Comments on: iMesh, RIAA deal http://www.p2pnet.net/story/1959 p2pnet.net - reader powered Sun, 08 Nov 2009 14:27:55 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Reader's Write http://www.p2pnet.net/story/1959/comment-page-1#comment-3536 Reader's Write Thu, 22 Jul 2004 09:57:47 +0000 #comment-3536 "you will be able to find and share the content you want without fear of being sued." They mean "you will be billed $19.95 a month in user fees or conversely will be bill $2.99 per song and you wont be sued if you use our new program exclusively ... " *rolls eyes* Considering "the plan" so far, which has been to try and deny ANY distribution of copywrited music how can the RIAA do an about face with iMush and yet scoff at kazaa's offer? Conversely how to distinguish between those on iMush who will "allowed" to file share vs those on kluzaa who are being hunted like dogs (I know there is a way - i just find it extremely hypocritical that one part of the fasttrack network will be deemed "ok" and the other half "not") Or does this mean a new network altogether? or just another "iTunes" location ... “you will be able to find and share the content you want without fear of being sued.”

They mean “you will be billed $19.95 a month in user fees or conversely will be bill $2.99 per song and you wont be sued if you use our new program exclusively … ” *rolls eyes*

Considering “the plan” so far, which has been to try and deny ANY distribution of copywrited music how can the RIAA do an about face with iMush and yet scoff at kazaa’s offer?

Conversely how to distinguish between those on iMush who will “allowed” to file share vs those on kluzaa who are being hunted like dogs (I know there is a way – i just find it extremely hypocritical that one part of the fasttrack network will be deemed “ok” and the other half “not”) Or does this mean a new network altogether? or just another “iTunes” location …

]]>