‘I over-reacted’ re Judge Davis: Ray Beckerman
p2pnet news view | RIAA News:- “One of my young readers, ‘Michael’, who is a law student, posted a comment yesterday suggesting that the order Judge Davis issued was actually a standard form,” says Ray Beckerman on Recording Industry vs The People.
He’s referring to his statement, yesterday, that judge Michael Davis, presiding over the latest Jammie Thomas trial, “really does get it!”
He continued »»»
If there were any doubt left in anybody`s mind as to whether District Judge Michael J. Davis, the extraordinary judge who presided over the ill fated October, 2007, first trial in Capitol Records v. Thomas, finally gets it about whom he is dealing with, and the toxic effect the RIAA, Matthew Oppenheim, and their legal team have had, and that doubt has not yet been removed by:
-his sua sponte calling a penalty on himself, and noting that the RIAA lawyers had failed to call to his attention controlling contrary 8th Circuit authority;
-his setting aside of the verdict due to that RIAA-created error;
-his noting in his decision setting aside the verdict that the outlandish size of the verdict was absurd, and calling upon Congress to prevent any similar recurrences; and
-his scheduling a two-day settlement conference for March 30th and 31st .
all doubt should now be removed, by an order which he signed on February 25th, and which was filed by the Clerk today, laying out the parameters of the March 30th-March 31st settlement conference:
But, “I reacted vituperatively to Michael, saying that based on my 35 years of litigation experience, it was not a standard form,”Beckerman now says, continuing »»»
As it turns out Michael was right, and I was wrong; it is a standard form commonly used in Minnesota’s federal court for settlement conferences.
None of my 35 years of litigation experience have been in Minnesota.
I apologize to Michael and all of my other readers, and I thank Michael and those other readers, here and on Slashdot, who corrected me.
Moral of that story: don’t hesitate to question ‘authority even when the ‘authority’ has 35 years of experience on you.
Meanwhile, Beckerman adds, “as to the substance of the order, standard form or not, the record companies will have to produce ‘officers’ or ‘managing agents’ with decision making ‘power’.
“That still means Mr. [Matthew] Oppenheim cannot call the shots on this one.”
Which is what it was all about in the first place.
Jon Newton - p2pnet
March, 2009
Use free p2pnet newsfeeds for your site. It`s really easy!
Subscribe to p2pnet.net | | rss feed: http://p2pnet.net/p2p.rss | | Mobile – http://p2pnet.net/index-wml.php
Net access blocked by government restrictions? Use Psiphon from the Citizen Lab at the University of Toronto. Go here for details.





March 4th, 2009 at 1:42 am
Hey Ray. Everyone makes mistakes. Not everyone owes up to them. Props to you on that one. It’s one thing to make it and another all together to admit to it and apologise for it. You, dear sir, are a big man with a big heart.
March 4th, 2009 at 11:55 am
Classic example of the good guys (Ray B) and the scum (RIAA).
Ray B makes a mistake he owns up to it and apologizes.
RIAA make a mistake, don’t consider owning up to it, they instead choose to continue suing innocent people and ruining lives.
Sometimes the lines between good and evil get a bit blurry or are extremely near… this certainly is _not_ one of those times.
Cheers!
Ryan
March 4th, 2009 at 12:52 pm
Ray is an Hero!
March 4th, 2009 at 12:53 pm
Thank you for doing this Ray and protecting our country!
March 4th, 2009 at 6:19 pm
Wow an Attorney with ethics you are a rear breed Ray Kudos to you my man