<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Death of the 8-track tape</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/22938/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/22938</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 23:08:56 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/22938/comment-page-1#comment-975781</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 14:58:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/?p=22938#comment-975781</guid>
		<description>&quot;yes, there are safer methods of acquiring ‘content’, and I dont personally condone or use it, however, during technical testing to search for MediaDefender, I am satisfied with its’ level of security using PeerGuardian. nor do I endorse PeerGuardian, it was just the tool I used for the experiment.

i still maintain my opinion of uneducated use of bittorrent is very dangerous, and unsafe.&quot;

At the moment, Usenet newsgroups and sites like Rapidshare are the safest method of downloading music or recent movies. Public file sharing networks like BitTorrent seem relatively safe for older movies and TV shows.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;yes, there are safer methods of acquiring ‘content’, and I dont personally condone or use it, however, during technical testing to search for MediaDefender, I am satisfied with its’ level of security using PeerGuardian. nor do I endorse PeerGuardian, it was just the tool I used for the experiment.</p>
<p>i still maintain my opinion of uneducated use of bittorrent is very dangerous, and unsafe.&#8221;</p>
<p>At the moment, Usenet newsgroups and sites like Rapidshare are the safest method of downloading music or recent movies. Public file sharing networks like BitTorrent seem relatively safe for older movies and TV shows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: surfer</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/22938/comment-page-1#comment-975661</link>
		<dc:creator>surfer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 02:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/?p=22938#comment-975661</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1042877/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Cadillac Records&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1042877/" rel="nofollow">Cadillac Records</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/22938/comment-page-1#comment-975639</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 21:05:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/?p=22938#comment-975639</guid>
		<description>The 8 track not only had better sound fidelity, it had better stereo separation because the wider tape allowed the tracks to be separated by a larger space between them. It was the same width as the reel to reel. What the 8 track did not have was better frequency response, rewind, nor space saving package that the cassette did. Both were poor containers for music because the sun would ruin the tape, the heads would become magnetized and degrade the upper frequencies, or even that the tape laid upon itself layer upon layer and that contributed to high frequency loss too, because of the residual magnetism in the recording on the tape would tend to reduce the high frequencies bit by bit over time. Nor was the tape format particularly durable. Given enough time, the tape would become tacky as it aged, meaning that it would sooner or later wrap on the spindle that moved the tape and cause it to eat the tape. 

My days of music go back to remembering the 45 vinyl records, back when the major labels didn&#039;t sell albums so much, the main market was the single A and B side. This is where the sales market is once again. Because as mentioned, no one wants the filler and the filler represents unwanted music that is not worth the price, making the cost of an album the price for the one or two good songs. While the album was where the profit was, the majors screwed people so badly over the buying of the album, people began to see the cost of the album as a rip off. 

They have no one to blame but themselves because of the direction that music sales has taken. With subpar bands &quot;made&quot; and the back catalog being pushed on the radio all the time. Funny, songs 30 years old are more expensive today than they were when they came out! Since they are no longer the hot Top 40 hits, that is certainly a rip off. No wonder no one wants to pay for their stuff any more. If you think about it, this is most likely the start of where file sharing got it&#039;s popular approval, not the lack of wanting to see the artist get paid but the constant screwing the majors did to the customers. They are receiving their just deserts now and it doesn&#039;t seem to sit so well with them as it did when it was the customer getting screwed. Amazing isn&#039;t it.

The music industry has been screwing both the customer and artist for far longer than 20 years. Before the introduction of Rock and Roll, Blues, and Country, it was the Big Band era. The Big Bands became sort of dead musically for the younger generation that desired something with a little more snap to it. 

Back in the 1920&#039;s blues were being sang by the blacks and it was relativity unknown to the radio listening public. When it was felt that The Blues would be the next big thing for racially directed and aimed music, they set out to secure works of the blues. Only the blues artists were harder to find than what the artists of the time were playing for public consumption. What resulted was the roaming agent, recording blues works where ever they could find the artists. Often that was in the Mississippi Delta area. The artists were told that the agent would like to record their music for showing back in Hollywood. If they signed the agreement, they were then paid somewhere around $10 for the song and turned over all rights to it. 

Now today, major labels have a real problem with mix tapes and mashes. Hip Hop suffers distinctly from this as they tend to take snippets of music and mix it into their work, making a new work. During that time, major labels had no troubles with it. Popular artists of the time were welcomed and encouraged to listen to the recordings, steal the licks from the music, and incorporate it into their own songs which would be later recorded as yet more major label works. Elvis Presley was one of those artists that blended blues and rhythm into yet an entirely different set of works but have strong works in the blues. 

But stealing from the artists was an established practice in the 20&#039;s before the Great Depression.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 8 track not only had better sound fidelity, it had better stereo separation because the wider tape allowed the tracks to be separated by a larger space between them. It was the same width as the reel to reel. What the 8 track did not have was better frequency response, rewind, nor space saving package that the cassette did. Both were poor containers for music because the sun would ruin the tape, the heads would become magnetized and degrade the upper frequencies, or even that the tape laid upon itself layer upon layer and that contributed to high frequency loss too, because of the residual magnetism in the recording on the tape would tend to reduce the high frequencies bit by bit over time. Nor was the tape format particularly durable. Given enough time, the tape would become tacky as it aged, meaning that it would sooner or later wrap on the spindle that moved the tape and cause it to eat the tape. </p>
<p>My days of music go back to remembering the 45 vinyl records, back when the major labels didn&#8217;t sell albums so much, the main market was the single A and B side. This is where the sales market is once again. Because as mentioned, no one wants the filler and the filler represents unwanted music that is not worth the price, making the cost of an album the price for the one or two good songs. While the album was where the profit was, the majors screwed people so badly over the buying of the album, people began to see the cost of the album as a rip off. </p>
<p>They have no one to blame but themselves because of the direction that music sales has taken. With subpar bands &#8220;made&#8221; and the back catalog being pushed on the radio all the time. Funny, songs 30 years old are more expensive today than they were when they came out! Since they are no longer the hot Top 40 hits, that is certainly a rip off. No wonder no one wants to pay for their stuff any more. If you think about it, this is most likely the start of where file sharing got it&#8217;s popular approval, not the lack of wanting to see the artist get paid but the constant screwing the majors did to the customers. They are receiving their just deserts now and it doesn&#8217;t seem to sit so well with them as it did when it was the customer getting screwed. Amazing isn&#8217;t it.</p>
<p>The music industry has been screwing both the customer and artist for far longer than 20 years. Before the introduction of Rock and Roll, Blues, and Country, it was the Big Band era. The Big Bands became sort of dead musically for the younger generation that desired something with a little more snap to it. </p>
<p>Back in the 1920&#8217;s blues were being sang by the blacks and it was relativity unknown to the radio listening public. When it was felt that The Blues would be the next big thing for racially directed and aimed music, they set out to secure works of the blues. Only the blues artists were harder to find than what the artists of the time were playing for public consumption. What resulted was the roaming agent, recording blues works where ever they could find the artists. Often that was in the Mississippi Delta area. The artists were told that the agent would like to record their music for showing back in Hollywood. If they signed the agreement, they were then paid somewhere around $10 for the song and turned over all rights to it. </p>
<p>Now today, major labels have a real problem with mix tapes and mashes. Hip Hop suffers distinctly from this as they tend to take snippets of music and mix it into their work, making a new work. During that time, major labels had no troubles with it. Popular artists of the time were welcomed and encouraged to listen to the recordings, steal the licks from the music, and incorporate it into their own songs which would be later recorded as yet more major label works. Elvis Presley was one of those artists that blended blues and rhythm into yet an entirely different set of works but have strong works in the blues. </p>
<p>But stealing from the artists was an established practice in the 20&#8217;s before the Great Depression.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: surfer</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/22938/comment-page-1#comment-975625</link>
		<dc:creator>surfer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 17:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/?p=22938#comment-975625</guid>
		<description>yes, there are safer methods of acquiring &#039;content&#039;, and I dont personally condone or use it, however, during technical testing to search for MediaDefender, I am satisfied with its&#039; level of security using PeerGuardian. nor do I endorse PeerGuardian, it was just the tool I used for the experiment.

i still maintain my opinion of uneducated use of bittorrent is very dangerous, and unsafe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes, there are safer methods of acquiring &#8216;content&#8217;, and I dont personally condone or use it, however, during technical testing to search for MediaDefender, I am satisfied with its&#8217; level of security using PeerGuardian. nor do I endorse PeerGuardian, it was just the tool I used for the experiment.</p>
<p>i still maintain my opinion of uneducated use of bittorrent is very dangerous, and unsafe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/22938/comment-page-1#comment-975620</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 16:47:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/?p=22938#comment-975620</guid>
		<description>&quot;Install PeerGuardian and surf all the bittorrent music you can fit on your hard-drive, and enjoy.&quot;

You previously said that anyone still using BitTorrent was a clueless loser, or words to that effect...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Install PeerGuardian and surf all the bittorrent music you can fit on your hard-drive, and enjoy.&#8221;</p>
<p>You previously said that anyone still using BitTorrent was a clueless loser, or words to that effect&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Devil's Advocate</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/22938/comment-page-1#comment-975618</link>
		<dc:creator>Devil's Advocate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 16:36:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/?p=22938#comment-975618</guid>
		<description>&quot;Then came phase-shifting. The ability to transpose one format to another for use on multiple devices.&quot;

I think that should have said &quot;format shifting&quot;.
Phase shifting is a sound manipulation technique that has nothing to do with this discussion.
: )

Otherwise, nice overview, Surfer!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Then came phase-shifting. The ability to transpose one format to another for use on multiple devices.&#8221;</p>
<p>I think that should have said &#8220;format shifting&#8221;.<br />
Phase shifting is a sound manipulation technique that has nothing to do with this discussion.<br />
: )</p>
<p>Otherwise, nice overview, Surfer!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
