Comments on: ‘Sensitive’ Obama helicopter data online http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18657 p2pnet.net - reader powered Mon, 23 Nov 2009 10:00:11 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: www.eZee.se http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18657/comment-page-1#comment-968860 www.eZee.se Wed, 04 Mar 2009 14:28:27 +0000 http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18657#comment-968860 And here's another example as to why these file sharing programs should be banned, if you guys dont agree to that... then you HAVE to consider shutting down the internets, its the only logical solution I tell you. /Cary Sherman P.S Dan Glickman agrees with me as well. And here’s another example as to why these file sharing programs should be banned, if you guys dont agree to that… then you HAVE to consider shutting down the internets, its the only logical solution I tell you.

/Cary Sherman

P.S Dan Glickman agrees with me as well.

]]> By: Henry Emrich http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18657/comment-page-1#comment-968764 Henry Emrich Mon, 02 Mar 2009 23:05:36 +0000 http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18657#comment-968764 Now, THIS is interesting: 1. Here we have another company jumping on the latest moral panic -- p2p technology. This seriously implies to me that these people are probably weasels of some kind. They "monitor" p2p networks? I thought surveillance and Big-Brotherism was Government's job? (Oh wait, I forgot -- Bush "outsourced" the beat-and-kill-unarmed-civilians thing to Blackwater International. Ain't the "free market" fun, tho?) :) 2. Pardon me for being skeptical/unimpressed about the "sensitive" helicopter data in Tehran. I realize this was supposed to dissapear into the "memory hole", but Osama Bin Laden, Saddam Hussein, and a significant portion of the "madmen in dirty nightshirts" (as conservative talk-show jackass Michael Savage put it) were "our boys" back when "we" considered them useful against the Soviet Union. So I'm not particularly surprised that "sensitive" data showed up. Maybe one of their CIA handlers accidentally left his Blackberry or something. :) 3 Anybody heard anything about "Clouseau" recently? Now, THIS is interesting:

1. Here we have another company jumping on the latest moral panic — p2p technology. This seriously implies to me that these people are probably weasels of some kind. They “monitor” p2p networks? I thought surveillance and Big-Brotherism was Government’s job? (Oh wait, I forgot — Bush “outsourced” the beat-and-kill-unarmed-civilians thing to Blackwater International. Ain’t the “free market” fun, tho?) :)

2. Pardon me for being skeptical/unimpressed about the “sensitive” helicopter data in Tehran. I realize this was supposed to dissapear into the “memory hole”, but Osama Bin Laden, Saddam Hussein, and a significant portion of the “madmen in dirty nightshirts” (as conservative talk-show jackass Michael Savage put it) were “our boys” back when “we” considered them useful against the Soviet Union.
So I’m not particularly surprised that “sensitive” data showed up. Maybe one of their CIA handlers accidentally left his Blackberry or something. :)

3 Anybody heard anything about “Clouseau” recently?

]]>