<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SoundExchange streaming royalties deal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18578/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18578</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:11:09 -0300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18578/comment-page-1#comment-968236</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:54:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18578#comment-968236</guid>
		<description>Says SoundExchange on their web page:
&quot;SoundExchange retains, on a confidential basis, the artist&#039;s address, contact person, designated payee(s) and royalty earnings history and balances.&quot; 

on a confidential basis...royalty earnings history

Just like all performance rights organizations, record companies, publishers, etc.
ll money stuff is confidential. 

That means no audits for the benefit of artists and no comparisons between artist. Very nice for the industry side.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Says SoundExchange on their web page:<br />
&#8220;SoundExchange retains, on a confidential basis, the artist&#8217;s address, contact person, designated payee(s) and royalty earnings history and balances.&#8221; </p>
<p>on a confidential basis&#8230;royalty earnings history</p>
<p>Just like all performance rights organizations, record companies, publishers, etc.<br />
ll money stuff is confidential. </p>
<p>That means no audits for the benefit of artists and no comparisons between artist. Very nice for the industry side.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred Wilhelms</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18578/comment-page-1#comment-968205</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred Wilhelms</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 13:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18578#comment-968205</guid>
		<description>This is not a joke.  

Under Section 114 of the Copyright Act, payment of the statutory Internet performance royalty goes through SoundExchange (as the only authorized collective) and it always has.  If the webcaster and a label make a direct (non-statutory) license deal, the payment goes directly to the label. (More on this in a note to come.) As the settlement with the NAB will be formally made part of the CRB rate structure, it will be treated as a statutory payment, and thereby go to SoundExchange and not the label.

Fred</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is not a joke.  </p>
<p>Under Section 114 of the Copyright Act, payment of the statutory Internet performance royalty goes through SoundExchange (as the only authorized collective) and it always has.  If the webcaster and a label make a direct (non-statutory) license deal, the payment goes directly to the label. (More on this in a note to come.) As the settlement with the NAB will be formally made part of the CRB rate structure, it will be treated as a statutory payment, and thereby go to SoundExchange and not the label.</p>
<p>Fred</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18578/comment-page-1#comment-968197</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 11:18:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18578#comment-968197</guid>
		<description>&quot;This means that the recording artists heard on NAB simulcasts will be entitled to 45% of the royalty revenue.&quot;

This is a joke? Label contracts insure that all money goes to and through the labels. There accounting magic does their tricks and artists get little or nothing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;This means that the recording artists heard on NAB simulcasts will be entitled to 45% of the royalty revenue.&#8221;</p>
<p>This is a joke? Label contracts insure that all money goes to and through the labels. There accounting magic does their tricks and artists get little or nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


