Welcome to P2PNET.net - The original daily p2p and digital news site. Always First!
Register | Login
RIAA News
Cool Stuff
MPAA News
Games / Consoles
News
Music
Movies
TV
Open Source
Mobiles
Advertising
Product News
P2P
Off Topic
Freedom
Politics
Interviews
Security
DRM
Links
Kids and Kartels
Search: 
Search
 
Web P2PNET   
Search: 
Search
Torrent Site Tracker
MP3Rocket
 
Add real-time p2pnet headlines to YOUR site ! Click here to download our newsfeed code

Jammie Thomas-Rasset: file sharing thief

p2pnet news view RIAA | P2P:- In just five days, the multi-billion-dollar members of the international record label club will once again try to hustle a judge and jury into believing Jammie Thomas-Rasset — pictured here holding nine-month-old baby Tarent — is a criminal and thief, a,  ‘massive online distributor’ of copyrighted corporate music.

With their Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) as a front, sub-units of Vivendi Universal (France), Sony (Japan), EMI (Britain), and Warner Music (US) have already put Jammie and her family through hell.

First, they used the mainstream media to have her publicly tried, and found guilty, of the non-existent crime of illegal file sharing.

Then, she and her family had to endure another trial, this time before a judge and jury, at the end of which she was ordered to pay the corporate music industry almost a quarter of a million dollars in ‘damages’.

But the only suggestion Jammie had ever downloaded, or shared music on discredited p2p file sharing application Kazaa, came from MediaSentry, an equally discredited company used by the RIAA (and later fired by the RIAA) to collect ‘evidence’.

Soon after the case was over, however, judge Michael Davis, who’d heard it, declared a mistrial, admitting he’d committed a, “manifest error of law” by telling the jury the, “act of making copyrighted sound recordings available for electronic distribution on a peer-to-peer network, without licensefrom the copyright owners, violates the copyright owners’ exclusive right of distribution, regardless of whether actual distribution has been shown”.

Now, next Monday, because the two sides failed to reach a settlement agreement, Jammie and her lawyer, Kiwi K.A.D. Camara, will be standing alone against the RIAA legal teams.

There’s no way of telling exactly how much the Big 4 labels and their RIAA have already spent on the case, but it’s in the hundreds of thousands of dollars. And now they’ll be spending even more as they try to gull the judge and jury into ruling against Jammie for a second time, saying she’s a conscienceless ‘violator’ of corporate copyrights who, along with others of her ilk, are steadily and routinely depriving honest, but hard-pressed, music industry companies of their rightful earnings.

They claim files shared equal sales lost, although a number of authoritative academic and other studies say this isn’t so, and that file sharing is in fact an invaluable form of viral advertising.

As US judge James P. Jones wrote »»»

Customers who download music and movies for free would not necessarily spend money to acquire the same product.

However, this isn’t about money: it’s about circumventing any form of competition and gaining complete control of the Internet as the primary vehicle for distributing, marketing, advertising and selling corporate digital ‘product’ online.

Who, ask the lawyers and the Big 4 executives they advise, cares about the customers — the people who make it all happen?

They’ll sit by and silently watch it happen. Like they always do.

innocent men, women and children

While the lawyers and hangers-on working for the RIAA happily clock up thousands of billable hours, Jamie Thomas-Rasset tries to get on with her life.

The labels and their RIAA  have spent a fortune trying to paint a picture of her as someone who stole, and who then illegally distributed, copyrighted music files.

However, with file sharing, no money changes hands and no one is deprived permanently, or otherwise, of something he or she used to own.

The RIAA lawyers say she’s a thief. But she’s nothing of the kind. Rather, she’s a hard-working mother who during the day is the Brownfield coordinator of the Mille Lacs Band of Ojibwe Indians in Minnesota. She’s responsible for administering a grant from the US Environmental Protection Agency for her tribe to redevelop contaminated properties.

She’s also in charge of housing and land acquisitions for the Band’s Department of Natural Resources and Environment

“I try to focus on the day to day of life instead of the potential outcomes,” she says.  “I know, win lose or draw, it won’t be over for a long time. So I just hunker down for the long haul and hold on for the ride.”

Going clockwise, other than baby Tarent, the kids in the picture are Christian, her four-year-old stepson, Tyler, who’ll be 15 next month, and Triston, who’ll be 13 in August.

Jammie and her husband, Chad (”Chad Thomas-Rasset, we both hyphenated”) were married in February. He’s at home, taking care of the boys so Jammie can get on with her job without having to worry about the younger two in daycare.

“What’s it like, having this hanging over your head,” I asked Jammie.

“Actually, the case from day to day is sort of like the feeling you have something really important to do, yet you’re not quite there yet to do it,” she said, going on »»»

“The stress of the case is always there, but it’s manageable most days.

We still get up every morning, the boys go to school, or they did until summer break started this week, I still go to work, Chaddie, my husband still takes care of the babies.  We have a routine and fortunately, the case doesn’t really disrupt that, at least for the most part.

But lately, stress level has hit its maximum load and although I hate admitting it, a constant panicky feeling has taken hold.

I understand the consequences of my case, not just for me, but for everyone else being sued by the RIAA, and sometimes it’s a bit overwhelming.

Now, with the trial starting next week, I find it hard to concentrate on much else.

I constantly worry “maybe if we do this” or “maybe we should do that”, then I have to slow down, take a breath and ask myself,e “what’s the worst that could happen?”

But the worst, in my opinion, has already happened.

“Positive thinking and reassurance a major thing that gets us through this ordeal,” says Chad.

“When I got a subpoena to testify in court my first thought was, ‘Who’s gonna watch the kids?’

“But  I was happy and very excited about the lawyers that stepped up to take over.  They have no idea the burden they have relieved from this family.”

Innocent, and very ordinary, men, women and children

For the RIAA crews, leaving thousands of American families in fear is just a job, and one they’re paid very handsomely indeed to perform.

They go home at night, play with their children, pat the dog, and rest easy.

For their victims, though, it’s pain, nonstop, tears, sleepless nights, and for some, even thoughts of suicide.

Jammie, and Tanya Andersen, and Patti Santangelo, and Rae-Jay Schwartz and Marie Lindor are only five of the people brutalised by RIAA lawyers in what are called courts of law.

But every single one of the 40,000 people who have received RIAA subpoenas has sat back in shock, wondering how they can possibly take on a hugely wealthy Vivendi Universal, EMI, Warner Music and Sony Music with their immense legal, financial and political resources?

The answer is: they can’t, and the people who run, and who work for, the RIAA such as it’s bosses, Mitch Bainwol and Cary Sherman, and Cara Duckworth and Jonathan Lamy, know it as they accuse their victims of stealing, when nothing’s been stolen, of being criminals, when no crime has been committed, of having caused misery to record industry workers, when the people behind the ‘trade’ association are wholly to blame.

Jammie is just one of the completely innocent, and very ordinary, men, women and children across America whose lives have been made almost unbearable by threats of law suits and fines they’d never be able to pay.

However, they’re not alone.

With every passing day, more and more people open Net accounts and log on to become part of the huge, ever-growing, online communities who by-pass the traditional media, acting as their own sources of news and information.

Once upon a time, Big Music had everything its own way.

But not any more.

Stay tuned.

Jon Newton – p2pnet

Follow p2pnet on Twitter.

June, 2009


Use free p2pnet newsfeeds for your site. It’s really easy!

Subscribe to p2pnet.net | | rss feed: http://p2pnet.net/p2p.rss | | Mobile – http://p2pnet.net/index-wml.php


Net access blocked by government restrictions? Use Psiphon from the Citizen Lab at the University of Toronto. Go here for details.

HOME

19 Responses to “Jammie Thomas-Rasset: file sharing thief”

  1. Reader's Write Says:

    Her husband Chad looks like actor Larry Drake in that picture. :)

  2. RK Says:

    I know the feeling. It is amazing how quiet the radio is about the upcoming trial. Perhaps they should get a little more vocal, as the RIAA is pushing away from their Payola scheme to now charge the radio stations to play “their” music. Win Loose or draw, Jammie is a hero. She may not feel that way now, but her ground breaking courage and determination is to be applauded. With Jammie stands Tanya Andersen, Debbie Foster, and Joel Tenenbaum. They simply love music. None is a criminal, just ordinary people caught up in this insanity. We keep praying. As for the RIAA folks, well, we pray for them too. RK

  3. Reader's Write Says:

    I don’t know that much about this case but why was this lady not able to settle for a few grand like all of the other people who got sued?

  4. henwy Says:

    Because she chose not to settle, instead deciding on the ridiculous path of telling lies.

  5. Reader's Write Says:

    This makes me so angry that this woman got fined $80,000 per song! Absolutely ridiculous. It was probably her kids that used her computer to download the songs. KAZAA by default makes you share any media files on your computer and if you are not tech savvy you would not know how to change the default. Picking people out of a hat to sue is terrible when most of the people doing the downloading/sharing are kids. In this information age sharing digital files cannot be stopped. The music industry needs to find a way to be innovative to make money instead of fighting a loosing battle trying to get people to stop sharing. This poor woman had some songs on her computer that were so easy to obtain and everyone else in the world is doing the same thing if you are between the ages of 10 – 30 years old. So many artists would never have even been heard of before if their music was not shared. $80,000 per song is terrible, how is that even a fair number? Those jurors have no common sense.

  6. surfer Says:

    ‘Because she chose not to settle, instead deciding on the ridiculous path of telling lies.’

    the RIAA called, they want their opinion back..

  7. surfer Says:

    post all you want shill/troll..

    the result of this will be massive, and life changing. I always thought you were suicidal, and you have confirmed this assumption.

    the results of this victory will be as sweet as your victory over Napster, and The Pirate Bay, enjoy.

  8. AAIR Says:

    Hummm, $80,000, the number is so huge it has comma. I wonder what they’ll do to her. Repossess her house?

  9. Cass Says:

    “being made and example of” is not justice. This is completely ridiculous!

  10. gtr33 Says:

    File sharing forever!!!!

  11. YokoYoko Says:

    Here’s what Cary Sherman had to say … http://politicomix.blogspot.com/2009/06/winning-hearts-and-minds.html

  12. Reader's Write Says:

    Cary Sherman is an idiot

  13. bullshit Says:

    This just shows what kinda people run the music industry these days.

  14. Funky_F Says:

    I remember a great Southpark episode about this subject. Now it seems so real…. Now I’m even glad I live in a country that’s underdeveloped, cause nobody cares about Internet content and I can download or upload sh.tloads of copyrighted stuff without caring. Anyway, this is an obvious transgression of human rights because the fine is so high it’s putting her and her children in danger… RIAA is the criminal here!

  15. BOYCOTT Says:

    Vivendi Universal, EMI, Warner Music and Sony Music ARE BULLIES. I am boycotting Vivendi Universal, EMI, Warner Music and Sony Music – will not buy their products, music or movies because of this. This can happen to anyone: you, your family, your friends – this poor woman needs to get on the newsmedia and speak out about the ridiculous fine. Totally RIDICULOUS! PEOPLE GET OUTRAGED – BOYCOTT THESE COMPANIES UNTIL THEY LEAVE THIS WOMAN AND HER CHILDREN ALONE! Don’t leave this poor family to the wolves!

  16. Not Suprised Says:

    I wonder what would happen if most people stop buying media of all types. No going to movies, buying music media, movies, or video games, avoiding software (for the most part) for, say, a month to start with. Imagine the impact. We shouldn’t reward bad behavior. These companies seem to forget they exsist at our leisure. Plus I though piracy is stealing something to make a profit. I wonder if the RIAA and the MPAA will go after companies who produce blank media and HDD manufactorers?? Oh wait, most of them would have to sue themselves. That would be interesting to see happen.

  17. Catt C. Says:

    So far, the RIAA hasn’t gotten any money from me in over four years. Every time I find out about another regular joe getting sued by these greedy sharks, I mark my calendar. From that moment, I don’t buy any music at all for six months from any retailer. Second hand CD’s and videos from thrift shops sometimes, but nothing that will give even a half-penny to that collection of family rapists.

    I got this idea from another poster years ago, and I liked the idea of protesting with my wallet. You’re all welcome to do the same.

    On that subject, though, does anyone have a list of musical artists that protest these vampiric practices and refuse to play with them? THOSE I will buy from!

  18. Reader's Write Says:

    Welcome to the land of the brave and the free. I wonder if the member companies of the RIAA get discounts when they buy judges and politicians in bulk.

  19. Fernsy Says:

    They don’t buy them! Don’t be so silly: they download them from piratebay!

Leave a Reply

Please no Spam, flaming (attacking others), trolling, and posting off-topic. Thanks.

    Advertisements
TekSavvy


Remove Spyware with AntiSpyware for Windows®