On the one hand, we’re supposed to have a “free market”.
In that scenario, healthy competition has its own way of trumping corporate greed.

On the other hand, we seem to have only monopolies in those areas where this greed has thrived.
Do we truly have a free market?

If enough competition doesn’t exist, how do we propose to address the abuses we see happening, without the support of some kind of “authority” or “laws”? And, if such an authoritarian mechanism were installed, could its enforcement also result in crippling certain innovations that would have benefitted things?

Even in an ideal society, this is a nasty enigma.

As it stands, we know we can’t trust the corporations, as they have the greed and the power of monopoly.
Neither can we trust the government, as they only pay us lip service, tossing us the occasional tidbit, while kissing corporate butt.

Seems the only answer is in the collective hands of the People themselves.
They need to make all kinds of noise all over the place!

All the time I’m typing the last comment, South Park was playing behind me.
It was that episode about 9/11, with Cartman’s presentation on why it was caused by Kyle, and the parents all gathered, talking about not overlooking the possible connection of 9/11 to pretty well everything else going on around them.

To me, it was pretty funny in the light of some of the things I was saying.
YMMV, but I suspect not.
: )

No doubt, we really are being “gamed” on a number of things these days, by a number of different “gamers”. This does make it very difficult for those of us who are aware of the game to trust a lot of things, including our own judgement at times.

The gamers know this effect results, of course, and rely on it in order to keep enough of us confused and fighting amongst ourselves, thus limiting any meaningful organized dissent to their plans.

I think we all take our turns at getting “bent out of shape” on certain issues. (As I said before, I certainly don’t consider myself to be any “poster boy for good behaviour”, nor would I ever put the kind of pressure on myself needed in trying to be.) Sometimes, I think part of the reason is, we occasionally get “plain ol’ sick and tired” of HAVING to always analyse all the bullshit we’re constantly being led through. In an “ideal society”, there would only be good will, and everything would be straightforward, logical, and actually intended to benefit all.

Most of all, I think we get tired of having to question those that, supposedly, were elected “by the People” and (as we’re “taught” to understand it) run our countries. If governments weren’t corrupt, it wouldn’t matter how many corporate behemoths had their greedy sights trained on us, we’d have our say!

I certainly understand why you referenced “astroturfing”.
One easy way to understand how that works is by simply observing certain TV commercial strings, and taking note of how many of the feeble “Brand Power” variety are being aired now. A company creates another company as a veneer, which you’re supposed to interpret as some “neutral testing group”, which in turn advertises its “approval” of various products, all of which are manufactured by the original company that created the veneer company. Personally, the whole thing insults my intelligence, and it’s beyond me how anyone wouldn’t see through this obvious farce, but it must be working to some degree, as this type of advertising seems to be on the increase.

In some real ways, the whole MSM scene is a masterpiece of astroturfing.
I firmly believe that it has been instrumental for a number of years of keeping the masses “dumbed down” to a lot of things.

The main thing I always try to keep in mind throughout everything (and I’m defnitely not saying I’m always successful) is that there’s a lot of activity happening on many fronts right now, much of it intertwined, that we need to pay attention to very closely. We need to not only “get the facts”, but we need to get them from both reliable sources, and from OURSELVES. (We have a great deal of facts presented to us all the time that we often fail to properly record for a variety of reasons. Sometimes, we need to “backtrack” through our own memories and look at it again before we do.)

We need to forget many of the things we were taught about the world, and allow ourselves to consider all sorts of questions our newly-cleansed logic dictates, no matter how “outrageously conspiratorial” we’ve been taught to think they are. In the end, only the solid theories will survive, and those they pertain to may even be forced to answer the hard questions.

In that regard, I would say being an “autodidact” should be a good thing, as you already have the benefit of not having been brainwashed by a number of “preprogrammed” teachings. In the case of a really solid, well-researched conspiracy theory, quite often this preprogramming is all that stands in the way of someone seeing the logic in it.

And, sometimes, the only way to prove a conspiracy of any kind exists is for enough people to throw all the rocks of skepticism they can muster at the theory and witness it survive the pounding.

Personally, Henry, I hope you never change.
Some of us are all “conspiracy”, while some of us are all “skeptics”.
You actually play “both” parts equally well, and doing so causes people to use their brains a little more.

And, if I yanked your chain at some point in any of this, I’m sorry.
It wasn’t my intention, but my presentation might not have helped, as it probably could have been “cleaner”.

[raises thumb]

My weird, psychotic screeds will make more sense afterward

Thanks — serioulsy, I looked back at the DPI thread and….yeah, absolutely I was really edgy.
And you caught the whip-end of it, which I really have to try not to do (unless somebody actually deserves it)

My whole problem is: there’s something fatally wrong with the notion of government “saving” us from corporate abuses, because government usually isn’t that much better about stuff than the corporations themselves. At root, I’m probably just as concerned as you are, but about different things (the mere fact that Google and Microsoft are key players in “Net Neutrality” stinks of, best-case scenario, a corporate hijacking of an otherwise semi-valid point, but then again, I am really cynical.

As for the “panicking conspiracist” argument — cut me some slack on that one, DA. I grew up around some really crazy influences (my heroin-using, White-power skinhead half-brother, for one.) My whole family is about two steps from the gutter, and, while I did extremely well on various standardized tests and suchlike, I primarily consider myself to be something of an “autodidact” (especially in areas relating to computers/technology/politics/corporate accountability, etc.

My problem isn’t so much with the notion of “conspiracies” themselves (from a power-perspective, the entire sociopolitical process is nothing but one vast conspiracy — elites vs. the powerless etc.). My problem is the tendency (not neccesarily attributable to you) for “conspiracy-theorists” to completely disregard what they consider “orthodox” explanations, in favor of poorly-documented, urban-legend type stuff that gets repeated endlessly, and never actually checked out.

Really, I think Net Neutrality is one of those situations where we’re being “gamed”. I mean, Microsoft and Google suddenly have our “best interests” at heart? (I admit Microsoft isn’t evil, so much as fatally inept, and Google isn’t evil, so much as sloppy) — but you see my concerns, right?

Add to that, the fact that it is ISP’s themselves, who seem to be “standing strong” in regard to not blocking TPB, resisting various governments’ attempts at “blacklisting” Internet-sites, etc. — and the picture becomes even murkier.

Personally, I don’t think it’s important what people/organizations say. Rather, it’s what they ACTUALLY DO — and Microsoft ‘allowed’ the NSA to plant backdoor capability into their OS. Google — supposed champion of “Net Neutrality”, helped the Chinese in their attempts to censor Internet connectivity, purely as a MARKET-based decision.

Add to that, the fact that the ability to block/filter stuff has existed pretty much since networking itself has existed, and the whole thing begins to smell like the equivalent of 9/11 for the “digerati”: something nasty happens, or has the POTENTIAL to happen, so a “grassroots” movement (with massive corporate backing) gets us to support sweeping Government intervention to “fix” a problem that hasn’t even happened yet.

So how exactly can I NOT be suspicious?

That’s why I (perhaps reflexively) took the contrary position from everybody else — if for no other reason than SOMEBODY has to step outside the “box”.

But yeah, I did it in my usual fashion — which tends to be extremely intense and sometimes downright brutish.

Sorry about that.
But my points still stand.

Peace out, Y’all

I was never mad at anyone.
I’m not as petty as you were giving me credit for. And, I think I’ve been pretty civil.

I was sincere when I said you were alienating everyone and trying to shut them all down without just cause, and completely overplaying the “panicking conspiracist” argument, no matter how many valid concerns were expressed. That’s a behaviour I would never have accused you of before, and one that I think is beneath you. (Qualifier: In the case of “Sam I Am”, you had superb cause to nail him, and did so with more than enough solid presentation, despite whatever “style” of expression was being used at the time, or whatever hard-on you may have had for him already. : ) )

I thoroughly enjoy your other postings.
Even when I don’t agree, I still absorb your often excellent use of logic and qualification, tempered with some very genuine human expression!
___

“(Can we be pals?)”

If, by “pals”, ya mean you wanna “hang out”… hmmm…
Okay! But you have to promise you’re gonna take your meds more faithfully.
: P
___

As for the post below that, my sentiments exactly!

Spiralfrog WOULD have been kinda almost better than this crap, in that you actually HAD the files (contrary to all the misinformation, transcoding of files is quite possible, and, if done well, need not downgrade the quality that severely.)
But really, why would anybody bother to jump through a bunch of hoops to transcode the files from WMA to something better (like mp3 or Vorbis or something), just for interoperability?
Not worth the hassle.

Then, that’s GOOD!
Let ‘em go completely crazy with it!

I am currently really hot on this subject because the mobile games on my 1gb tf memory card for my phone cannot be moved off the card onto the phone itself or onto another 2gb which I want to upgrade to – Though I can physically copy the file (which I bought and paid for an unlimited use license) I cannot access it from the upgrade card because it says it will only work for the original device EVEN THOUGH IT IS THE SAME PHONE AND SAME NUMBER!! Add me to the list of paying customers that DRM is pissing off – and note that I have solved the problem, no thanks to the (add whatever profane sentiments here) bastards I bought it from.

Ironically, it is only the “pirated” copies of the games THAT I BOUGHT that actually work on the phone I bought them with. Consequence = No more game purchases for the provider.

DRM = Epic FAIL!