RIAA ISP copyright cops: epic fail
p2pnet news view RIAA | P2P:- In January, “
We are not working with them on this,” said Verizon spokeswoman Ellen Yu in Wired.
Comcast, “declined to comment, and referred inquiries to the National Cable & Telecommunications Association” whereupon, “The group’s vice president, Brian Dietz, said he could not confirm any deals …” The NCTA, “represents dozens of cable internet providers,” said the story.
AT&T, “declined comment through a spokesman,” and Time Warner Cable, Cox Communications and Charter Communications, “did not return repeated phone calls for comment”.
Hmmmmm, said p2pnet, going on:
“Strange, that. Because just before Christmas, ‘After years of persecuting and terrorising thousands of innocent families and their children across the United States, Vivendi Universal, EMI, Warner Music and Sony BMG are trying another way to to force people to use their ‘product’.”
Their RIAA is, “set to drop its legal assault as it searches for more effective ways to combat online music piracy,” said the Wall Street Journal.
Because the RIAA took it as read that ISPs would step right up and act as corporate copyright cops.
After all, Vivendi Universal, EMI, Warner Music and Sony Music say it’s good business to alienate consumers by suing them. So why shouldn’t ISPs be willing to help out by providing ‘evidence’ of file sharing on the part of their own customers?
That was late last year and by now, the RIAA plan should be running nicely under full-steam with Internet Service Providers happily implementing the Big 4’s Three Strikes and you’ re Gone policy in America, one would have thought.
However, “Six months later, the music industry is still waiting to hear from the RIAA which ISPs have explicitly agreed to work with the association,” as CNet News points out.
“When the RIAA first announced its new antipiracy project, it didn’t name partners. Behind the scenes, industry insiders assured the media that the group would disclose the names of partner ISPs ‘within weeks’.”
But not one ISP has publicly acknowledged working with the RIAA on a “graduated response.”
“According to the ISP executive who asked for anonymity because he’s involved in negotiations with the music sector, the RIAA’s tactics in dealing with the ISPs have been too heavy handed,” says the story.
The RIAA !? Heavy handed? Surely not !
Political muscle
The executive, “complained that the RIAA has tried to use Andrew Cuomo to push the ISPs into helping,” says CNet. “But Cuomo doesn’t have the kind of political muscle to sway the major ISPs when they are acting well within the law, the executive said.
Cuomo? Isn’t he the New York State attorney general?
“Enlisting the major on- and offline print and electronic media as unpaid PR pumps, with Rupert Murdoch’s Wall Street Journal as the principal mouthpiece and New York attorney general Andrew Cuomo as coordinator, Vivendi Universal (France), Sony BMG (Japan and Germany), EMI (Britain), and Warner Music(US) are now touting ISPs as corporate copyright cops,” p2pnet posted shortly after the news broke.
“In the WSJ, they say their Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) will, ‘try an approach that relies on the cooperation of Internet-service providers’,” we said, continuing »»»
The newspaper doesn’t say if the RIAA is paying Cuomo for his services, or if New York taxpayers are subsidising him on behalf of the Big $ labels.
If the former, surely that’s a serious breach of New York laws, and if the latter, shouldn’t Cuomo resign on the grounds he can’t possibly represent the people who elected him when he’s also acting in vested corporate interests?
Six months on, “We keeping hearing about how (Cuomo) is supposed to make this happen,” CNet has the executive saying.
But, “You don’t see much changing, do you?”
No. You don’t.
Meanwhile, “Every day that passes we realize how important Internet connectivity is to people’s lives,” the story quotes EFF legal director Cindy Cohn as saying, adding:
“The RIAA looks so out of step with what most people think is a reasonable response to (copyright) infringing behavior. Even to the people that believe we’re locked into this 19th century view of copyright law, the RIAA looks hysterical.”
p2pnet – Big 4’s RIAA to drop mass lawsuits, December 19, 2009
Wall Street Journal – Music Industry to Abandon Mass Suits, December 19, 2008
CNet News – Six months later, no ISPs joining RIAA piracy fight, June 3, 2009
news broke – New York AG Andrew Cuomo: RIAA coordinator, December 24, 2008
Use free p2pnet newsfeeds for your site. It’s really easy! Subscribe to p2pnet.net | | rss feed: http://p2pnet.net/p2p.rss | | Mobile – http://p2pnet.net/index-wml.php
Net access blocked by government restrictions? Use Psiphon from the Citizen Lab at the University of Toronto. Go here for details.







June 4th, 2009 at 3:07 pm
Just because they say they haven’t made any agreements doesn’t mean they haven’t
made any agreements. All this means is that they may not want anyone to know about
any agreements until all of the isp’s are on board. Lying is the language of the mega corp.
June 4th, 2009 at 5:23 pm
Comcast and AT&T probably already signed and took shipment of brand new Porches …
June 4th, 2009 at 10:21 pm
You think just because you have and idea, you own it? For thousands of years humankind has been free to communicate and share anything they wish with their neighbors. The internet is simply an extension of this basic concept. It was perfectly normal while I was growing up to swap books, movies, games, music and just about anything else you can think of. We have all been raised to think of sharing as caring. Now instead of simply being able to communicate with the folks next door, each of us can now communicate with every single living person on planet Earth thanks to the internet. What the entertainment industry is demanding of ISP’s simply isn’t possible. Deep packet inspection and other forms of monitoring is no different than the government listening in on every single conversation that every single human on this planet will ever have over their entire lifetime. In addition, three strikes rules and other similar ideas are the equivalent of gagging and shackling someone alone in a jail cell simply for communicating something the governing body doesn’t agree with. There are a number of names for leaders that try to rule their country in this exact same fashion. Fascist, tyrant, dictator. You take your pick. Copyright or no, history has shown time and again that a governing body simply cannot succeed at silencing it’s people. Ever. History also shows that if you push the common folk too far, they will eventually fight back with a vengeance. All art is culture and culture will always belong to the people. Trying to get rich off of culture has always been a foolhardy venture with great risk. If the entertainment industry, ISP’s and government’s of this planet cannot figure out these simplest of truths, then they deserve what they have coming to them.
June 4th, 2009 at 11:22 pm
I’m sure the ISP are in full agreement with the **AAs, the only issue being who shoulders the financial burden. The ISPs would naturally like someone to pay them for the millions of DMCA claims they’ve already enforced, let alone additional enforcement.
June 5th, 2009 at 1:08 pm
There is a law that make it a crime to give money to terrorists.
So if you buy anything or give any money to one of the 7 majors entetainment companies lawers or leaders also member of the RIAA/MPAA/IFPI/BPI/SACEM/BREM. . . . “Fill the blank”
Also do not seattle do not settle and do not settle!
They are terrorists!