Welcome to P2PNET.net - The original daily p2p and digital news site. Always First!
Register | Login
RIAA News
Cool Stuff
MPAA News
Games / Consoles
News
Music
Movies
TV
Open Source
Mobiles
Advertising
Product News
P2P
Off Topic
Freedom
Politics
Interviews
Security
DRM
Links
Kids and Kartels
Search: 
Search
 
Web P2PNET   
Search: 
Search
Torrent Site Tracker
MP3rocket
 
Add real-time p2pnet headlines to YOUR site ! Click here to download our newsfeed code
p2pnet - rss feed: http://p2pnet.net/p2p.rss | p2pnet celebrities: http://p2pnet.net/celeb.rss | Mobile? http://p2pnet.net/index-wml.php

MPAA sued over screener ban

Fourteen small movie houses are suing the MPAA (Motion Picture Association of America) in a bid to to try to halt outgoing MPAA boss Jack Valenti’s ban on sending ’screener’ video copies to awards groups.

It will "chill the financing of independent films" by limiting the awards they can receive, say the plaintiffs, who include Talking Wall Pictures, Sandcastle 5 Productions and Salty Features.

They want at least $25 million in damages and a finding that the MPAA was conspiring to monopolize the film industry, restricting trade through unlawful and unreasonable agreements with its governing members, says Larry Neumeister’s Associated Press report here.

Acting for the major studios, MPAA President Jack Valenti imposed a ban because "screener" DVDs were re-appearing for download on file sharing networks. However, following protests from independent studios including, ’specialized’ indy film units such as Vivendi Universal’s Focus Features and Sony Corp’s Sony Pictures Classics, under an agreement with the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences, movie studios would be allowed to send numbered, encoded videocassettes to about Oscar voters, "but not to the far larger pool that votes on lesser honors," says the story.

The latter group includes Golden Globes, Screen Actors Guild awards, critics prizes and other movie honours.

Rich Taylor, an MPAA spokesman, said the lawsuit is misguided because the reason for the ban was "to reduce piracy and to preserve the motion picture industry for filmmakers, both large and small."

But, "If the ban is not lifted immediately, critical exposure, momentum and buzz opportunities will be irreparably missed," the lawsuit the AP story says, going on:

"The lawsuit said the MPAA’s actions toward the small movie producers ‘were outrageous and were taken with evil motive’."

HOME

Leave a Reply

    Advertisments
Teksavvy