Comments on: Judge Gertner says no Oppenheim deposition

By: Trilateral_Commission

Trilateral_Commission — Tue, 10 Mar 2009 19:21:48 +0000

âThe Court will not hesitate to impose appropriate sanctions, including potentially substantial costs, should the Defendant waste either the Plaintiffsâ time and money or scarce judicial resources by filing frivolous motions in the future.â

Sounds like the RIAA’s whole campaign, but it doesn’t get sanctioned does it? This judge evidently has no idea what she is doing.

By: A_F

A_F — Tue, 10 Mar 2009 14:27:50 +0000

Dodgy,

the “scarce judicial recources” are not the ones of Evil4.
It’s the resources of the judiciary she talks about!

If it were the Plaintiffs she had intended to mean at that late point in the sentence, she had not used an “and” between time and money but a “,”.

By using “and” it is clear that the enumeration of the plaintiffs things, that are allegedly wasted, is finished with the atribute behind that “and”.

You know, only evil4 themself deliberately try to be unclear with what they claim/allege by deliberately using the “and/or” in their sentences or switching now after the illegal investigators from SafeNet aka. Media Sentry are reportedly dropped to “identified” instead of “detected” in their claims.

By: Devil's Advocate

Devil's Advocate — Tue, 10 Mar 2009 14:05:38 +0000

Just to be the Devil’s Advocate [which I certainly am ): )> ], the judge simply said “…or scarce judicial resources” in a string of things starting with “Plaintiffs’ time and money”.

Perhaps she was referring to the *Defendant’s* resources (which are inarguably more limited).
She has already shown in the past she’s not impressed with the imbalance of resources in favour of the MAFIAA.

By: Dodgy

Dodgy — Tue, 10 Mar 2009 11:55:39 +0000

“should the Defendant waste either the Plaintiffsâ time and money or scarce judicial resources by filing frivolous motions in the future.â

The plaintiffs SCARCE judicial resources.. is that judge on Crack?