Comments on: p2pnet offered $43,850,000

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Fri, 23 Jul 2004 06:05:53 +0000

I meant to write $25 billion.

Drake

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Fri, 23 Jul 2004 05:18:09 +0000

Sure, if you give me a cut of the $43,850,000.

Drake

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Thu, 22 Jul 2004 15:35:48 +0000

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Thu, 22 Jul 2004 04:20:38 +0000

The point of looking at the headers is usually to see the
“Received: from [...]” lines.
These are missing.
It’s the only info you *might* rely onto since it’s supplied
by the servers relying the message.
Maybe removing only the information specific to p2pnet
would allow readers to see from where this spam originated.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Thu, 22 Jul 2004 04:01:09 +0000

I knew someone who got one of those letters – as a snail mail – over a decade ago, and back then they only offered a measly $2 million or so. It was quite a rare thing then – but now with the ease of cost-free email, it’s now spawned plenty of competition – and apparently a bidding war. I’m just waiting for the $1 billion mark to be broken. It can’t be too far off.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Thu, 22 Jul 2004 03:16:46 +0000

OK Drake. Good thinking. Will you please be our business manager? heh

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Thu, 22 Jul 2004 03:15:33 +0000

They’re not – I took out the —@p2pnet plugs (for obvious reasons ; )

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Thu, 22 Jul 2004 02:46:38 +0000

These don’t seem to be the full headers.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Thu, 22 Jul 2004 02:18:55 +0000

I got one of these emails a few weeks ago, but I was offered $25 million. I say you hold out for more.

Drake

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Thu, 22 Jul 2004 00:18:04 +0000

take it ! take it ! hehehehehe