are they playing at?</p>
<p>Yeah, drink the koolaid&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18510/comment-page-1#comment-967642</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 17:08:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18510#comment-967642</guid>
		<description>^^ I had several emails and I also saw the /. post myself. I usually try to credit people when they send in links, but when there&#039;s more than just a couple ...

Cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>^^ I had several emails and I also saw the /. post myself. I usually try to credit people when they send in links, but when there&#8217;s more than just a couple &#8230;</p>
<p>Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DRM Koolaid</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18510/comment-page-1#comment-967640</link>
		<dc:creator>DRM Koolaid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 16:57:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18510#comment-967640</guid>
		<description>Ok Jon. I guess I&#039;ll have to try harder next time. lol :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok Jon. I guess I&#8217;ll have to try harder next time. lol <img src='http://www.p2pnet.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18510/comment-page-1#comment-967639</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 16:44:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18510#comment-967639</guid>
		<description>^^ Actually, DRM, the first mention came in email from Jazz over in the UK yesterday.

Cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>^^ Actually, DRM, the first mention came in email from Jazz over in the UK yesterday.</p>
<p>Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DRM Koolaid</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18510/comment-page-1#comment-967637</link>
		<dc:creator>DRM Koolaid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 16:07:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18510#comment-967637</guid>
		<description>This scoop as first brought to you on p2pnet by yours truly, right here:

www p2pnet net/story/18506#comment-967614

(sorry, have to strip out the dots or Wordpress won&#039;t let the post through.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This scoop as first brought to you on p2pnet by yours truly, right here:</p>
<p>www p2pnet net/story/18506#comment-967614</p>
<p>(sorry, have to strip out the dots or Wordpress won&#8217;t let the post through.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Devil's Advocate</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18510/comment-page-1#comment-967634</link>
		<dc:creator>Devil's Advocate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 15:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18510#comment-967634</guid>
		<description>If it&#039;s caused by W7, we&#039;ll hear more about this as others do their own &quot;dry runs&quot; with W7 and cracked software.  If you think about it, though, the guys at TechForensics would more than likely be using a CS4 they&#039;ve already successfully run on other Windows.  Why would they be trying it with an unproven crack?  That wouldn&#039;t make any sense.

The bottom line is, Windows shouldn&#039;t care about modifying a non-Windows application DLL, unless it&#039;s designed to shutdown (what it perceives to be) an illegitimate copy of that application.  In a case like that, the only part of the software that would be reverse-engineered would be where the registration/activation/etc interacts with the software itself.  If the crack successfully bridges the activation process (and many do this quite well), the software should continue to run.

I&#039;ve seen very few popular cracks that actually &quot;break&quot; the application, as some at CNet are trying to say.  Not that it can&#039;t happen (it sure can), but it would seem to be the least likely possibility of the two.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it&#8217;s caused by W7, we&#8217;ll hear more about this as others do their own &#8220;dry runs&#8221; with W7 and cracked software.  If you think about it, though, the guys at TechForensics would more than likely be using a CS4 they&#8217;ve already successfully run on other Windows.  Why would they be trying it with an unproven crack?  That wouldn&#8217;t make any sense.</p>
<p>The bottom line is, Windows shouldn&#8217;t care about modifying a non-Windows application DLL, unless it&#8217;s designed to shutdown (what it perceives to be) an illegitimate copy of that application.  In a case like that, the only part of the software that would be reverse-engineered would be where the registration/activation/etc interacts with the software itself.  If the crack successfully bridges the activation process (and many do this quite well), the software should continue to run.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve seen very few popular cracks that actually &#8220;break&#8221; the application, as some at CNet are trying to say.  Not that it can&#8217;t happen (it sure can), but it would seem to be the least likely possibility of the two.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sukasa</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18510/comment-page-1#comment-967630</link>
		<dc:creator>Sukasa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 14:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18510#comment-967630</guid>
		<description>&quot;A legitimate copy of Photoshop CS4 stopped functioning after we clobbered a nagging registration screen by replacing a DLL with a hacked version.&quot;
    Yes, because it&#039;s entirely windows&#039; fault that you broke CS4.  Did these guys not consider that perhaps the hacked DLL might have been detected by CS4 or even  been a corrupt DLL anyways?  How would W7 know the difference between a hacked DLL and a legitimate hotfix/update/whatever?

&quot;The inputs of your sound card are severely degraded in software if the card is also playing an audio program (tested here with Grooveshark).&quot;
    I get this in Vista (heck, I can&#039;t even play back the microphone.)  I&#039;m still pretty sure that&#039;s a driver issue, not a windows one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A legitimate copy of Photoshop CS4 stopped functioning after we clobbered a nagging registration screen by replacing a DLL with a hacked version.&#8221;<br />
    Yes, because it&#8217;s entirely windows&#8217; fault that you broke CS4.  Did these guys not consider that perhaps the hacked DLL might have been detected by CS4 or even  been a corrupt DLL anyways?  How would W7 know the difference between a hacked DLL and a legitimate hotfix/update/whatever?</p>
<p>&#8220;The inputs of your sound card are severely degraded in software if the card is also playing an audio program (tested here with Grooveshark).&#8221;<br />
    I get this in Vista (heck, I can&#8217;t even play back the microphone.)  I&#8217;m still pretty sure that&#8217;s a driver issue, not a windows one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
