Digital TV transition major concern for Canada
p2pnet news view TV | Politics:- Starting this week, hundreds of U.S. television stations plan to shut down their analog broadcasts as they complete the transition to digital over-the-air broadcasts. While the U.S. had planned for a nationwide change this month, last-minute legislation delayed the full mandatory transition until mid-June.
The U.S. experience to date highlights what should be a major concern for Canada – the transition from analog to digital broadcasts is years behind that of the United States, with virtually no industry or government support. This sounds like a purely technical issue, yet the policy implications of that transition will have a profound effect on the national broadcast and telecom landscape.
The basic transition is fairly straightforward. For decades, Canadian broadcasters have used spectrum to transmit over-the-air analog broadcast signals.
Before the widespread use of cable and satellite, many Canadians used antennae – “rabbit ears”– to access those broadcast signals. Today, approximately 10 per cent of Canadians still rely on over-the-air television signals.
Early in the next decade, Canadian broadcasters are scheduled to complete the switch from analog to digital broadcasts. The shift to digital brings several advantages including better image and sound quality, as well as more efficient use of spectrum that will open the door to new telecom services.
The shift will require some significant investments, however, since broadcasters must phase out their analog transmitters in favour of new digital equipment.
Regulators first hoped broadcasters would voluntarily make the switch. In response to concerns that North American broadcasters were moving too slowly (several European countries have already transitioned from analog to digital), both the U.S. and Canada established mandatory deadlines by which the change must be completed.
Canada and the U.S. negotiated an agreement on the digital television transition in 2000, but the U.S. is now more than two years ahead of Canada, with its mandatory transition set for June 12, 2009. By contrast, the Canadian deadline is Aug. 31, 2011 (there are some exceptions for northern and remote communities).
Notwithstanding the longer Canadian phase-in, there are mounting concerns that Canadian broadcasters will not be ready in time. Last year, Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission chair Konrad von Finckenstein delivered a stinging rebuke to the broadcasters, noting the paucity of digital transmitters in Canada and lamenting that “so far, the industry has not shown the sense of urgency that I think is called for right now.”
Given the difficult economic climate, Canadian broadcasters are likely to lobby Industry Minister Tony Clement heavily for a deferral of the digital transition.
The shift also has implications for Canadian consumers, who may need new equipment because televisions without a digital tuner will require a special set-top box to view the over-the-air digital signals. This additional cost could affect lower-income Canadians, who are more likely to rely on over-the-air signals than cable or satellite services.
U.S. lawmakers have established a plan to support those in need of the digital equipment with a $1.5 billion (U.S.) coupon program that subsidizes the cost.
At the moment, there are no similar plans in Canada.
The CRTC has made it clear consumer subsidies fall outside its statutory mandate and, last week, Heritage Minister James Moore told a House of Commons committee there were no government plans to establish a consumer program.
The digital transition may result in some challenges for broadcasters but the implications are even greater for telecommunications. An important by-product of the transition will be that much of the spectrum now used by broadcasters for analog broadcasts will be freed up for other uses.
Next week’s column will examine the potential for dramatic new uses of spectrum – including more open networks and unlicensed “white spaces” that could foster new innovation and deliver wireless broadband services.
Michael Geist
[Geist is the Canada Research Chair in Internet and E-commerce Law at the University of Ottawa. He can be reached by email at mgeist[at]uottawa.ca and is on-line at www.michaelgeist.ca.]
February , 2009
Use free p2pnet newsfeeds for your site. It’s really easy!
Subscribe to p2pnet.net | | rss feed: http://p2pnet.net/p2p.rss | | Mobile – http://p2pnet.net/index-wml.php
Net access blocked by government restrictions? Use Psiphon from the Citizen Lab at the University of Toronto. Go here for details.






February 17th, 2009 at 5:51 pm
And of course the digital format will be different that the US format so no one in Canada wil be able to recieve US signals and the US will not be able to get Canadian content. Of course shipping or transporting of the recievers accoss the border will be also forbidden.
I used to watch CBC and CTV off the satellite before they went digital and thought it was nice to get a different point of view from the US news services. Thank God now I no longer have to be confused by hearing the truth.
February 17th, 2009 at 10:00 pm
US Digital signals are recieveable in Canada (I know because I’ve been able to get them), but the set-top boxes are not available in stores. As a result many Canadians (mostly those close to the US border like those in Southern Ontario) will loose their US stations starting today as they shut down. The new LCD and plasma TV sets have the tuners, as do many computer TV tuner cards, but the stand-alone boxes are not yet available. And considering the shortage in the US it could be some time before Canada gets any. Furthermore, many old rabbit ears won’t work as they’re not strong enough to get the digital signals. Good UHF based antennae are needed.
February 17th, 2009 at 11:15 pm
Rest assured that CRTC is going to screw this one up too, as they screwed up with the satellite TV in the nineties.
Also, why Canada is always trailing USA? Lack of leadership? After all, Pierre-Elliott Trudeau was establishing relationships with the new Cuban government of Castro despite US opposition. Would Harper do the same? No! Harper is a political prostitute of USA. The times when Canada had its own policies and politics are long gone.