Welcome to P2PNET.net - The original daily p2p and digital news site. Always First!
Register | Login
RIAA News
Cool Stuff
MPAA News
Games / Consoles
News
Music
Movies
TV
Open Source
Mobiles
Advertising
Product News
P2P
Off Topic
Freedom
Politics
Interviews
Security
DRM
Links
Kids and Kartels
Search: 
Search
 
Web P2PNET   
Search: 
Search
Torrent Site Tracker
TekSavvy
 
Add real-time p2pnet headlines to YOUR site ! Click here to download our newsfeed code

Is mp3 where it was?

p2pnet.net News:- Is mp3 where it was? And if so, where’s it going?

Britain’s Bill Thompson has a few ideas on the subject.

“I’ve been getting increasingly irritated with the format wars between Microsoft and Apple and the way both of them have rolled over and let the music industry force them down the path towards DRM and limited downloads,” he told p2pnet.

“Unfortunately far too many people have what can only be described as a
romantic attachment to a ten year old codec. I wrote this piece to bring them out of the woodwork – and it certainly worked.

“And before the rest of you start, I know that MP3 can be made to work – it’s just so much hassle that I can’t see it’s worth it.”

Now read on >>>>>>>>>

Time to ditch mp3
By Bill Thompson - andfinally.com

I was sitting on the train the other day indulging in a bit of unconscious iPod flaunting – constantly readjusting the little white buds in my ear, checking track names as an excuse to remove the shiny white toy from my pocket, that sort of thing – when I noticed that the person opposite me had a different sort of digital music player.

There was no way to tell what he was listening to, but even if it had been something very cool, I could not have suggested that we swap some tracks and share our libraries, as none of the digital music players made to date will let you.

The record companies would not like it, as they would say it was piracy to share the odd track with a friend.

The hardware manufacturers themselves probably would not support it either, as it would mean working together and agreeing standards in what is an intensely competitive market.

And even if we could have copied the files, my train companion was probably a Windows user and listening to music stored using Media Player’s WMA format, so I would not have been able to play his stuff anyway.

Apple, which makes the iPod, has decided that it would be bad for business to make their customer’s lives easier by letting them listen to WMA files and wants us to stick with their chosen format, called AAC, instead.

We might, after all, decide not to buy music from their online music store, or another hardware manufacturer might come up with a nicer, cheaper or better player than theirs.

There is a convenient myth that markets are about giving people what they want. But at the early stages of any new technology, when the desire is not there because nobody really knows what is being offered, they are much more about grabbing customers and locking out the competition.

And at this stage in the development of portable music players, when most people are not that interested in them or cannot afford them, it is about trying to be in the best position when the mass market breakthrough happens.

There is no reason to defend MP3, no reason why everyone who currently listens to MP3s stored on their hard drive should not move to something significantly better

That means not giving the early adopters what they want, like players that can play any format and are easy to upgrade.

One format that almost every player can cope with, of course, is good old MP3.

Originally developed in 1988 and adopted as a standard by the Motion Picture Experts Group (Mpeg), ISO-Mpeg Audio Layer-3 (to give it its full name) was chosen by a number of programmers looking for ways to take large music files off CDs and rip them for storage on their computers.

The resulting files were small enough to be traded over the net, and MP3 was the format used by Napster and other file-sharing and peer-to-peer networks in the late 1990’s.

It is still the one format that almost anything will play, a fact that has given it a lease of life it really does not deserve.

There are many things wrong with MP3 and only one thing right.

The right thing is that it does not come with any form of digital rights management.

Sound advice

Once you have got an MP3 of a song you can copy it, share it, burn it to disc, play it on as many portable devices as you want and, crucially, write or download software to convert it into any other format you fancy.

The wrong things are that it is old and no longer up to the job. In order to keep file sizes down MP3 encoding loses a lot of data, a lot more than modern formats, and this shows in the quality of the listening experience.

The way it compresses files and plays them back means that the music too often sounds awful on anything but tinny laptop speakers or cheap earphones.

We cannot let some sort of techno-nostalgia get in the way here.

There is no reason to defend MP3, no reason why everyone who currently listens to MP3s stored on their hard drive should not move to something significantly better.

And there is no reason why older MP3 players should not be upgraded to play newer and better formats, including the open source Ogg Vorbis.

New formats do not have to come with rights management, so the key benefit of MP3s for music fans remains.

Our ears deserve a better format than MP3

I have already copied all of my old CDs to my iTunes music library where they are stored as AAC files, but I can copy them, play them and burn them to CD without restriction.

It is only music I buy from an online music store, a temptation I have so far resisted, that is limited.

I could do the same if I was using Microsoft’s WMA.

My friend Tony, obsessed with the highest fidelity “lossless encoding” of his music, has a multi-gigabyte setup for his digital music and uses WMA. He simply converts his files to the format needed for his portable players when required, even using MP3 if he has to.

Part of the problem is that MP3 has become shorthand for digital music in the press, especially in the non-technical press where talk of formats and standards and encoding rapidly confuses the journalists, never mind their readers.

A catchy technical-sounding abbreviation, one that was burned into public consciousness as Napster rose and fell, is a lot easier to write than “digitally encoded music and any associated codecs”.

Although we might be stuck with the term for some time to come, I hope we will not actually be using this old, unsuitable and rather inadequate file format for much longer.

In the early days of Napster I remember hearing a parody of Dire Straits’ Money for Nothing, which included the refrain “I want my MP3″.

Now it should at least be “I want my AAC”, without any DRM, of course. Our ears deserve better than a format from the last millennium.

========================

Published here under a Creative Commons License.

HOME

5 Responses to “Is mp3 where it was?”

  1. Reader's Write Says:

    well, yes, aac is far a far superior compression format than mp3, but seriously though, i think mp3s are here to stay for a good while yet. The term has become a generic for all digital compressed music.

    It’s like the old Betamax vs VHS story – The Sony Betamax video system was technically superior, but VHS had the best marketing and so won out in the end.

    The mp3s situation is similar because although technically mp3s are old-hat, they are probably the most well-known and most widely available form of digitally compressed music.

    and anyway, one day we’ll have the bandwidths and storage that will make compression unecessary :)

  2. Reader's Write Says:

    previous post by analog_alkali

    i thought i had signed in, sorry.

  3. Reader's Write Says:

    analog_alkali = iain elder

    damn i’m tired

  4. Reader's Write Says:

    what about ogg vorbis? though i haven’t had much as much exposure as i would need to pass judgement, it seems like a great format . . . the great sound and low file sizes of AAC without the DRM and proprietary format issues. companies like i-river are embracing this format, though more mainstream software encoders need to jump on the train to really get it moving. open source seems like the best way to go. this guy’s right, though, the format war needs to conclude sometime soon, before too many people invest in soon-to-be obsolete hardware.

    also, the public needs to become more educated on the subject before buying an ipod just because its “cute.” true, with some people this type of purchase is unstoppable, but only with masses of informed purchases will we be able to demand the features and file types that we deserve.

  5. Reader's Write Says:

    Bill Thompson writes a good rant and I agree with some of his positions. But Bill, .mp3 is here to stay because all the other formats have their own drawbacks and it would take a revolution to get the world to change horses this late in the day.

    Frankly, any adult over the age of 30 has lost the ability to hear music content much above 10Khz and that includes harmonics. I challenge anyone to listen, back-to-back (on a top line system), to an original CD track and the same track (without knowing which is which), ripped to 128kbps (by a quality utility such as MusicMatch) and to then be able to state, categorically and with sound technical reasoning, which is the original and which is the .mp3.

    I have run this test on friends and family, including my son when he was 10, using high quality source material from Sheffield Labs (Creme de la Creme, Drum Sessions, Burn-in CD) and no one has ever been able to tell me which version they were listening to.

    You know what they say – “If it works, don’t fix it”. MP3 works.

    rzyss@rogers.com

Leave a Reply

Please no Spam, flaming (attacking others), trolling, and posting off-topic. Thanks.

    Advertisements
MP3Rocket


Remove Spyware with AntiSpyware for Windows®