Welcome to P2PNET.net - The original daily p2p and digital news site. Always First!
Register | Login
RIAA News
Cool Stuff
MPAA News
Games / Consoles
News
Music
Movies
TV
Open Source
Mobiles
Advertising
Product News
P2P
Off Topic
Freedom
Politics
Interviews
Security
DRM
Links
Kids and Kartels
Search: 
Search
 
Web P2PNET   
Search: 
Search
Torrent Site Tracker
TekSavvy
 
Add real-time p2pnet headlines to YOUR site ! Click here to download our newsfeed code

Miley Cyrus victim of YouTube porno spam

p2pnet news view | Movies:- Did Miley Cyrus and the Jonas Brothers upload porno flicks to YouTube?

That’s what unidentified posters would have you believe.

Now Google’s YouTube has had to take down hundreds of pornographic videos, says the BBC.

The blue flicks were uploaded in what’s believed to be a planned attack, says the story, going on:

“The material was uploaded under names of famous teenage celebrities such as Hannah Montana and Jonas Brothers.

“Many started with footage of children’s videos before groups of adults performing graphic sex acts appeared on screen.”

YouTube owner Google said it was aware of the uploads and is addressing the problem, the story says.

Follow p2pnet on Twitter.

BBC – Pornographic videos flood YouTube, May 21, 2009


Use free p2pnet newsfeeds for your site. It’s really easy!

Subscribe to p2pnet.net | | rss feed: http://p2pnet.net/p2p.rss | | Mobile – http://p2pnet.net/index-wml.php


Net access blocked by government restrictions? Use Psiphon from the Citizen Lab at the University of Toronto. Go here for details.

HOME

20 Responses to “Miley Cyrus victim of YouTube porno spam”

  1. Qwerty Says:

    Do we live in such a sex obsessed world that people don’t believe that it’s possible that someone could or would want to save themselves till marriage? I definitely I agree with their way of thinking, so why would people actually fall that. Unbelievable, those people are perverts, porn is just a way to exploit people and objectify their sexual nature. It is disgusting to use a persons anatomy when you’ve never met them to pleasure yourself, regardless of how much money they get. This person has a family, friends, a life, but all you now about them is that they are doing the dirty in cheap satin sheets and being taped on a low rent camcorder for $5 a minute; that is the true meaning of objectification, when you no longer care who they are, but will fantasize about them for your own personal pleasure. That’s disgusting, especially to do to people who are teens, and teens who are saving themselves till marriage.

  2. Reader's Write Says:

    “This person has a family, friends, a life, but all you now about them is that they are doing the dirty in cheap satin sheets and being taped on a low rent camcorder for $5 a minute; that is the true meaning of objectification, when you no longer care who they are, but will fantasize about them for your own personal pleasure. That’s disgusting, especially to do to people who are teens, and teens who are saving themselves till marriage.”

    What if you fantasize about marrying them, THEN screwing them?

  3. Reader's Write Says:

    What if you fantasize about screwing them while in church reading the book of Romans, paragraph 16:19? or am i still going to burn in an imaginary hell.

  4. Vato Loco Says:

    Things like Qwerty’s comment is what makes silly things like porn spam on youtube worth it. (No offense intended).

    By the way, p2pnet should make a post about Mexico’s government attempt and censoring Youtube, when some user uploaded a parody video of a popular song changing the lyrics meaning to make fun of a local governor (Fidel Herrera).

  5. eXistenZ Says:

    http://www.encyclopediadramatica.com/Operation_YouTube

    It was called operation youtube

  6. Reader's Write Says:

    I happen to know miley, I will ask her what she thinks of the videos uploaded using her name. She already has many accounts created claiming to be her across the web. I’m sure she won’t be too thrilled.

  7. RadialSkid Says:

    Qwerty:

    Since when is it bad to admire the human form and to embrace sexuality? To deny sexual desire is to deny your humanity. “Objectify” is the most pernicious, ridiculous word that the PC police have ever shat out.

    And some of us don’t believe in marriage, for the record.

  8. Daynah Says:

    Oh i get it RadialSkid so basically when your watching porn you justify it by believing its ok because all your doing is admiring the human form..you only watch it to embrace sexuality..nah i didnt think so..if people were so into admiring the human form they would go to a art class and paint the person posing naked..that would be admiring the human form..admiring the human form doesnt mean it has to be sexual..painting someone naked is simply admiring the beauty of the shape..eg curves of the body…
    and QUERTY isnt saying its bad to admire the numan form..theyre just saying it doesnt mean you have to watch people having sex to do so and for those ” of us don’t believe in marriage, for the record.”….then if your happy to have relationship after relationship without any real commitment to the person your sleeping with…Then thats your choice…personally it makes me sick…

  9. Jon Says:

    “I happen to know miley”

    ^^ If this is for real, I’d be interested to know what she thinks …

    Cheers!

  10. Lexi V Says:

    I don’t really like “that stuff.” These guys are saving themselves till marriage, and the p spammers are trying to ruin their lives! So I’m only watching JB videos from the official channel, (music videos that is ) , and I’m staying away from those videos. Youtube should ban the people that spammed the porn. I don’t really like using that word, and so do some other young kids. I don’t wanna start arguments, but yes i do love the Jonas Brothers. :) Im actually 12, and i have cursed a little. What about people calling me a fake cause i don’t use my real first name (Sasha) i prefer not to use my real first name for secruity reasons. All of my friends online are trusted, and some sites don’t care if your 12. Thats MINOR compared to what happened yesterday.

  11. Daynah Says:

    It just shows how times have changed..i mean ”Lexi V” is only 12 she speaks as if she were older…At 12 years old i had no idea what porn was.
    Not because i was niave or dumb..just because that kind of thing was never really brought up at school,or anywhere when i was that age..

  12. RadialSkid Says:

    “Oh i get it RadialSkid so basically when your watching porn you justify it by believing its ok because all your doing is admiring the human form”

    No, if I’m watching actual porn, I justify it by believing it’s okay because this is a free country, and I’m not ashamed of sex or sexuality.

    “admiring the human form doesnt mean it has to be sexual”

    The trouble is, some people call nude magazines like Playboy “porn” when they don’t feature actual sex acts. Where is the line drawn?

    “then if your happy to have relationship after relationship without any real commitment to the person your sleeping with”

    There’s that damn word….”commitment.” Define “commitment.” How does having a blood test and a slip of paper and making the woman change her last name make the couple any more “commited?”

    And I don’t have “relationship after relationship.” I’m one of those (apparently rare) individuals who prefers being single.

  13. f4te Says:

    lol, 4chan, you guys kill me, hahaha

  14. Daynah Says:

    The trouble is, some people call nude magazines like Playboy “porn” when they don’t feature actual sex acts.

    Well there you go again you don’t have to go out and buy a magazine with naked women in it to”admire” the human form..and not for one split second am i actually going to believe thats why you buy magazines like playboy..

    No, if I’m watching actual porn, I justify it by believing it’s okay because this is a free country, and I’m not ashamed of sex or sexuality.

    Ok,i get your point here,im not ashamed of sex or sexuality either,,when its in the privacy of the peoples home and is only between the people involved..i don’t agree with it being splashed across the internet for people to watch total strangers having sex and then get of by it.

    There’s that damn word….”commitment.” Define “commitment.” How does having a blood test and a slip of paper and making the woman change her last name make the couple any more “commited?”

    Ok,, To commit is to pledge yourself to a certain purpose or line of conduct.If you love someone then i agree a piece of paper doesnt change anything.But marrying the person is the final step in proving that they want to be together forever,,hopefully without cheating.The fact is people who love someone and want to be with them forever but don’t want to marry..are just providing themselves with an easy escape root if anything did go wrong.They dont want to marry incase they split up and have to go through a divorce.so for those who dont want to get married its just to lighten the hassle at the end of the relationship..

    And I don’t have “relationship after relationship.” I’m one of those (apparently rare) individuals who prefers being single.

    Clearly why you wont commit to anyone,because if you were in a relationship you would always be thinking you would prefer being single and if you commited to the person it would be harder to get out off

  15. Devil's Advocate Says:

    Personally, I could never see why “marriage” is somehow the only acceptible way to express “real commitment”.

    The only reason the marriage process exists is because of RELIGION.
    People marry “for the Church”. Even when the marriage takes place outside of church, the words and procedure used are still a product of the church.

    Many people don’t have any religious affiliations. Many of those, oddly enough, go to church and get married, as the whole idea has probably been engraved into their brains from birth by previous generations. As for the rest, what actual incentive would they have to follow the Status Quo?

    It’s not “the Church” you need to satisfy… it’s YOURSELVES.
    Commitment only results when it already exists, not because people “vowed” it would.

    I’ve never believed in the Institution of Marriage, even as a kid. Couldn’t see the logic.
    I saw just as many married people have short, failed relationships as those that weren’t married, and for all the same reasons.
    I will never marry, yet, the shortest “Common Law” relationship I’ve ever had is 12 years – and I’m still in it!

    Marriage is a product of religion.
    And, religion itself is losing acceptance, as human intelligence is questioning the very logic of it more and more.

  16. RadialSkid Says:

    “and not for one split second am i actually going to believe thats why you buy magazines like playboy.”

    Why else would I read it? The movie reviews? Apparently you don’t understand the concepts or mentalities involved with masturbation. Fine.

    “The fact is people who love someone and want to be with them forever but don’t want to marry..are just providing themselves with an easy escape root if anything did go wrong.”

    Given that half of marriages end in divorce, I think accepting the possibility of a relationship ending it’s the first step towards something commonly known as “maturity.” The naive, head-in-the-clouds mentality that your love is “truer” than anyone elses’ is anything but mature.

    Devil’s Advocate: I agree entirely. Even taking religion out of the equation, I don’t see the appeal of getting the government involved in something as intimate as a romantic relationship.

  17. sparkling princess 1 Says:

    now I speak for everybody that I say I think that miley did do it but I think she did it as a joke to like 1of her friends like 2morrow
    justin timberlake MIT do it so leave my rolemodel ALONE!!!!!!!!!before I call her cause I’m her friendand she won’t be pleased so THERE and by the way miley wouldent do that she don’t lie

  18. Marty Robertson Says:

    Well, as usual, the teens have totally overused something. This time it is digital porn. All the perverts in the world could not accomplish what these eager children and thier cell phones have done. I am bored with seeing britneys whoo-who. I actually glancede at and then deleted a shot of Sharon stone that totally eclipsed the leg crossing in that movie. What good is it for movie stars to show all when the kids are swapping pics of the all to gether and couples make thier own Amature videos? I say let ‘em. They will get tired and move on to something else and fifty years from now we will have forgot.

  19. erik Says:

    man if miley cyrus keeps taking these pics of her nobody will like her except dumb people.then she wont have any more fans like me I know alot of people who like her then once they saw those pics the bearly liked her any more

  20. erik Says:

    man if miley cyrus keeps taking these pics of her nobody will like her except dumb people.then she wont have any more fans like me I know alot of people who like her then once they saw those pics the bearly liked her any more.then she will end up like those skanks in playboys witch she already is

Leave a Reply

Please no Spam, flaming (attacking others), trolling, and posting off-topic. Thanks.

    Advertisements
MP3Rocket


Remove Spyware with AntiSpyware for Windows®