A Brief History of Record Industry Suicide
p2pnet news view Freedom | P2P:- Brittany Kruger is among the completely innocent people Vivendi Universal, EMI, Warner Music and Sony Music’s RIAA accuses of being a massive online distributor of copyrighted corporate music.
She’s no such thing and it’s ridiculous to suggest she is. But such is the state of the world that, with America far out in front, hardcore commercial interests hold sway above all others.
But Brittany is lucky. Rather than caving in to the Big 4 label and their extortion unit, her father, Randy, is doing everything he possibly can to help his daughter, including continually researching file sharing, and anything and everything to do with it, which led him to When Pigs Fly: The Death of Oink, the Birth of Dissent, and a Brief History of Record Industry Suicide.
OiNK was a UK P2P site targeted by the Big 4 and in 2007 p2pnet quoted the author of When Pigs Fly as saying:
“There seem to be a lot of reasons why the record companies blew it. One is that they’re really not very smart. They know how to do one thing, which is sell records in a traditional retail environment. From personal experience I can tell you that the big labels are beyond clueless in the digital world – their ideas are out-dated, their methods make no sense, and every decision is hampered by miles and miles of legal tape, copyright restrictions, and corporate interests.”
He also wrote »»»
For the major labels, it’s over. It’s fucking over. You’re going to burn to the fucking ground, and we’re all going to dance around the fire. And it’s your own fault. Surely, somewhere deep inside, you had to know this day was coming, right? Your very industry is founded on an unfair business model of owning art you didn’t create in exchange for the services you provide. It’s rigged so that you win every time – even if the artist does well, you do ten times better. It was able to exist because you controlled the distribution, but now that’s back in the hands of the people, and you let the ball drop when you could have evolved.
None of this is to say that there’s no way for artists to make money anymore, or even that it’s the end of record labels. It’s just the end of record labels as we know them.
A lot of people point to the Radiohead model as the future, but Radiohead is only dipping its toe into the future to test the waters. What at first seemed like a rainbow-colored revolution has now been openly revealed as a marketing gimmick: Radiohead was “experimenting,” releasing a low-quality MP3 version of an album only to punish the fans who paid for it by later releasing a full-quality CD version with extra tracks. According to Radiohead’s manager: “If we didn’t believe that when people hear the music they will want to buy the CD then we wouldn’t do what we are doing.” Ouch. Radiohead was moving in the right direction, but if they really want to start a revolution, they need to place the “pay-what-you-want” digital album on the same content and quality level as the “pay-what-we-want” physical album.
Ultimately, I don’t know what the future model is going to be – I think all the current pieces of the puzzle will still be there, but they need to be re-ordered, and the rules need to be changed. Maybe record labels of the future exist to help front recording costs and promote artists, but they don’t own the music. Maybe music is free, and musicians make their money from touring and merchandise, and if they need a label, the label takes a percentage of their tour and merch profits. Maybe all-digital record companies give bands all the tools they need to sell their music directly to their fans, taking a small percentage for their services. In any case, the artists own their own music.
I used to reject the wishy-washy “music should be free!” mantra of online music thieves. I knew too much about the intricacies and economics of it, of the rock-and-a-hard-place situation many artists were in with their labels. I thought there were plenty of new ways to sell music that would be fair to all parties involved. But I no longer believe that, because the squabbling, backwards, greedy, ownership-obsessed major labels will never let it happen, and that’s more clear to me now than ever. So maybe music has to be free. Maybe taking the money out of music is the only way to get money back into it. Maybe it’s time to abandon the notion of the rock star – of music as a route to fame and fortune. The best music was always made by people who weren’t in it for the money, anyway. Maybe smart, talented musicians will find ways to make a good living with or without CD sales. Maybe the record industry execs who made their fortunes off of unfair contracts and distribution monopolies should just walk away, confident that they milked a limited opportunity for all it was worth, and that it’s time to find fortune somewhere else. Maybe in the hands of consumers, the music marketplace will expand in new and lucrative ways no one can even dream of yet. We won’t know until music is free, and eventually it’s going to be. Technological innovation destroys old industries, but it creates new ones. You can’t fight it forever.
Until the walls finally come down, we’re in what will inevitably be looked back on as a very awkward, chaotic period in music history – fans are being arrested for sharing the music they love, and many artists are left helpless, unable to experiment with new business models because they’re locked into record contracts with backwards-thinking labels.
So what can you and I do to help usher in the brave new world? The beauty of Oink was how fans willingly and hyper-efficiently took on distribution roles that traditionally have cost labels millions of dollars. Music lovers have shown that they’re much more willing to put time and effort into music than they are money. It’s time to show artists that there’s no limit to what an energized online fanbase can accomplish, and all they’ll ever ask for in return is more music. And it’s time to show the labels that they missed a huge opportunity by not embracing these opportunities when they had the chance.
1. Stop buying music from major labels. Period. The only way to force change is to hit the labels where it hurts – their profits. The major labels are like Terry Schiavo right now – they’re on life support, drooling in a coma, while white-haired guys in suits try and change the laws to keep them alive. But any rational person can see that it’s too late, and it’s time to pull out the feeding tube. In this case, the feeding tube is your money. Find out which labels are members/supporters of the RIAA and similar copyright enforcement groups, and don’t support them in any way. The RIAA Radar is a great tool to help you with this. Don’t buy CDs, don’t buy iTunes downloads, don’t buy from Amazon, etc. Steal the music you want that’s on the major labels. It’s easy, and despite the RIAA’s scare tactics, it can be done safely – especially if more and more people are doing it. Send letters to those labels, and to the RIAA, explaining very calmly and professionally that you will no longer be supporting their business, because of their bullish scare tactics towards music fans, and their inability to present a forward-thinking digital distribution solution. Tell them you believe their business model is outdated and the days of companies owning artists’ music are over. Make it very clear that you will continue to support the artists directly in other ways, and make it VERY clear that your decision has come about as a direct result of the record company’s actions and inactions regarding digital music.
2. Support artists directly. If a band you like is stuck on a major label, there are tons of ways you can support them without actually buying their CD. Tell everyone you know about them – start a fansite if you’re really passionate. Go to their shows when they’re in town, and buy t-shirts and other merchandise. Here’s a little secret: Anything a band sells that does not have music on it is outside the reach of the record label, and monetarily supports the artist more than buying a CD ever would. T-shirts, posters, hats, keychains, stickers, etc. Send the band a letter telling them that you’re no longer going to be purchasing their music, but you will be listening to it, and you will be spreading the word and supporting them in other ways. Tell them you’ve made this decision because you’re trying to force change within the industry, and you no longer support record labels with RIAA affiliations who own the music of their artists.
If you like bands who are releasing music on open, non-RIAA indie labels, buy their albums! You’ll support the band you like, and you’ll support hard-working, passionate people at small, forward-thinking music labels. If you like bands who are completely independent and are releasing music on their own, support them as much as possible! Pay for their music, buy their merchandise, tell all your friends about them and help promote them online – prove that a network of passionate fans is the best promotion a band can ask for.
3. Get the message out. Get this message out to as many people as you can – spread the word on your blog or your MySpace, and more importantly, tell your friends at work, or your family members, people who might not be as tuned into the internet as you are. Teach them how to use torrents, show them where to go to get music for free. Show them how to support artists while starving the labels, and who they should and shouldn’t be supporting.
4. Get political. The fast-track to ending all this nonsense is changing intellectual property laws. The RIAA lobbies politicians to manipulate copyright laws for their own interests, so voters need to lobby politicians for the peoples’ interests. Contact your local representatives and senators. Tell them politely and articulately that you believe copyright laws no longer reflect the interests of the people, and you will not vote for them if they support the interests of the RIAA. Encourage them to draft legislation that helps change the outdated laws and disproportionate penalties the RIAA champions. Contact information for state representatives can be found here, and contact information for senators can be found here. You can email them, but calling on the phone or writing them actual letters is always more effective.
Tonight, with Oink gone, I find myself wondering where I’ll go now to discover new music. All the other options – particularly the legal ones – seem depressing by comparison. I wonder how long it will be before everyone can legally experience the type of music nirvana Oink users became accustomed to? I’m not too worried – something even better will rise out of Oink’s ashes, and the RIAA will respond with more lawsuits, and the cycle will repeat itself over and over until the industry has finally bled itself to death. And then everything will be able to change, and it will be in the hands of musicians and fans and a new generation of entrepreneurs to decide how the new record business is going to work. Whether you agree with it or not, it’s fact. It’s inevitable – because the determination of fans to share music is much, much stronger than the determination of corporations to stop it.
Stay tuned.
Jon Newton – p2pnet
Use free p2pnet newsfeeds for your site. It`s really easy! Subscribe to p2pnet.net | | rss feed: http://p2pnet.net/p2p.rss | | Mobile – http://p2pnet.net/index-wml.php
Net access blocked by government restrictions? Use Psiphon from the Citizen Lab at the University of Toronto. Go here for details.






April 21st, 2009 at 8:34 am
While it is a great idea to support artists directly, it is a greater idea not to support some of the “artists” who decide to help the cartels sue their fans.
April 21st, 2009 at 9:21 am
Jon, tip for you
http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r22263897-Nomination-for-excellence-in-science-and-tech-reporting
post by Rocky, Teksavvy CEO:
Hey Gang,
I was reading through an email I got about the 24th Annual CATAAlliance Innovation Awards. CAIP is basically a sub of CATA.
In any case, a name jumped up at me that I thought we should all recognise and get to know… “Peter Nowak”!
Peter, who works for CBC, followed much of the activities relating to the Throttling, Net Neutrality and the Parliamentary outing… He even went as far as hopping on one of the buses to live the experience while reporting about the Net Neutrality and throttling issues.
Bottom line, Peter has gone through great lengths to help educate the public and make them aware of current Canadian Internet Affairs…. He deserves a big thumbs up, so I hope everyone takes a moment to get him this award…. He’s earned it!
For those who don’t know him, Peter is the one writing (right in back of TSI-Rick with the sign) in this photo at the Ottawa rally…
April 21st, 2009 at 9:35 am
The people who deserve the recognition are the people who put it all together and the bloggers and dslposters and all the others who kept it alive and made it a national issue.
Just my opinion
April 21st, 2009 at 9:38 am
This is way off topic, but anyway, my vote would be for Ottawa Gal, even if she is anonymous.
Cheers!
April 21st, 2009 at 12:33 pm
“Maybe taking the money out of music is the only way to get money back into it.”
That’s what I have started saying, too. I’m tired and bored with all the projects which are supposed to monetize music. The ideas are always a few years too late.
I think we should tell everyone that you can’t make any money in music. That should clear out anyone who hopes to make a living at this. Then we can see which people are still making music (and of course there will be many of them). If we end all expectations of making money in music, then maybe something will develop organically. Maybe musicians will be endlessly touring gypsies who are housed and fed by fans. Maybe musicians will all have day jobs and music will be something they do with family and friends on the weekend. Maybe a patronage system will develop. Music itself won’t stop, but people may end up doing it simply because they want to, not because of fame or fortune.
April 21st, 2009 at 12:40 pm
“…my vote would be for Ottawa Gal, even if she is anonymous.”
I would second that vote, whether she’s anonymous or not!
(That really was a curious “disclaimer” you attached to it.)
8 0
April 21st, 2009 at 12:44 pm
@ DA:
You mean that she’s anonymous? Because of that, it’d be a bit hard to give her an award
Cheers!
April 21st, 2009 at 3:37 pm
Yeah, but ya can still VOTE for her!
: )
(Don’t worry, I get it. Just funnin’!)
April 22nd, 2009 at 12:09 am
Jon,
You know the guy who wrote that is the art director for Nine Inch Nails, right?
His name is Rob Sheridan.
April 22nd, 2009 at 12:23 pm
Yeh – but I couldn’t remember his name. Thanks.
Cheers!