Comments on: The Pirate Bay vs Them: Day Eight

By: david miron

david miron — Mon, 02 Mar 2009 11:19:40 +0000

Avast Ye Landlubbers, check out my CARTOON about the Pirate Bay Trial
http://www.pcdisorder.com/2009/03/pirate-bay-trial-almost-over-before-it.html

By: NO1UNO

NO1UNO — Thu, 26 Feb 2009 02:32:03 +0000

âThe reason for this drop is that the number of premieres have increased but sales have decreased.”
And it cant be because………
Most of the movies are SHIT??
Ticket prices are stupid??
And who in HELL wants to pay $3.50-$5.00 for a soda or a tiny ass bag of candy ????
Look, the real deal is this, if (and i reallly mean IF) i had the money to go to a movie
or buy a CD. I’m smart enough to realize i cant afford to spend $50-$70 US (family of 4)
for a POS movie that i wouldn’t download when it does hit TPB.
And I’m damn sure not putting $10-$20 down on a CD that, if i like the band, MIGHT have 2-3 tracks i like
So, no lost sales here, you wouldn’t get my money anyway!!!
stw

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Wed, 25 Feb 2009 18:58:25 +0000

I thought this was about music and not films. This trail is just a f**king joke, and the problem is these f**kers will win (music industry).

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Wed, 25 Feb 2009 18:09:56 +0000

I don’t believe his BS that file sharing is affecting the premieres because movies are typically not on p2p until the DVD are released save for very few exceptions. So he is full of it.

Why Am I not surprise?

Let’s finish up these parasites now!

Let’s rebuild this industry with better people!

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Wed, 25 Feb 2009 18:08:41 +0000

Despite all the weak arguments and bullshit spouted by big shit media, I can see them winning.

Why?

Because, with relentless pressure, they’ve strongarmed Sweden to into suing TPB for something that wasn’t illegal in their country in the first place.

That relentless pressure included buying all the right politicians and judges to secure that win.

It seems to me that they have to put something together to present as “evidence” in a sham trial – the made up maths is a perfect example. Hence, whe’re seeing them spout lots of garbage and then incredibly, they’ll fucking win!

This is one shining example of blatant corruption.

Fuck I hope I’m wrong.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Wed, 25 Feb 2009 17:40:01 +0000

“Kennedy said that younger people have the money but just donât spend it on music anymore.”

This is true too. Now they buy pest killer to defend themselves against the 7 corporation of parasites.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Wed, 25 Feb 2009 17:35:45 +0000

âWhen put to him that some claim that illegal downloading promotes sales, Kennedy labeled this as old-fashioned thinking and said that people donât think this way anymore,â

This is true. If you are a member of the RIAA, MPAA IFPI meaning basicaly one of the 7 major corporations of parasites you are under boycott until you die.

File sharing have nothing to do with this by the way. Even if they were not file sharing you will be still boycotted.

SORRY!

By: Robert

Robert — Wed, 25 Feb 2009 16:12:49 +0000

Unfortunately, maybe Ray Beckerman can prove/disprove, I don’t think it really matters if you use distorted or magical math. If you can win the judge/jury over with whatever you say, crying on the stand about how you can’t afford a gold plated Porche for your wife, and how artists are starving, you’ve had to lay off tens of thousands of people etc.. you’ll win the trial.

I don’t think common sense applies in court as much as we would like it to. Some precedents I’ve read about (such as the Facebook one on Michael Geist’s blog) make me question the decisions made in courtrooms and whether they were really for the good of the people at large, or just a clever attempt to win a case at any and all costs.

By: Devil's Advocate

Devil's Advocate — Wed, 25 Feb 2009 13:31:32 +0000

“If there were 1 million downloaders in total, itâs probable that 4% downloaded Mastermind,â enigman has Sandgren, saying: âOf those, 28,5% were downloaded from TPB. That gives 12000.”

In a real court of law, the use of “assumptive mathematics” should automatically disqualify any point made by using it.

These Big Media arguments fail to “entertain” me anymore.
Nothing but complete shit getting slung around!