Comments on: New Zealand 3-strikes anti-P2P bill killed http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18759 p2pnet.net - reader powered Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:11:09 -0300 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Reader's Write http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18759/comment-page-1#comment-969492 Reader's Write Wed, 11 Mar 2009 19:24:57 +0000 http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18759#comment-969492 The French saga doesn't mention the most important thing LOWER YOUR FU**ING PRICES. You might even get somewhere. The French saga doesn’t mention the most important thing LOWER YOUR FU**ING PRICES. You might even get somewhere.

]]> By: Reader's Write http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18759/comment-page-1#comment-969491 Reader's Write Wed, 11 Mar 2009 19:22:39 +0000 http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18759#comment-969491 The real motivation of "copyright" (why the concept was thought up) has always been to restrict dissemination of information. Only those who could pay were entitled to know. But the only ones with money was those already so entrenched in, and so "converted" (perverted) to the cause of the "Establishment" that whatever they "learned" from the art was discounted to infinity by their prior beliefs, commitments etc. So, bottom line, whatever an artist produced was never really "released", merely "recycled". That is pretty good actually and probably is what these pro-copyright pundits aspire to while patting themselves on the shoulder for being "Ever so clever". But, as we have come to learn in this universe, there would be a snag somewhere. A consequence of this incessant "recycling" may be that, in other spheres, to compensate and so restore balance to the whole; massive and irreversible "consumption" has erupted. Some example of this may be the death-wish-eat-till-you-burst-syndrome otherwise known as the perpetual acme of the couch-potato, reportedly just now so prevalent. Thank you mister Copyright, just keep it right up now ! The real motivation of “copyright” (why the concept was thought up) has always been to restrict dissemination of information. Only those who could pay were entitled to know. But the only ones with money was those already so entrenched in, and so “converted” (perverted) to the cause of the “Establishment” that whatever they “learned” from the art was discounted to infinity by their prior beliefs, commitments etc.

So, bottom line, whatever an artist produced was never really “released”, merely “recycled”. That is pretty good actually and probably is what these pro-copyright pundits aspire to while patting themselves on the shoulder for being “Ever so clever”.

But, as we have come to learn in this universe, there would be a snag somewhere.

A consequence of this incessant “recycling” may be that, in other spheres, to compensate and so restore balance to the whole; massive and irreversible “consumption” has erupted. Some example of this may be the death-wish-eat-till-you-burst-syndrome otherwise known as the perpetual acme of the couch-potato, reportedly just now so prevalent.

Thank you mister Copyright, just keep it right up now !

]]>