Comments on: Sunncomm’s latest DRM idea

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Thu, 23 Sep 2004 06:34:40 +0000

Sounds like a plan. We’ll do it!

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Mon, 23 Aug 2004 15:16:45 +0000

Vinyl is all Ive bought for years

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Mon, 23 Aug 2004 08:20:36 +0000

Let’s hear it for vinyl! ‘Records’ have ‘presence’.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Sun, 22 Aug 2004 22:06:33 +0000

I have a plan that will stop all unathorized digital copying of CDs: Stop making them. Stop making cassettes as well, but they are such a small portion of the market anyway. Go back to vinyl. You have a medium that can still be copied. But the brilliant part is that a record can only be copied poorly in an analog format, and will degrade and wear over time, forcing the user to buy another copy. What more could you ask for?

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Sat, 21 Aug 2004 23:58:20 +0000

“Record labels are seeking a way to let consumers make a limited number of copies of their music – enough for a car, a vacation home and a friend, for example – without allowing for uncontrolled duplication,”

“A FRIEND”??? This is what they said should be a Class-A Felony though, they’re finally giving in somewhat after learning they cant fight it. They basically just contradicted themselves, into saying “Without allowing for uncontrolled duplication” YET want to allow us to make copies for the car, a vacation home AND a friend?? Id say if i can make a copy for a friend and a car, that pretty much falls into “uncontrolled duplication”. These guys at the RIAA are just idiots, lol. Where did they go to college to think up these business practices??