<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: M&amp;Mâs World Headlines: Feb 18, 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18538/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18538</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:11:09 -0300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: DRM Koolaid</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18538/comment-page-1#comment-967831</link>
		<dc:creator>DRM Koolaid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 16:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18538#comment-967831</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t believe TechDirt is saying that MediaSentry *not* having a PI licence doesn&#039;t matter.

&quot;I know that many folks who are against the RIAA&#039;s sue-&#039;em-all strategy have played up the idea that MediaSentry (the company the RIAA used to sue to collect its flimsy &quot;evidence&quot;) isn&#039;t a &quot;licensed private investigator&quot; in various states that require PI licenses. To be honest, I&#039;ve always found this argument rather silly and distracting from the main point.&quot;

What??

Read the rest: http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090219/0135273829.shtml</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t believe TechDirt is saying that MediaSentry *not* having a PI licence doesn&#8217;t matter.</p>
<p>&#8220;I know that many folks who are against the RIAA&#8217;s sue-&#8217;em-all strategy have played up the idea that MediaSentry (the company the RIAA used to sue to collect its flimsy &#8220;evidence&#8221;) isn&#8217;t a &#8220;licensed private investigator&#8221; in various states that require PI licenses. To be honest, I&#8217;ve always found this argument rather silly and distracting from the main point.&#8221;</p>
<p>What??</p>
<p>Read the rest: <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090219/0135273829.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090219/0135273829.shtml</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


