Comments on: Canada Privacy Commission DPI site http://www.p2pnet.net/story/19819 p2pnet.net - reader powered Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:11:09 -0300 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Devil's Advocate http://www.p2pnet.net/story/19819/comment-page-1#comment-971074 Devil's Advocate Mon, 06 Apr 2009 18:05:24 +0000 http://www.p2pnet.net/?p=19819#comment-971074 "If Bell Canada wants to do it to their own users, so be it." The trouble with DPI is that it looks at EVERY packet passing through the network that's using it, including forwarded and relayed traffic. “If Bell Canada wants to do it to their own users, so be it.”

The trouble with DPI is that it looks at EVERY packet passing through the network that’s using it, including forwarded and relayed traffic.

]]> By: Reader's Write http://www.p2pnet.net/story/19819/comment-page-1#comment-971065 Reader's Write Mon, 06 Apr 2009 16:25:09 +0000 http://www.p2pnet.net/?p=19819#comment-971065 I think the Privacy Commissioner should wage all out war on this practice. If Bell Canada wants to do it to their own users, so be it. Tthen there should be full disclosure to their users. The Privacy Commissioner should make them take it off of all wholesale ISP's who want it off (and I mean physically gone). The wholesale ISP's packets are not Bell's business. They are playing cop & gatekeeper. Does that office have the balls to do it though? I think the Privacy Commissioner should wage all out war on this practice.

If Bell Canada wants to do it to their own users, so be it. Tthen there should be full disclosure to their users.

The Privacy Commissioner should make them take it off of all wholesale ISP’s who want it off (and I mean physically gone). The wholesale ISP’s packets are not Bell’s business. They are playing cop & gatekeeper.

Does that office have the balls to do it though?

]]>