Comments on: Did Obama make QEII a copyright criminal?

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Mon, 06 Apr 2009 18:05:51 +0000

We english want rid of her as well. But sadly our masters (the government) still wants them, so we are all doomed ha ha ha.

By: Gr8oldies

Gr8oldies — Sun, 05 Apr 2009 14:37:12 +0000

Quote: Frankly, the solution is a meeting by Hillary Clinton and her English counterpart to solve this diplomacy problem before a new RIAA-American created copyright war erupts

I really hope that was a tongue in cheek remark.Hillary Clinton won’t do anything about copyright law remember it was her husband Bill that gave us the DMCA.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Sun, 05 Apr 2009 12:14:59 +0000

This is just one of the confusing aspects of copyright laws and there are hundreds.
Evidently it was written by jerks who knew not what they were doing.

I always wondered what is to be done with the backup copies of videos I have when I die. Must they be given to the same person that inherits the videos? Is it copyright infringement on my part if I put in the will that the backup copies are to be given to charity? Can a dead person commit copyright infringement?

And what of the I tune files? Can I will them without Apple’s permission? Imagine….
Dear Apple: What can do with my I tune licenses after I die?

And can can the Queen will her I pod to a friend? Imagine this….
Dear Apple: I am the Queen of England. Can I will Obamas’s I pod tunes to a niece? Do I need a new license and if so, how much does it cost? Or should I talk to the Chinese ambassador? After all the I pods are probably made in China. BTW I am still wondering why the American president is handing out non American products as gift. Don’t you Americans make anything any longer?

Frankly, the solution is a meeting by Hillary Clinton and her English counterpart to solve this diplomacy problem before a new RIAA-American created copyright war erupts.

By: hackers/pirates of the world unite

hackers/pirates of the world unite — Sun, 05 Apr 2009 00:14:05 +0000

why is there a queen in england then?
let them get rid a her first to see how it works out LOL

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Sat, 04 Apr 2009 19:20:20 +0000

“the Queen enjoys sovereign immunity under UK law because she is, well, the sovereign.”

She is a sovereign, so, she can continue abusing everyone else.

Her representatives in Canada like Adrienne Clarkson and Lise Thibault wasted public money. Lise Thibault is under a criminal investigation now. I wonder how this ends.

Time to get rid of the Monarchy in Canada for good.

Monarchy has no place in 21st century Canada.

By: hackers/pirates of the world unite

hackers/pirates of the world unite — Sat, 04 Apr 2009 18:55:04 +0000

well
id say if the queen can have 40 free tunes we all should GO GET RIGHT NOW.
tell em in court the queen got 40 free tunes…..

By: Hippie

Hippie — Sat, 04 Apr 2009 17:55:27 +0000

” haha, oh wow. if this isnât proof the riaa are doing something wrong, i donât know what is. ”

Not really, but it does show that while all men are created equal, some are more
equal than others.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Sat, 04 Apr 2009 17:21:52 +0000

haha, oh wow. if this isn’t proof the riaa are doing something wrong, i don’t know what is.

By: Qix

Qix — Sat, 04 Apr 2009 16:38:41 +0000

Great article. I asked myself the same thing when i heard about this. This kind of BS has been enraging me for years now.