<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should everyone with a canceled A/C sue Google?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18714/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18714</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:11:09 -0300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Devil's Advocate</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18714/comment-page-1#comment-969104</link>
		<dc:creator>Devil's Advocate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 17:17:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18714#comment-969104</guid>
		<description>&quot;Iâd recommend that people didnât sell their audienceâs eyeballs...&quot;
(It&#039;s comforting to know I&#039;m not the only one who thinks this way.)

I think Jon&#039;s done a pretty good job of keeping the ads at a sensible level.
And, this is one of the few sites left, I&#039;ve noticed, that doesn&#039;t try to insert a pop-under as soon as the URL begins to resolve, or at any other time while connected.

Keeping stuff like that out is something I really appreciate, however, the down side, of course, is that it limits the amount of possible revenue for the site operator.  If anything (and I can&#039;t believe I&#039;m about to say this...), Jon could probably do with a little more ad content (and the revenue)!

I&#039;ve been so focused on the content and dialogue, I often don&#039;t even take note of the presence of the ads.
(Probably due to the fact that less advertising facilitates this focus.)

Talk about a Catch 22!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Iâd recommend that people didnât sell their audienceâs eyeballs&#8230;&#8221;<br />
(It&#8217;s comforting to know I&#8217;m not the only one who thinks this way.)</p>
<p>I think Jon&#8217;s done a pretty good job of keeping the ads at a sensible level.<br />
And, this is one of the few sites left, I&#8217;ve noticed, that doesn&#8217;t try to insert a pop-under as soon as the URL begins to resolve, or at any other time while connected.</p>
<p>Keeping stuff like that out is something I really appreciate, however, the down side, of course, is that it limits the amount of possible revenue for the site operator.  If anything (and I can&#8217;t believe I&#8217;m about to say this&#8230;), Jon could probably do with a little more ad content (and the revenue)!</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been so focused on the content and dialogue, I often don&#8217;t even take note of the presence of the ads.<br />
(Probably due to the fact that less advertising facilitates this focus.)</p>
<p>Talk about a Catch 22!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crosbie Fitch</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18714/comment-page-1#comment-969086</link>
		<dc:creator>Crosbie Fitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 15:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18714#comment-969086</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d recommend that people didn&#039;t sell their audience&#039;s eyeballs to advertisers in the first place.

Sell your audience what they want to buy from you. Don&#039;t cannibalise a chunk of what value they do perceive in your work at disproportionate expense by devaluing it with advertising. The monetary return you make is a small fraction of the loss in value to your audience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d recommend that people didn&#8217;t sell their audience&#8217;s eyeballs to advertisers in the first place.</p>
<p>Sell your audience what they want to buy from you. Don&#8217;t cannibalise a chunk of what value they do perceive in your work at disproportionate expense by devaluing it with advertising. The monetary return you make is a small fraction of the loss in value to your audience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


