Comments on: MediaSentry OK in RIAA v Thomas

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Fri, 12 Jun 2009 21:26:05 +0000

Good! Hopefully this is a judge with a brain who has not be corrupted by the RIAA.

I hope!

By the way El Quada is running out of money. Hopefully the copyright terrorists should be running out of money soon as well.

Just a though.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Fri, 12 Jun 2009 15:22:47 +0000

@ Dreddsnik

This is not as dire as it would seem.

And that is exacxtly the point of this story

By: Dreddsnik

Dreddsnik — Fri, 12 Jun 2009 14:57:33 +0000

This is not as dire as it would seem.

Quoting RB from his site .

” It could mean victory for Jammie.

The judge described the Daubert standards quite carefully.

Neither MediaSentry nor Jacobson will be able to satisfy those standards, which means that their testimony, and MediaSentry’s documents, will not be admissible.

Which means the RIAA’s case will be dismissed at the close of the plaintiffs’ case. ”

By allowing this testimony, this forces these two buttheads to endure Daubert scrutiny, which
they will ( or should ) fail miserably. If they fail daubert here they will be useless in EVERY OTHER CASE
THEY ARE INVOLVED IN.

Not allowing their testimony would stall such a crucial examination, allowing them to bullshit other judges.