<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: US newspapers &#8211; tax-exempt?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/19167/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/19167</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:11:09 -0300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lola</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/19167/comment-page-1#comment-973630</link>
		<dc:creator>Lola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 14:14:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/?p=19167#comment-973630</guid>
		<description>We have an existing process for filing for non-profit status. If newspapers had chosen to qualify themselves for this status, they could have applied. Why give them a special status and ease that other non-profits do not enjoy? If I started a charity, the government would not streamline the process for me or re-write the rules.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have an existing process for filing for non-profit status. If newspapers had chosen to qualify themselves for this status, they could have applied. Why give them a special status and ease that other non-profits do not enjoy? If I started a charity, the government would not streamline the process for me or re-write the rules.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Devil's Advocate</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/19167/comment-page-1#comment-970348</link>
		<dc:creator>Devil's Advocate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 15:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/?p=19167#comment-970348</guid>
		<description>&quot;...action is needed to help preserve local newspapers.â 

Or, we could just accept the business model is dead, and move on.
_________________

&quot;Whatâs next? Bar them from disclosing information not pleasant to the government?&quot;

In other words, what&#039;s already going on to a large extent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;action is needed to help preserve local newspapers.â </p>
<p>Or, we could just accept the business model is dead, and move on.<br />
_________________</p>
<p>&#8220;Whatâs next? Bar them from disclosing information not pleasant to the government?&#8221;</p>
<p>In other words, what&#8217;s already going on to a large extent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/19167/comment-page-1#comment-970326</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 13:28:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/?p=19167#comment-970326</guid>
		<description>&quot;Newspapers would be barred from making political endorsements&quot;

What&#039;s next? Bar them from disclosing information not pleasant to the government?

This law is a threat to press neutrality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Newspapers would be barred from making political endorsements&#8221;</p>
<p>What&#8217;s next? Bar them from disclosing information not pleasant to the government?</p>
<p>This law is a threat to press neutrality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flagg1209</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/19167/comment-page-1#comment-970322</link>
		<dc:creator>flagg1209</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 12:51:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/?p=19167#comment-970322</guid>
		<description>Sounds like a good idea, in principle. It removes the current political &#039;editorialising&#039; that happens constantly in local news (and national), and allows the medium to remain as a viable source of local news for those who are not currently a part of the modern, internet-driven, news revolution. It also would help safeguard some jobs, in a time when they are sorely needed (in the short-term, at least).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like a good idea, in principle. It removes the current political &#8216;editorialising&#8217; that happens constantly in local news (and national), and allows the medium to remain as a viable source of local news for those who are not currently a part of the modern, internet-driven, news revolution. It also would help safeguard some jobs, in a time when they are sorely needed (in the short-term, at least).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


