<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Street-level imaging: ONLY BY PERMISSION</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18834/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18834</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:11:09 -0300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: RadialSkid</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18834/comment-page-1#comment-971475</link>
		<dc:creator>RadialSkid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 16:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/?p=18834#comment-971475</guid>
		<description>Why the hell is everyone so worried about Street View? No one gives a damn about you or your house. 

Street view is only utlized in major cities. Why should those of us who use Street View be denied it just because some self-centered individuals actually labor under the misapprehension that they have privacy at all when they live in cities? When you live in a highly populated area, privacy in your yard is the first thing you give up. 

Now when Google comes up with &quot;Living Room View,&quot; then I&#039;ll get behind the people who don&#039;t want it. Until then: They&#039;re in public, they can photograph whatever they want, and they can post it on whatever website they want. Get over it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why the hell is everyone so worried about Street View? No one gives a damn about you or your house. </p>
<p>Street view is only utlized in major cities. Why should those of us who use Street View be denied it just because some self-centered individuals actually labor under the misapprehension that they have privacy at all when they live in cities? When you live in a highly populated area, privacy in your yard is the first thing you give up. </p>
<p>Now when Google comes up with &#8220;Living Room View,&#8221; then I&#8217;ll get behind the people who don&#8217;t want it. Until then: They&#8217;re in public, they can photograph whatever they want, and they can post it on whatever website they want. Get over it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18834/comment-page-1#comment-971468</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 15:51:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/?p=18834#comment-971468</guid>
		<description>So basically, they want to impose so many restrictions and conditions on things like Google Streetview that it will no longer be practical to do...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So basically, they want to impose so many restrictions and conditions on things like Google Streetview that it will no longer be practical to do&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/18834/comment-page-1#comment-971343</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 23:32:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/?p=18834#comment-971343</guid>
		<description>i saw the google car today here in winnipeg, only knew it was them by their peri-threehund-deg-cam-omnidirectionalalitorian-era-o-scope on the roof of the car

basically sure it goes against canadian privacy law, but the nerd in me just had to oooo and ahhhh when i saw it :P  even if it was on a bland ford focus</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i saw the google car today here in winnipeg, only knew it was them by their peri-threehund-deg-cam-omnidirectionalalitorian-era-o-scope on the roof of the car</p>
<p>basically sure it goes against canadian privacy law, but the nerd in me just had to oooo and ahhhh when i saw it <img src='http://www.p2pnet.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' />   even if it was on a bland ford focus</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


