Comments on: Unheard Michael Jackson tracks online

By: B.K.O

B.K.O — Sun, 16 May 2010 18:30:07 +0000

He was found innocent and jordan chandler has already said sorry as his father forced him to lie about what happened (it’s true, search it in google). Those of you who who are being IDIOTS most have some serious issues with your lives. And would you talk about any other dead person this way? No, you wouldn’t. I dont care if you “hate” him, hes dead, so respect. And R, who gives a damn if they are not his kids, he still loved them with all his heart and gave them al a good home. Is that not what’s important anymore.

By: John Ho

John Ho — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 18:08:18 +0000

@Henry

Oh come on, are you blind? You call him talentless and Marjorie had proven you wrong. You say him guilty and the court has proven him not guilty. Are you one of the people that claimed he molested you?

By: L.C

L.C — Tue, 07 Apr 2009 08:55:09 +0000

wtf! henry why the hell are we gonna admit somthing thats not true and has not been proved to be true? you has a massive vedate against this!. the facts state he never do ANYTHING to them boys!, and the facts state THEY lied!. before blab on about mj make sure u read the facts and not what u read in the papers or what u watch on south park, i mean what a joke!. michael jackson was found not guilty of all charges? but yet u still think hes guilty? whys that? if u can give me any facts on why he is guilty go ahead. yano the reason y dis man gets slated so much? becuz he doesnt defend himself publicy enough. he just lets people make rumors and talk trash about him.

By: R

Sun, 05 Apr 2009 03:36:58 +0000

Mj should not lie about those kids we all know they are not his real kids.

By: Henry Emrich

Henry Emrich — Fri, 03 Apr 2009 01:14:12 +0000

Marjorie:

Also, which “plaintiffs” are you referring to in your sad little pro-Michael screed?
Which of the *TWO INCIDENTS YEARS APART* are you referencing, hmm?

Further, if he was “completely innocent”, then why the multi-million dollar settlement, hmm?
Pardon me, but there’s something fatally flawed about how that went down:
During the first incident, he goes on TV and gives this long, weepy-voiced propaganda piece about how the big, evil cops made him show his genitals etc. But then he elected instead to BUY THEM OFF?

Quoting the Wikipedia article:

“On January 25, Jackson settled a civil suit out of court. He agreed to pay a total of $22 million to Jordan, Chandler, June Chandler (the mother) and prosecution attorney Larry Feldman.”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1993_child_sexual_abuse_accusations_against_Michael_Jackson#Out_of_court_settlement

The bastard’s every bit as guilty as O.J., but nobody wants to admit this, especially among his fanbase:
And Y’know what’s the saddest part of all of this?
It’s not ABOUT the skin-lightening, nose jobs, or any of the other bullshit: it’s about a guy who bought his way out of a previous accusation in 1993, and deliberately fouled attempts to investigate the latest one.

He’s a talentless pederast, and shouldn’t be defended.

By: Devil's Advocate

Devil's Advocate — Thu, 02 Apr 2009 21:52:43 +0000

@Marjorie:

Jackson *WAS ONCE* a talented and revered artist.
That was before his brain started self-destructing.

I always suspected something more happened to him during that fateful Pepsi ad mishap, beside simply burning his hair. Not long after it happened, that’s when all the stuff about a skin pigmentation disorder and a number of other “anomolies” began. With that kind of sudden misfortune, it’s quite common to find out there was brain damage or some deeply manifested psychological trauma coming into play.

Michael certainly fits the MO. He really did change before our eyes!
Geez! He was BLACK up until the accident, and not living in a self-created amusement park, or surrounded 24/7 by impressionable children, or sleeping in a “hyperbaric chamber”, or getting multiple plastic surgeries (trying desperately to look like a white version of Latoya).

If an ordinary citizen began acting even remotely like that, it would “off to the Nuthouse!”

By: Devil's Advocate

Devil's Advocate — Thu, 02 Apr 2009 21:36:22 +0000

@Henry:

I actually didn’t mean to give the impression I was mocking you.
(Sorry if that’s the way it looked.)

I totally agree with you, particularly the part about the MAFIAA-protected degenerates getting away with truly serious crimes we could never hope to.

And, that episode of South Park had me totally in stitches!

By: Marjorie

Marjorie — Thu, 02 Apr 2009 01:06:14 +0000

NOW YOU REALLY ARE SOME APRIL FOOLS’S

By: Marjorie

Marjorie — Thu, 02 Apr 2009 01:05:50 +0000

Wow !! Muchael Jackson was found to be totally innocent !! The people who stated that about him, only wanted his money. Plus, the PLANTIFF’S
also scammed the government and JC penny’s out of hundreds of thousands of dollars. So you need to stop letting your little brains be swayed
by the media. Perhaps you are jealous and your souls are very eager to believe anything bad about him, because you can never be like him.
Talentless, is that a joke? Is that why ever young star of today are fascinated with him, copy his music, copy his dance moves, and want desperately to meet him. You are obviously living on another planet. Oh yeah, if he is so talentless that his tour was sold out in hours, not in days like other artists. Sold out after having had no tour since 1998, no album since 2005. His last album was considered bad becasuse he only sold 12 million, with no publicity, when other artists sell 9 million they are considered superstars. C’mon people get a clue use your brains for more than fillers.
MICHAEL JACKSON IS EXTREMELY TALENTED AND A WONDERFUL PERSON, AND DESERVES TO BE TREATED WITH MUCH RESPECT AND NOT TO
MENTION PURE LOVE.

By: Henry EMrich

Henry EMrich — Thu, 02 Apr 2009 00:25:45 +0000

DA:
“Issues?” Nah. I just hate pedophiles and pretentious hasbeens from the Entertainment cartels.
Combine the two, and you get Michael Jackson.
He highlights — yet again — what’s wrong with the MAFIAA-sanctioned notion of “celebrity”: if a regular person would have done what he’s done in regard to the pedo thing, the way he treated the women he bribed into having his kids, or anything else — if a regular person had done any of that, he’d either be in the mental hospital, prison, or dead by now.

He should just join the rest of them on the Island of Misfit pop-culture cliches and be done with it.

Did anybody here see that Southpark episode about him? “The Jeffersons?” Funny funny stuff — and they totally nailed it.
(Plus, Southparkstudios.com at least allows free streaming, which is at elast a step in the right direction.)

By: Devil's Advocate

Devil's Advocate — Wed, 01 Apr 2009 20:40:19 +0000

@Henry:
Someone’s got “issues”!
: )

@Jon:
Second that pic!
(I wonder how many different “parts” he has to keep now in his “spares” cabinet now!?!)

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Wed, 01 Apr 2009 14:15:08 +0000

lol at pic

By: NO1UNO

NO1UNO — Wed, 01 Apr 2009 14:13:07 +0000

You got it right, Henry!!
And i have to add, who really cares about……….
A. his money problems?
B. his music anymore????
Maybe the other Peds, but nobody i know!

By: Henry EMrich

Henry EMrich — Wed, 01 Apr 2009 13:55:54 +0000

“The new tracks would be worth more than” etc.

What about the unearned boost that talentless pedophile gets from the Beatles catalog?
His “financial troubles” stem from his tendency to touch little boys in an inappropriate fashion.

And I just have to ask: how many times do you need to hear him go “Whoo-hoo”, grab on his junk, and spin? I honestly think that this pederastic scumbag shouldn’t be allowed to retain copyright on ANYTHING (much less things he didn’t even actually DO, like the Beatles catalog.)
Charles Manson never made a dime off of his albums because the law states that revenue from it should go to a victims fund — why is it that Mr. Pedo-With-A-Glove gets the privilege of gouging us all for stuff he didn’t even make?

“King of Pop?” — more like “King of Bad touch!”