Comments on: RIAA v Tenenbaum webcasting: redux? http://www.p2pnet.net/story/22528 p2pnet.net - reader powered Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:11:09 -0300 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Reader's Write http://www.p2pnet.net/story/22528/comment-page-1#comment-975234 Reader's Write Tue, 02 Jun 2009 16:39:10 +0000 http://www.p2pnet.net/?p=22528#comment-975234 Even if broacasting the trial is forbiden (I woder under what law!) I hope that people will be able to bring cam-corders or at least audio digital recorders into the court so at least we will know what is going on. Even if they try to prevent people from bringing these into the court if enought people try, some will get through. I thought that court trial should always be public, What kind of shit is that not to allow the broadcasting of the court proceeding? We the people have the right to know and we must! Even if broacasting the trial is forbiden (I woder under what law!) I hope that people will be able to bring cam-corders or at least audio digital recorders into the court so at least we will know what is going on. Even if they try to prevent people from bringing these into the court if enought people try, some will get through.

I thought that court trial should always be public, What kind of shit is that not to allow the broadcasting of the court proceeding?

We the people have the right to know and we must!

]]>