IFPI shock-horror piracy report
p2pnet.net News Feature:- “Music disc piracy in 2003 grew at its slowest rate in four years, indicating that enforcement efforts by industry anti-piracy teams, and by some government enforcement agencies, are now having a significant impact,” says Big Music’s IFPI (International Federation of Phonographic Industries).
“There were record levels of seizures of discs and a huge increase in seizures of CD copying equipment.” it states.
![]() |
||||
|
The IFPI hectors 10 national governments. But it doesn’t say if it plans to start legal and enforcement actions against Sony Corp or other makers of high volume and ‘consumer’ burners and associated technologies and media which make “music disc piracy” possible. As half of the new Sony BMG company, Sony is one of the Big Four labels which fund the IFPI and provide it with its instructions. “Seizures of industrial-scale CD-making equipment soared in the year, ” says the IFPI. But small-time crooks can do very well with one or more cheap store-bought burners. |
||||
|
Music piracy remains a $4.5 billion illegal business “driven by organised crime, government apathy and corruption,” says the IFPI. In a report which includes ten “priority” countries “named for government action,” the organization says global sales of illegal music discs rose 4% in 2003 and the global average piracy rate increased to a record 35%. “The ratio of illegal to legal CDs sold continues to increase: in 2000, one in five CDs sold worldwide was a pirate copy; in 2003 the ratio was one in three, and rising,” it states. Through IFPI chairman and ceo Jay Berman, the Big Four record labels tell governments – especially Brazil, China, Mexico, Pakistan, Paraguay, Russia, Spain, Taiwan, Thailand and Ukraine – to “act decisively against the problem”. This means “proper enforcement, deterrent sentences against pirates, effective regulation of disc manufacturing and, above all, the political will to make sure real change happens.” The ten countries are, “in IFPI’s view,” failing to “protect and enforce intellectual property rights and tackle unacceptable levels of piracy”. China has the largest pirate market (worth just under US$600 million) and Russia, home to a US$330 million pirate market and a massive international exporter of pirate CDs to some 30 countries, says the IFPI, going on to highlight raids in which national police forces acted for the Big Four labels. Pakistan has entered the list of top 10 for the first time and, “Mexico and Brazil also feature prominently as countries that were until recently among the world’s top 10 largest legitimate music markets but whose music industry, artists and workforce have been decimated by CD-R piracy,” says the IFPI, specifying “actions involving teams of investigators from IFPI and its affiliates, including:
|
||||
![]() |
||||
|
And, “A huge seizure in Peru involving 1,000 police officers netted no fewer than 1 million burned CD-R discs in the famous ‘Hueco’ flea market. During the operation over 400 stands were raided and 10 people were arrested.” There’s no mention of the tremendous disruption these IFPI raids must have caused legitimate businesses, or of similar reports of IFPI / National police “actions” in China, Russia or Pakistan. Nor did the IFPI report give details of how many people were killed and/or injured during these Big Music inspired raids, including the one in Mexico in which police levelled loaded (presumably) rifles. World Black Markets Yet the now famous Oberholzer-Gee and Strumpf paper found file sharing has no measurable effect on music sales. “Downloads have an effect on sales which is statistically indistinguishable from zero, despite rather precise estimates,” says The Effect of File Sharing on Record Sales – An Empirical Analysis. “Moreover, these estimates are of moderate economic significance and are inconsistent with claims that file sharing is the primary reason for the recent decline in music sales.” The same no doubt applies to movies. Instead of trying to kill p2p, the industry could be using it to market and distribute movies, music and software online at very little cost. This would dramatically cut down on the amount of physical product available to ‘pirates,’ slash overhead and bring alienated consumers back into the fold. It wouldn’t eliminate counterfeits, but it would significantly reduce their proliferation. It’s long gone time that the entertainment industy stopped using the IFPI and other pseudo-cop units to bludgeon ‘consumers’ into buying ‘product’. File sharing is here to stay, but it can be Hollywood’s friend instead of its enemy. |
||||







July 23rd, 2004 at 3:34 am
Hey there, don’t get it twisted: filesharing and piracy are NOT the same, lest we fall into the RIAA’s propoganda trap.
The difference with the operations busted in this story is that they were SELLING bootlegged music. That is, they were making monetary gain from the use of someone else’s intellectual property. That’s unfair and perfectly punishable in my eyes.
Now don’t get me wrong, I love and support P2P for the sharing of ALL types of files. The difference with that environment is that when I share the latest hot song with my P2P client, I don’t make any money from it. It doesn’t matter whether I upload to 1 person or 6000, I don’t see a cent. You received free, give free.
These fake disc sellers are the REAL pirates the RIAA needs to look to for lost sales, not P2P users. I’m generally not sympathetic to the music industry’s bleating, but I’m not sorry to see these guys go.
There’s only one question I have to ask the IFPI: these Third World countries have a lot bigger problems than bootleg CDs, including rampant poverty. How the hell do you expect them to put antipiracy initiatives on the front burner consistently for an extended period of time?