Australia censorship plans ’scuttled’
p2pnet news view Politics | Freedom:- PLEASE, PLEASE let there be another planet out there where commonsense, honesty, decency and respect are the norm, and where corporations have been stripped of their ‘person’ status.
And PLEASE tell us how to find it!
Because things are really looking grim on Planet Earth where every day, more government-sanctioned corporate outrages occur.
It’s a constant fight between the We, the People, and Them, the corrupt companies and their bought-and-paid-for politicians, who try to keep us in the dark, like mushrooms, feeding us bullshit.
It’s tiring but, thanks to the Net and the fact People 2 People communications have taken over from the corporate media which used to be outsole sources of data and information, we’re making progress.
In one of the latest wins, the Australian government’s efforts to censor the Net have effectively been scuttled, says the Sydney Morning Herald.
And according to the story, it’s largely down to independent senator Nick Xenophon who joined the Greens and Opposition to block legislation required to get the scheme started.
“The Opposition’s communications spokesman Nick Minchin has this week obtained independent legal advice saying that if the Government is to pursue a mandatory filtering regime ‘legislation of some sort will almost certainly be required’,” says the story, going on »»»
Senator Nick Xenophon (right) previously indicated he may support a filter that blocks online gambling websites but in a phone interview today he withdrew all support, saying “the more evidence that’s come out, the more questions there are on this”.
The Communications Minister, Stephen Conroy, has consistently ignored advice from a host of technical experts saying the filters would slow the internet, block legitimate sites, be easily bypassed and fall short of capturing all of the nasty content available online.
Despite this, he is pushing ahead with trials of the scheme using six ISPs – Primus, Tech 2U, Webshield, OMNIconnect, Netforce and Highway 1.
But even the trials have been heavily discredited, with experts saying the lack of involvement from the three largest ISPs, Telstra, Optus and iiNet, means the trials will not provide much useful data on the effects of internet filtering in the real-world.
Senator Conroy originally pitched the filters as a way to block child porn but – as ISPs, technical experts and many web users feared – the targets have been broadened significantly since then.
A secret blacklist contains 1370 sites, “only 674 of which relate to depictions of children under 18,” says the SMH, adding:
“This week Senator Conroy said there was ‘a very strong case for blocking’ other legal content that has been ‘refused classification’. According to the classification code, this includes sites depicting drug use, crime, sex, cruelty, violence or ‘revolting and abhorrent phenomena’ that ‘offend against the standards of morality’.
The Austraklian government, “has said it was considering expanding the blacklist to 10,000 sites and beyond,” adds the story.
censor the Net – Australia Net censorship plan comes unglued,December 10, 2008
Use free p2pnet newsfeeds for your site. It`s really easy!
Subscribe to p2pnet.net | | rss feed: http://p2pnet.net/p2p.rss | | Mobile – http://p2pnet.net/index-wml.php
Net access blocked by government restrictions? Use Psiphon from the Citizen Lab at the University of Toronto. Go here for details.




Senator Nick Xenophon (right) previously indicated he may support a filter that blocks online gambling websites but in a phone interview today he withdrew all support, saying “the more evidence that’s come out, the more questions there are on this”.
February 26th, 2009 at 3:09 pm
don’t worry they will be back with a better plan to screw them. What technically is going on is the test showed the “software and hardware ” had issues and that they need to fix and refine, all this means is that in a year or two that will totally be fixed and a true wall will be in place hardwired for sites you are ONLY allowed to visit as opposed to blocking you form ones they have in a list.
YEA the internet becomes then useless and then millions will just turn it off and downgrade to useless dial up, YUP effective at control of culture and free speech very good you nazi bunch a bastards, well ill be there to make noise. We aren’t going away.
And the great thing here is that as the eocnomy of the USA tanks that means fewer and fewer dollars for hollywood which lessons there ability to effect change of obama about the world and glad to say that i hope it lasts a few years and totally smacks them down.
February 26th, 2009 at 8:35 pm
@dum isp
Do you know what a DNS Server is? or http://opendns.com?
They cant filter the net when your own Customers even refuse to use your DNS Server
Thank you so much Senator Xenophon
February 26th, 2009 at 8:43 pm
Senator Xenophon may be the only Pollie in Australia to know what Freedom of Speech means to Aussies
God Bless
Junk Filter > DNS > Encryption Comeoncomcasts Rule of Three XD
I hope other Aussie Pollies embrace todays technology and dont try to filter or limit it
February 28th, 2009 at 8:58 pm
Australia = China.
February 28th, 2009 at 9:56 pm
the whole filter system isnt here to stop child porn it never was , how many kids lets say 10 years olf go to porn sites to find older men? none really but how many kids go to neo pets or poke a mon sites? tons and thats where the perverts will be
the filter is about control i know all too well what it was made for and to stop stexaul monsters itsnt its prime goal
sadly it will be back in another form in a few years im sure
March 1st, 2009 at 4:07 am
I guess it would be immoral of me to say that you’r wrong. Opps you can add this site to the blocklist now. hehehe
March 1st, 2009 at 8:00 pm
I hate censorship as much as anyone else, but I also respect the intellectual rights of producers of works. In the case of this article, the image used was pulled off wikipedia, sourced from flickr, and the image is released under cc-by-sa-2.0 rights which require attribution of the author and the license to be displayed. Poor form p2pnet.net
March 4th, 2009 at 11:59 am
@ Wikipedia editor ^^
Your post was flagged by Akismet as spam. I have no idea why, but I came across it accidentally and cleared it.
Hereâs what the Wikipedia says of the pic http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Nick_Xenophon.jpg (from which I clipped a portion):
Nick Xenophon
Source http://www.flickr.com/photos/liamjon-d/2894741048/
Date 28 Sep 2008
Author http://www.flickr.com/photos/liamjon-d/
Permission (Reusing this image)
Creative Commons license – Creative Commons Attribution Creative Commons Share Alike This file is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 2.0 License
Iâll be more careful in future.
Cheers!