<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Sony Way</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/2296/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/2296</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:11:09 -0300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/2296/comment-page-1#comment-4990</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2004 06:29:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-4990</guid>
		<description>Sony is really only displaying good business sense to be straddling both sides of the fence. 

In the 18th and 19th centuries the Rothschild bankers made a fortune by loaning money to (if not inciting) nations at war - and preferrably both sides at the same time - patriotism be damned!

Sony has acknowledged the reality that people are going to be &quot;pirating&quot; anyway, with or without them, so it&#039;s always better to be the one selling equipment to pirates than to have someone else profit from it. Sony&#039;s only tactical error was in failing to aggressively develop &quot;piracy-inducing&quot; products - and allowing Apple to beat them to the punch with their highly profitable IPOD.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sony is really only displaying good business sense to be straddling both sides of the fence. </p>
<p>In the 18th and 19th centuries the Rothschild bankers made a fortune by loaning money to (if not inciting) nations at war &#8211; and preferrably both sides at the same time &#8211; patriotism be damned!</p>
<p>Sony has acknowledged the reality that people are going to be &#8220;pirating&#8221; anyway, with or without them, so it&#8217;s always better to be the one selling equipment to pirates than to have someone else profit from it. Sony&#8217;s only tactical error was in failing to aggressively develop &#8220;piracy-inducing&#8221; products &#8211; and allowing Apple to beat them to the punch with their highly profitable IPOD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/2296/comment-page-1#comment-4989</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2004 06:05:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-4989</guid>
		<description>BMG essentially sued itself when it was heavily invested in Napster at the same time that BMG was a RIAA member during their lawsuit against Naster.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BMG essentially sued itself when it was heavily invested in Napster at the same time that BMG was a RIAA member during their lawsuit against Naster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/2296/comment-page-1#comment-4967</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2004 18:09:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-4967</guid>
		<description>Question? If the Induce act passes, won&#039;t that mean the RIAA and MPAA will have to sue itsself for offering files for download on P2P networks. Also RCA, Sony, and all other TV makers will have to be sued for making a device that makes me want to copy the tv shows &quot;hellywood&quot; produces. I beleve that should be the &quot;INDUNCE ACT&quot; It&#039;s takes a real &quot;dunce&quot; to come up with something like that. Mabey we should look at filling a class action suit against all company&#039;s that produce multimedia in any form.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Question? If the Induce act passes, won&#8217;t that mean the RIAA and MPAA will have to sue itsself for offering files for download on P2P networks. Also RCA, Sony, and all other TV makers will have to be sued for making a device that makes me want to copy the tv shows &#8220;hellywood&#8221; produces. I beleve that should be the &#8220;INDUNCE ACT&#8221; It&#8217;s takes a real &#8220;dunce&#8221; to come up with something like that. Mabey we should look at filling a class action suit against all company&#8217;s that produce multimedia in any form.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/2296/comment-page-1#comment-4943</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2004 03:05:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-4943</guid>
		<description>If the Induce act passes Sony will have to sue itself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the Induce act passes Sony will have to sue itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


