yeah, only too bad that the MAFIAA has helpers like “Mc-Affe” that successfully prevent that the (I alleged the same) gullible massses who still support them by buying corporate CD’s can read your posts when they gullibly use McAffes “site advisor” while listening to corporate “music” and not knowing how evil “copyrightowners” are.

Why else would “Rightsowners” not want that a case that seems IMO shut and dry like the Tenenbaum one -where he “more or less” admitted in his depo to the acts they accuse him- get the publicity of having the proceedings publicised in the broadest way possible?

The gullible masses -that have no idea beside the propaganda pieces that organised press had released in the last 5 years for organised content since news outlets like yours are blocked from their view- would see how rediculous the demands from MAFIAA (in the end only for the benefit for their executives and the politico bribes and not for the creative guys the artists, lyricists, composers) are.

There is already the little error circulating that it was Joel that refused a 500 dollar offer, while it actually was the other way round that it was greedy corporate Musiclawyers that refused THAT money, wanted 10 times that ammount, and after terrorising Joel long enough so he was finaly ripe to offer those 5k at last, they had smelled blood and wanted nearly double that amount!

Now imagine those gullible masses getting the word that a few songs -that even they probably have “unlicensed” on some of their listening devices- mean all this terror by organized content against ordinary people like they them self, and not only those hardcore piracy guys that do this shit with boats and eyepatches and this stuff or those that do infringing by selling the shit they have no right to sell and what it is that the term “piracy” in legal jargon was once used for.

Cheers!